Abstract
According to the principle of minimal change, an agent should not change her belief state more than is strictly required to accomodate new information. We propose a novel approach to the issue by considering a notion of optimality of belief revision policies that is sensitive to the target of revision.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourron, C.E., Gardenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985)
Baltag, A., Smets, S.: A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision. Texts in Logic and Games 3 (2008)
Baltag, A., Rodenhäuser, B., Smets, S.: Doxastic attitudes as belief revision policies. In: Proceedings of the ESSLLI Workshop on Strategies for Learning, Belief Revision and Preference Change (2012)
Baltag, A., Rodenhäuser, B., Smets, S.: Dynamic attitudes as strategies for belief change (unpublished manuscript 2013)
Board, O.: Dynamic interactive epistemology (2002)
Booth, R., Chopra, S., Meyer, T.: Admissible and restrained revision. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (2006)
Boutilier, C.: Revision sequences and nested conditionals. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1993), pp. 519–525 (1993)
Boutilier, C.: Iterated revision and minimal change of conditional beliefs. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25(3), 263–305 (1996)
Costa, H.A., Levi, I.: Contraction. on the decision-theoretic origins of minimal change and entrenchment (2005)
Darwiche, A., Pearl, J.: On the logic of iterated belief revision. Artificial Intelligence 89(1-29) (1996)
Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in Flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. The MIT Press (1988)
Harman, G.: Change in View. MIT Press (1986)
Nayak, A.C.: Iterated belief change based on epistemic entrenchment. Erkenntnis 41, 353–390 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rodenhäuser, B. (2013). Dynamic Attitudes, Fixed Points and Minimal Change. In: Grossi, D., Roy, O., Huang, H. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40947-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40948-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)