Skip to main content

A Class of Stationary EOQ Problems and Learning Effects

  • Conference paper
Optimization and Operations Research

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 157))

  • 990 Accesses

Abstract

The classical formula (5) for optimal lot sizing is a useful tool especially for those manufacturing processes in which labor-intensive items are produced in small quantities, and which require a frequent change of product. An example is the manufacture of special purpose instruments. The simplicity of the formula is essentially a result of assuming production cost to be a linear function of the quantity produced, and of assuming stationarity of demand. More complex models which consider nonlinear costs [5], [19], or which incorporate dynamic demand [16], or which include capacity constraints [4] require nonlinear and dynamic programming techniques as well as the measurement and estimation of additional parameters; they can therefore be put to use only in cases of mass production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BALOFF, N., “Estimating the Parameters of the Startup Model — An Empirical Approach”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 18 (1967) 4, pp. 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CONWAY, R.W. AND SCHULTZ, A., “The Manufacturing Progress Function”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 10 (1959) 1, pp. 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. EBERT, R.J., “Aggregate Planning with Learning Curve Productivity”, Management Science, Vol. 23 (October 1976), No.2, pp. 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. FLORIAN, M. AND KLEIN, M., “Deterministic Production Planning with Concave Costs and Capacity Constraints”, Management Science, Vol. 18 (September 1971), No. 1, pp. 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. HADLEY, G. AND WHITIN, T.M., “Analysis of Inventory Systems”, Prentice-Hall, London, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  6. HIRSCH, W.Z., “Manufacturing Progress Functions”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 34 (1952), pp. 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. HIRSCH, W.Z., “Firm Progress Ratios”, Econometrica, Vol. 24 (1956) 2, pp. 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. HIRSCHMAN, W.B., “Profit From the Learning Curve”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 42 (1964), pp. 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  9. JOHNSON.. L.A. AND MONTGOMERY, D.C., “Operations Research in Production Planning, Scheduling, and Inventory Control”, J.Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LEVY, F.K., “Adaption in the Production Progress”, Management Science, Vol. 11 (1965) 6, pp. B136–B154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. LOVE, S.F., “Bounded Production and Inventory Models with Piecewise Concave Costs”, Management Science, Vol. 20 (1973) 3, pp. 313–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MANNE, A.S., “Programming of Economic Lot Sizes”, Management Science, Vol. 4 (Jan., 1958), No.2, pp. 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. THE BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP, “Perspectives On Experience”, The Boston Consulting Group, Boston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  14. VEINOTT, A.F., “The Status of Mathematical Inventory Theory”, Management Science, Vol. 12 (1966) 11, pp. 745–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. WAGNER, H.M., “Principles of Operations Research — With Applications to Managerial Decisions”, Prentice-Hall, 2nd ed., London 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WAGNER, H.M. AND WHITIN, T.M., “Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model”, Management Science, Vol. 5 (1959) 1, pp. 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. WRIGHT, T.P., “Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes”, Journal of Aeronautical Science, Vol. 3 (1936), pp. 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  18. ZANGWILL, W.I., “Production Smoothing of Economic Lot Sizes with Nondecreasing Requirements”, Management Science, Vol. 13 (1966) 3, pp. 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ZANGWILL, W.I., “The Piecewise Concave Function”, Management Science, Vol. 13 (1967) 11, pp. 900–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muth, E.J., Spremann, K. (1978). A Class of Stationary EOQ Problems and Learning Effects. In: Henn, R., Korte, B., Oettli, W. (eds) Optimization and Operations Research. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 157. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95322-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95322-4_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-08842-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95322-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics