Abstract
M-learning is often approached as an innovative method to teach, but quite often without the proper planning of the actual learning process and proper understanding of the implications on the pedagogy of the learning process in such a setting. Because of the multiple stakeholders in the process – the institution, the learners, the educators, the policy makers, etc. – it is very difficult to encourage educators to engage with something so different that will require a re-think of their teaching practices. In addition, with so many different technical elements and challenges, it is often simply just too daunting a prospect.
It is also unfortunate that m-learning is often only limited to simply mobile access. A good m-pedagogy will not just transfer the learning process to a mobile device, but incorporate the very nature of mobile, flexible, user-guided, bite-sized learning.
A real m-learning needs to have a real purpose and the stakeholders need to see the value in it for it to have a chance to be a success. With all the correct m-pedagogy in place, if the educators and the learners see the value of engaging, m-learning can bring real benefits – flexibility of access and flexibility of engagement – and thus allow a real tailoring of the learning process. It has only been very recently that a real attempt has been made to move to adaptive learning, incorporating pedagogy and AI (artificial intelligence) methods, and this approach seems to be pointing to a future of real adaptive m-learning.
References
Aubusson, P., S. Schuck, and K. Burden. 2009. Mobile learning for teacher professional learning: Benefits, obstacles and issues. Alt-J 17(3): 233–247.
Beetham, H. 2014. Students’ experiences and expectations of the digital environment | Jisc. 23 June 2014. Available at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/blog/students-experiences-and-expectations-of-the-digital-environment-23-jun-2014. Accessed 19 Aug 2014.
Bennett, S., and K. Maton. 2010. Beyond the “digital natives” debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26(5): 321–331.
Callum, K. Mac, and L. Jeffrey. 2013. The influence of students’ ICT skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29(3): 303–314.
Clark, D. 2014. Keynote speach, iTech 2014. Available at http://youtu.be/bO0W-2Kl_zQ
David, M., et al. 2012. Widening participation in higher education. Teaching and learning research programme. Available from http://www.tlrp.org/pub/documents/HEcomm.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.
Elias, T. 2011. Principles for mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(2): 143–156.
icrossing. 2014. Operating system. Available at http://connect.icrossing.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/iCrossing_Mobile-marketing_Jan_2014_FINAL.pdf
JISC. 2015. Digital student project | Jisc. Available at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/rd/projects/digital-student. Accessed 15 Apr 2015.
Keyes, J. 2013. Bring your own devices (BYOD) survival guide. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
Littlejohn, A. 2007. Preparing for blended e-learning. London: Routledge.
Mac Callum, K., and L. Jeffrey. 2014. Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior 39: 8–19.
Margaryan, A., A. Littlejohn, and G. Vojt. 2011. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education 56(2): 429–440.
Maslow, A. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50: 370–396.
Petrakieva, L. 2012. The shift to mobile devices. In User studies for digital library development, ed. M. Dobreva, A. O’Dwyer, and P. Feliciati, 159–165. London: Facet Publishing.
Prensky, M. 2001. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon 9(5):1–6. Available at http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky-Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants-Part1.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2014.
Van Deursen, A.J., and J.A. van Dijk. 2013. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society 16(3): 507–526.
West, M. and C. Ei. 2014. Reading in the mobile era: A study of mobile reading in developing countries. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002274/227436E.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Petrakieva, L. (2015). Mobile Technologies and Learning: Expectations, Myths, and Reality. In: Zhang, Y. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Mobile Technologies and Learning: Expectations, Myths, and Reality- Published:
- 17 October 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-2
-
Original
Mobile Technologies and Learning: Expectations, Myths, and Reality- Published:
- 11 April 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_28-1