Abstract
The classical formula (5) for optimal lot sizing is a useful tool especially for those manufacturing processes in which labor-intensive items are produced in small quantities, and which require a frequent change of product. An example is the manufacture of special purpose instruments. The simplicity of the formula is essentially a result of assuming production cost to be a linear function of the quantity produced, and of assuming stationarity of demand. More complex models which consider nonlinear costs [5], [19], or which incorporate dynamic demand [16], or which include capacity constraints [4] require nonlinear and dynamic programming techniques as well as the measurement and estimation of additional parameters; they can therefore be put to use only in cases of mass production.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BALOFF, N., “Estimating the Parameters of the Startup Model — An Empirical Approach”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 18 (1967) 4, pp. 248–253.
CONWAY, R.W. AND SCHULTZ, A., “The Manufacturing Progress Function”, Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 10 (1959) 1, pp. 39–54.
EBERT, R.J., “Aggregate Planning with Learning Curve Productivity”, Management Science, Vol. 23 (October 1976), No.2, pp. 171–182.
FLORIAN, M. AND KLEIN, M., “Deterministic Production Planning with Concave Costs and Capacity Constraints”, Management Science, Vol. 18 (September 1971), No. 1, pp. 12–20.
HADLEY, G. AND WHITIN, T.M., “Analysis of Inventory Systems”, Prentice-Hall, London, 1963.
HIRSCH, W.Z., “Manufacturing Progress Functions”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 34 (1952), pp. 143–155.
HIRSCH, W.Z., “Firm Progress Ratios”, Econometrica, Vol. 24 (1956) 2, pp. 136–143.
HIRSCHMAN, W.B., “Profit From the Learning Curve”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 42 (1964), pp. 125–139.
JOHNSON.. L.A. AND MONTGOMERY, D.C., “Operations Research in Production Planning, Scheduling, and Inventory Control”, J.Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1974.
LEVY, F.K., “Adaption in the Production Progress”, Management Science, Vol. 11 (1965) 6, pp. B136–B154.
LOVE, S.F., “Bounded Production and Inventory Models with Piecewise Concave Costs”, Management Science, Vol. 20 (1973) 3, pp. 313–318.
MANNE, A.S., “Programming of Economic Lot Sizes”, Management Science, Vol. 4 (Jan., 1958), No.2, pp. 115–135.
THE BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP, “Perspectives On Experience”, The Boston Consulting Group, Boston, 1972.
VEINOTT, A.F., “The Status of Mathematical Inventory Theory”, Management Science, Vol. 12 (1966) 11, pp. 745–777.
WAGNER, H.M., “Principles of Operations Research — With Applications to Managerial Decisions”, Prentice-Hall, 2nd ed., London 1975.
WAGNER, H.M. AND WHITIN, T.M., “Dynamic Version of the Economic Lot Size Model”, Management Science, Vol. 5 (1959) 1, pp. 89–96.
WRIGHT, T.P., “Factors Affecting the Cost of Airplanes”, Journal of Aeronautical Science, Vol. 3 (1936), pp. 122–128.
ZANGWILL, W.I., “Production Smoothing of Economic Lot Sizes with Nondecreasing Requirements”, Management Science, Vol. 13 (1966) 3, pp. 191–209.
ZANGWILL, W.I., “The Piecewise Concave Function”, Management Science, Vol. 13 (1967) 11, pp. 900–912.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Muth, E.J., Spremann, K. (1978). A Class of Stationary EOQ Problems and Learning Effects. In: Henn, R., Korte, B., Oettli, W. (eds) Optimization and Operations Research. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 157. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95322-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-95322-4_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-08842-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-95322-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive