Skip to main content

Perkutane Implantation peritonealer Portkatheter

  • Chapter
Portkathetersysteme
  • 22 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wegen des Risikos einer Peritonitis wurde die Indikation für eine intraperitonealen Therapie in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten zurückhaltend gestellt. Der Peritonealraum war selten ein Ziel therapeutischer Eingriffe. Eine Peritonealdialyse wurde selten und praktisch nur bei Lebensgefahr durchgeführt. Die wiederholte Punktion des Peritonealraums zur Dialyse und zur Aszitesentlastung war für die Patienten immer ein unangenehmes, belastendes Vorgehen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Alberts DS, Survit EA, Peng Y, McCloskey T, Rivest R, Graham V, McDonald L, Roe D (1988) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of mitoxantrone given to patients by intraperitoneal administration. Cancer Res 48:5874–5877

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Archer SG, McCulloch RK, Gray BN (1989) A cooperative study of pharmacokinetics of continous portal vein infusion versus intraperitoneal infusion of 5-fluorouracil. Reg Cancer Treat 2:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  3. Battelli T, Manocchi P (1977) Esperienze di chemotherapia nella carcinosi peritoneale. Minn Med 68:3583–3587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berek JS, Hacker NF, Lichtenstein A et al. (1985) Intraperitoneal recombinant alpha-2-interferon for „salvage“ immunotherapy in persistent epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 12 [Suppl B]:23–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dedrick RL, Myers CE, Bungay PM, De Vita jr VT (1978) Pharmacokinetic rationale for peritoneal drug administration in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat Rep 62:1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eggermont AMM (1989) Intracavitary immunotherapy: past, present and future treatment strategies. Reg Cancer Treat 2:37–48

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muller JH (1963) Curative aim and result of routine intraperitoneal radiocolloid administration in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Am J Roentgenol 89:533–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Potter ME, Partridge EE, Shingleton HM, Soong SJ, Kim RY, Hatch KD, Maxwell Austin J jr (1989) Intraperitoneal chromic phosphate in ovarion cancer: risks and benefits. Gynecol Oncol 32:314–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stewart JSW (1988) Intraperitoneal I131 and Y90 labelled monoclonal antibodies for ovarian cancer pharmacokinetics and normal tissue dosimetry. Int J Cancer [Suppl 3]

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashita S, Ito T, Kinashi N, Yakabe A (1987) Clinical study of intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic perfusion (IPCP) of mitomycin C (MMC) and intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 14:2458–2463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stumpf, J. (1993). Perkutane Implantation peritonealer Portkatheter. In: Haindl, H., Müller, H., Schmoll, E. (eds) Portkathetersysteme. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50265-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-50265-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-50266-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-50265-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics