Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organisationale Identifikation und Kommunikation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Mitarbeiterkommunikation

  • 1066 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Schlüssel zu erfolgreicher Kommunikation zwischen Führungsperson und Mitarbeitenden liegt darin, einen gemeinsamen Rahmen zu haben. Zunächst wird dargestellt, welchen Beitrag der Social Identity Approach zur Schaffung gemeinsamer Normen und Werte zwischen Führungsperson und Mitarbeitenden leistet, um dann empirische Arbeiten zur Relevanz der sozialen Identität für organisationale Kommunikation darzustellen. Anschließend werden Empfehlungen zur Erleichterung erfolgreicher Kommunikation durch Nutzung der sozialen Identität gegeben und auf die Relevanz der Kommunikation auf Augenhöhe und die Berücksichtigung des kollektiven Selbstkonzeptes in heutigen Führungsfragen eingegangen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Avolio, B. J. (2018). Organizational transformation: How to achieve it, one person at a time. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the „E“ to E-Leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Patterson, C., & Baker, B. (2015). Alaska Airlines: Navigating change. London: Ivey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, N. B., & Hogg, M. A. (2017). Evaluation of and support for group prototypical leaders: A meta-analysis of twenty years of empirical research. Social Influence, 12(1), 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracht, E. M., Junker, N. M., & van Dick, R. (2018). Exploring the social context of self-leadership – Self-leadership-culture. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2(4), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, S., Hernandez Bark, A., Kirchner, A., Stegmann, S., & Van Dick, R. (2019). Emails from the boss – curse or blessing? Relations between communication channels, leader evaluation and employees’ attitudes. International Journal of Business Communication, 56(1), 50–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415597516.

  • Brewer, M. B. (2003). Optimal distinctiveness, social identity and the self. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Hrsg.), Handbook of self and identity (S. 480–491). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this „We“? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83.

  • Chen, Z., Zhu, J., & Zhou, M. (2015). How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, M. (2010). Succeeding with Agile. Software development using scrum. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, R. van, Hirst, G., Grojean, M. W., & Wieseke, J. (2007). Relationships between leader and follower organizational identification and implications for follower attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X71831.

  • Dick, R. van, Lemoine, J. E., Steffens, N. K., Kerschreiter, R., Akfirat, S. A., Avanzi, L., Dumont, K., Epitropaki, O., Fransen, K., Giessner, S., Gonzáles, R., Kark, R., Lipponen, J., Markovits, Y., Monzani, L., Orosz, G., Pandey, D., Roland-Lévy, C., Schuh, S. C., Sekiguchi, T., Song, L. J., Stouten, J., Tatachari, S., Valdenegro, D., van Bunderen, L., Vörös, V., Wong, S. I., Zhang, X-a., & Haslam, S. A. (2018). Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(4), 697–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12223.

  • Dick, R. van, & Schuh, S. C. (2010). My boss’ group is my group: Experimental evidence for the leader-follower identity transfer. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31(6), 551–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437731011070032.

  • Dick, R. van, & Schuh, S. C. (2016). Führung von Gruppenprozessen: Identität und Identifikation bei den Mitarbeitern stiften. In J. Felfe & R. van Dick (Hrsg.), Handbuch Mitarbeiterführung: Wirtschaftspsychologisches Praxiswissen für Fach- und Führungskräfte (S. 41–52). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, K. H., Wright, R. G., Willingham, J., Reynolds, K. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2015). Shared identity is key to effective communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214559709.

  • Haslam, S., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2. Aufl.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knippenberg, D. van, & Hogg, M. A. (2003). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Kramer (Hrsg.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 25, S. 243–295). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25006-1.

  • Lee, K.-J. (2017). Knowledge sharing in franchise system: Franchisee self-leadership, satisfaction, and compliance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(12), 3101–3118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S., Park, T. Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000012.

  • Lucke, G. A., & Furtner, M. R. (2015). Soldiers lead themselves to more success: A self-leadership intervention study. Military Psychology, 27(5), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1991). SuperLeadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y., Song, J. H., & Lim, D. H. (2016). Organizational justice and work engagement: The mediating effect of self-leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 37(6), 711–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, A., & Wagner, D. (2014). Leadership 2.0: Engaging and supporting leaders in the transition towards a networked organization. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (S. 574–583). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005.

  • Schuh, S. C., Egold, N. W., & Van Dick, R. (2012). Towards understanding the role of organizational identification in service settings: A multilevel, multisource study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(4), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.578391.

  • Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., Boen, F., et al. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1001–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002.

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Hrsg.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (S. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, J., Christ, O., & van Dick, R. (2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: Prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012936.

  • Wieseke, J., Ahearne, M., Lam, S. K., & Dick, R. van. (2009). The role of leaders in internal marketing. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.2.123.

  • Wilder, D. A. (1990). Some determinants of the persuasive power of ingroups and outgroups: Organization of information and attribution of independence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1202–1213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Psychologie, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Rolf van Dick, Eva Bracht & Alina S. Hernandez Bark

Authors
  1. Rolf van Dick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eva Bracht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alina S. Hernandez Bark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rolf van Dick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Publizistik- und Kommunikationswissenschaft, Universität Wien, Wien, Austria

    Sabine Einwiller

  2. Professur für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany

    Sonja A. Sackmann

  3. Institut für Kommunikations- und Medienwissenschaft, Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    Ansgar Zerfaß

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

van Dick, R., Bracht, E., Hernandez Bark, A.S. (2019). Organisationale Identifikation und Kommunikation. In: Einwiller, S., Sackmann, S., Zerfaß, A. (eds) Handbuch Mitarbeiterkommunikation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23390-7_6-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23390-7_6-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-23390-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-23390-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation