Abstract
In Chapter 5, we established the equivalence of two seemingly quite different concepts: on the one hand the knowledge spaces, and on the other hand the entailments for Q. Recall that the latter are the relations {IE275-1} that satisfy the following two conditions: for all q ∈ Q and A, B ∈ 2Q\{∅},
-
(1) if q ∈ A, then {IE274-2};
-
(2) if {IE274-3} and {IE274-4} holds whenever b ∈ B, then {IE274-5} (see Theorem 5.5). The unique entailment {IE274-6} derived from some particular space {IE274-7}, is defined by the formula {IE274-7} where A ∈ 2Q \ {∅} and q ∈ Q. An empirical interpretation of an entailment is suggested by this formula, in terms of the responses to a class of questions or queries that an expert may be asked. In the field of education, these queries may take the form:
[Q1] Suppose that a student under examination has just provided wrong responses to all the questions in some set A. Is it practically certain that this student will also fail item q? Assume that the conditions are ideal in the sense that errors and lucky guesses are excluded.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Doignon, JP., Falmagne, JC. (1999). Building the Knowledge Structure in Practice. In: Knowledge Spaces. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58625-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58625-5_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64501-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58625-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive