Abstract
Green and sustainable supply chain activities are implemented as organizations and their partners respond to environmental pressures. Many of these activities require supporting technologies to help meet their goals. These technologies may include product, process, or organizational technologies that can help in planning and managing the activities. The evaluation of these technologies is not always a trivial approach that is based only on cost. Multiple factors and attributes come are considered in such situations. Thus, tools and models to help in green supply chain management technology evaluation and justification decisions can prove valuable. Using regular, grey, and fuzzy numbers within a TOPSIS methodology we seek to address this issue. Data is evaluated with an illustrative illustration to exemplify the utility of this approach. Insights for the reader are also presented in this Chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bai, C., Sarkis, J.: Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124(1), 252–264 (2010)
Bai, C., Sarkis, J.: Evaluating supplier development programs with a grey based rough set methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(11), 13505–13517 (2011)
Bai, C., Sarkis, J.: Performance measurement and evaluation for sustainable supply chains using rough set and data envelopment analysis. In: Boone, T., Jayaraman, V., Ganeshan, R. (eds.) Sustainable Supply Chains, pp. 223–241. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Bai, C., Sarkis, J., Wei, X., Kho, L.: Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 17(1), 78–92 (2012)
Bae, S.H., Sarkis, J., Yoo, C.S.: Greening transportation fleets: insights from a two-stage game theoretic model. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 47(6), 793–807 (2011)
Chen, C.T.: Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(1), 1–9 (2000)
Chen, M.F., Tzeng, G.H.: Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Math. Comput. Model. 40, 1473–149 (2004)
Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L. (eds.): Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1992)
Darnall, N., Jolley, G.J., Handfield, R.: Environmental management systems and green supply chain management: complements for sustainability? Bus. Strategy Environ. 17(1), 30–45 (2008)
Deng, J.L.: Control problems of grey system. Syst. Control Lett. 11(5), 288–294 (1982)
Deng, J.L.: Grey Systems. Sci-Tech Information Services, Windsor (1988)
Deng, J.L.: Introduction to grey system theory. J. Grey Syst. 1(1), 1–24 (1989)
Dubois, D., Prade, H. (eds.): Fuzzy Sets and Systems Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New York (1980)
Huang, G.H., Baetz, B.W., Patry, G.G.: Grey integer programming: an application to waste management planning under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 83(3), 594–620 (1995)
Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Application. Springer, Berlin (1981)
Kalbar, P.P., Karmakar, S., Asolekar, S.R.: Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. J. Environ. Manag. 113, 158–169 (2012)
Khalili, N.R., Duecker, S.: Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management systems. J. Clean. Prod. 47, 188–198 (2013)
Klassen, R.D., Vachon, S.: Collaboration and evaluation in the supply chain: the impact on plant-level environmental investment. Prod. Oper. Manag. 12(3), 336–352 (2009)
Krohling, R.A., Campanharo, V.C.: Fuzzy TOPSIS for group decision making: a case study for accidents with oil spill in the sea. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(4), 4190–4197 (2011)
Lefley, F., Sarkis, J.: Short-termism and the appraisal of AMT capital projects in the US and UK. Int. J. Prod. Res. 35(2), 341–368 (1997)
Li, D.-F.: A fast approach to compute fuzzy values of matrix games with payoffs of triangular fuzzy numbers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223, 421–429 (2012)
Li, P., Tan, T.C., Lee, J.Y.: Grey relational analysis of amine inhibition of mild steel corrosion in acids. Corrosion 53(3), 186–194 (1997)
Opricovica, S., Tzeng, G.-H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 445–455 (2004)
Presley, A., Meade, L., Sarkis, J.: A strategic sustainability justification methodology for organizational decisions: a reverse logistics illustration. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45, 4595–4620 (2007)
Presley, A., Sarkis, J.: An activity based strategic justification methodology for ECM technology. Int. J. Environ. Conscious Des. Manuf. 3(1), 5–17 (1994)
Sarkis, J.: Supply chain management and environmentally conscious design and manufacturing. Int. J. Environ. Conscious Des. Manuf. 4(2), 43–52 (1995)
Sarkis, J.: Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 107(1), 159–174 (1998)
Sarkis, J.: A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious manufacturing programs. Comput. Ind. Eng. 36(4), 793–810 (1999)
Sarkis, J.: A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J Clean. Prod. 11, 397 (2003)
Sarkis, J.: Convincing industry that there is value in environmentally supply chains. Probl. Sustain. Dev. 4(1), 61–64 (2009)
Sarkis, J.: A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 17(2), 202–216 (2012)
Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J.J.: Ecological modernization in the electrical utility industry: an application of a bads-goods DEA model of ecological and technical efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 219(2), 386–395 (2012)
Sarkis, J., Meade, L.M., Presley, A.R.: Incorporating sustainability into contractor evaluation and team formation in the built environment. J. Clean. Prod. 31, 40–53 (2012)
Sarkis, J., Sundarraj, R.P.: Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 30(3/4), 196–220 (2000)
Sarkis, J., Tamarkin, M.: Real options analysis for “green trading”: the case of greenhouse gases. Eng. Econ. 50(3), 273–294 (2005)
Sarkis, J., Weinrach, J.: Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate environmentally conscious waste treatment technology. J. Clean. Prod. 9(5), 417–427 (2001)
Seuring, S.: A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst. 54(4), 1513–1520 (2013)
Vachon, S.: Green supply chain practices and the selection of environmental technologies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(18–19), 4357–4379 (2007)
Vachon, S., Klassen, R.D.: Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(2), 401–423 (2007)
Yu, V.F., Hu, K.J.: An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria approach for the performance evaluation of multiple manufacturing plants. Comput. Ind. Eng. 58(2), 269–277 (2010)
Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.-H.: Evaluating green supply chain management among Chinese manufacturers from the ecological modernization perspective. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 47(6), 808–821 (2011)
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J.: Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese manufacturing enterprises. J. Oper. Manag. 22, 265–289 (2004)
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project (71102090); Liaoning Education Department Foundation of China (W2011125).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bai, C., Sarkis, J. (2014). Green Supply Chain Technology: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Justification Multiattribute Decision Modeling Approach. In: Kahraman, C., Öztayşi, B. (eds) Supply Chain Management Under Fuzziness. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 313. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53939-8_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53939-8_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-53938-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-53939-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)