Skip to main content

Klinische Relevanz der Pharmakokinetik für die Pharmakodynamik von ß-Blockern

  • Chapter
Book cover Betablocker — im Mittelpunkt der Forschung
  • 27 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

β-Blocker wurden bereits in den 60er Jahren in die klinische Praxis eingeführt. Seitdem ist überzeugend demonstriert worden, daß einige β-Blocker die kardiovaskuläre Morbidität und Mortalität in Langzeitstudien bei Hypertonic [22] und zur Post-Myokardinfarkt-Prophylaxe [5] reduzieren. Es sind mehrere vermutliche Eigenschaften dieser Wirkstoffe mitgeteilt worden, die auf eine mögliche kardioprotektive Aktivität hinweisen:

  • Mechanismen

    • Verbesserung des Ungleichgewichts zwischen Koronardurchfluß und myokardialem Bedarf,

    • antiarrhythmische Wirkungen,

    • Schutz ischämischer Gewebe,

    • Reduzierung der Atheromentwicklung;

  • Wirkungen auf Daten beim Tier

    • koronare Durchflußmuster,

    • Infarktgröße,

    • Stoffwechselfunktionen,

    • Arrhythmien;

  • Klinisch

    • primäre Prävention,

    • akute Post-MI-Verabreichung,

    • chronische Post-MI-Verabreichung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abrahamsson B, Lucker P, Olofsson B, Regårdh C-G, Sandberg A, Wieselgren I, Bergstrand R (1990) The relationship between metoprolol plasma concentration and β1-blockade in healthy subjects: A study on conventional metoprolol and metoprolol CR/Zok formulations. J Clin Pharmacol 30: S46–S54.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akhlaghi S, Maxwill SRJ, Kendall MJ, Hughes B, Greenhaff P (1993) A comparison of the β1-selectivity of conventional metoprolol and metoprolol CR during exercise in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharm Ther 18: 259–266.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benfield P, Clisold SP, Brogden RN (1986) Metoprolol: An update review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension, ischemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders. Drugs 31: 376–429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Briant RH, Dorrington RE, Ferry DG, Paxton UW (1983) Bioavailability of metoprolol in young adults and the elderly, with additional studies on the effects of metoclopramide and probanthine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 25: 353–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hjalmarson Å, Olsson G (1991) Myocardial infarction: Effects of β-blockade. Circulation 84 (suppl VI): VI101-VI107.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnsson G, Regårdh C-G, Sölvell L (1975) Combined pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in man of the adrenergic β1-receptor antagonist metoprolol. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 36 (suppl 5): 31–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jordö L, Attman PO, Aurell M, Johansson L, Johnsson G, Regårdh C-G (1980) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of metoprolol in patients with impaired renal function. Clin Pharmacokinet 5: 169–180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kendall MJ (1981) Are selective β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs an advantage? J R Coll Physicians Lond 15: 33–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kendall MJ, Akhlaghi S, Hughes B, Lewis H 1990) Is metoprolol CR/Zok more selective than conventional metoprolol and atenolol? J Clin Pharmacol 30: S98–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Larsson M, Landahl S, Lundborg P, Regårdh C-G (1984) Pharmacokinetics of metoprolol in healthy, elderly, non-smoking individuals after a single dose and two weeks of treatment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 27: 217–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Löfdahl CG, Svedmyr N (1981) Cardioselectivity of atenolol and metoprolol. A study in asthmatic patients. Eur J Respir Dis 62: 396–404

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Löfdahl CG, Dahlöf C, Westergren G, Olofsson B, Svedmyr N (1988) Controlled-release metoprolol compared with atenolol in asthmatic patients: interaction with terbutaline. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33 (suppl): S25–S32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lucker P, Moore G, Wieselgren I, Olofsson B, Bergstrand R (1990) Pharmacokinetic and phar-macodynamic comparison of metoprolol CR/Zok once daily with conventional tablets once daily and in divided doses. J Clin Pharmacol 30: S17–S27.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Minneman KL, Hedberg A, Molinoff PB (1979) Comparison of β-adrenoceptor subtypes in mammalian tissue. J Pharm Exp Ther 211: 502–508.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Norwegian Multicenter Study Group (1981) Timolol-induced eduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 304: 801–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Omvik P, Leer J, Istad H, Westergren G (1994) Equal efficacy and improved tolerability with 50 mg controlled-release metoprolol compared with 100 mg conventional metoprolol in hyper-tensive patients. Am J Ther 1: 65–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regårdh C-G (1982) Pharmacokinetic aspects of some β-blocking drugs. Acta Med Scand 665 (suppl): 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Regårdh C-G, Borg KO, Johansson R, Johnsson G, Palmer L (1974) Pharmacokinetic studies on the selective β1-receptor antagonist metoprolol in man. J. Pharmacokinet Biopharm 2: 347–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandberg A, Abrahamsson B, Regårdh C-G, Wieselgren I, Bergstrand R (1990) Pharmaco-kinetic and biopharmaceutic aspects of once daily treatment with metoprolol CR/Zok: A review article. J Clin Pharmacol 30: S2–S16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith SR, Kendall MJ, Worthington DJ, Holder R (1983) Can the biochemical responses to a β2-adrenoceptor stimulant be used to assess the selectivity of β-adrenoceptors? Br J Clin Pharmacol 16: 557–560.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Westergren G, Olofsson B, Palevlief K (1994) Effective once-daily treatment of hypertension with low-dose controlled release metoprolol. Curr Ther Res 55: 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wikstrand J, Warnold I, Olsson G, Tuomilehto J, Elmfeldt D, Berglund G (1988) Primary pre-vention with metoprolol in patients with hypertension: Mortality results from the MAPHY study. JAMA 259: 1976–1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olsson, G. (1997). Klinische Relevanz der Pharmakokinetik für die Pharmakodynamik von ß-Blockern. In: Dominiak, P., Hjalmarson, A., Kendall, M.J., Kübler, W., Olsson, G. (eds) Betablocker — im Mittelpunkt der Forschung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60716-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60716-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64522-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60716-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics