Skip to main content

Cliometrics and the Concept of Human Capital

Handbook of Cliometrics
  • 323 Accesses

Abstract

The role played by human capital in the historical process of economic development is an important issue in cliometrics. This chapter traces the history of the human capital concept and underlines that it has undergone criticism since its origins. Among these criticisms, we stress that the human capital research program was plagued with measurement difficulties. This issue has recently fostered a sense of strong reluctance toward the concept. Portraying a growing debate in cliometrics – the role of human capital in the first stage of the industrialization process in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in Western Europe – we emphasize that recent cliometric contributions on the issue open up stimulating lines of thought about what human capital is and how it can adequately be measured.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an exhaustive analysis of the authors who treated human beings as capital, see Kiker (1966).

  2. 2.

    Becker also mentions Mill and Marshall’s legacy.

  3. 3.

    Solow’s contribution of 1957 was a landmark in the development of growth accounting.

  4. 4.

    The residual was not the only puzzle that led Schultz to build the foundations of human capital theory. We must also cite the Leontief paradox (see Schultz 1972a). But the residual appears to be by far the most decisive element in the development of human capital theory.

  5. 5.

    Schultz pays explicit tribute to Becker’s theoretical model of investment in human capital, developed in the 1960s. See, for instance, Schultz, 1961b, p. 1037; at about the same time he also wrote: “I have placed the paper by Gary S. Becker first because it gives the reader an overview of the pervasiveness of human capital and because it reveals many vistas awaiting to be explored” (Schultz, 1962, p. 2).

  6. 6.

    For a critical review of the meanings associated with methodological individualism, as well as its contradictions, see Hodgson (2007).

  7. 7.

    “Becker and Mincer were not engaged in making aggregative estimates of the contribution of education to income growth” (Bowman, 1964, 453).

  8. 8.

    As underlined by Teixeira (2005, p. 137): “A peculiar aspect was that the initial development was isolated and only after Schultz saw Mincer’s dissertation and decided to invite him to Chicago for a post-doctoral fellowship (1957–1958), they interacted more closely. Then, they became aware of the closeness of their research and its unplanned complementarity”. See also Biddle and Holden (2016).

  9. 9.

    Schultz’s presidential address to the American Economic Association in 1960 is seen as one of the fundamental moments in the emerging theory of human capital (see, for instance, Teixeira 2000).

  10. 10.

    Microeconometric approaches have highlighted the existence of decreasing private returns of education (see notably Card (1999) and Psacharopoulos and Patrinos (2004)).

  11. 11.

    Eric Hanushek significantly contributed to the development of the so-called approaches of the “quality of education.” His early work on the subject began in 1970. Regarding the role of the quality of education in the contribution of human capital to growth, see, for instance, Hanushek and Kimko (2000), Jamison et al. (2007), or Hanushek and Woessmann (2008, 2011, 2012).

References

  • A’hearn B, Baten J, Crayen D (2009) Quantifying quantitative literacy: age heaping and the history of human capital. J Econ Hist 69(3):783–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramovitz M (1956) Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870. Resource and output trends in the United States Since 1870, NBER, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RC (2003) Progress and poverty in early modern Europe. Econ Hist Rev 56(3):403–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K (1973) Higher education as a filter. J Public Econ 2(3):193–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailly F (2016) The radical school and the economics of education. J Hist Econ Thought 38(03):351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baten J, Fourie J (2015) Numeracy of Africans, Asians, and Europeans during the early modern period: new evidence from Cape Colony court registers. Econ Hist Rev 68(2):632–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baten J, Crayen D, Voth H (2014) Numeracy and the impact of high food prices in industrializing britain, 1780–1850. Rev Econ Stat 96(3):418–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. J Polit Econ 70(5):9–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary (1964) Human Capital. A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker SO, Hornung E, Woessmann L (2011) Education and catch-up in the industrial revolution. Am Econ J Macroecon 3(3):92–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman J, Birdsall N (1983) The quality of schooling: quantity alone is misleading. Am Econ Rev 73:928–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib J, Spiegel MM (1994) The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. J Monet Econ 34(2):143–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddle J, Holden L (2016) The introduction of human capital theory into education policy in the United States. Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandy R (1967) Marshall on human capital: a note. J Polit Econ 75:874–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaug M (1966) Economics of education: a selected annoted bibliography. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug M (1976) The empirical status of human capital theory: a slightly jaundiced survey. J Econ Lit 14(3):827–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S, Gintis H (1975) The problem with human capital theory – a Marxian critique. Am Econ Rev 65(2):74–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JM (1964) Schultz, Denison, and the contribution of “Eds” to national income growth. J Polit Econ 72(5):450–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JM (1966) The human investment revolution in economic thought. Sociol Educ 39(2):111–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JM (1980) On Theodore W. Schultz’s contributions to economics. Scand J Econ 82(1):80–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadberry SN (2005) The productivity race: British manufacturing in international perspective, 1850–1990. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadberry SN (2006) Human capital and productivity performance: Britain, the United States and Germany, 1870–1990. In: David PA, Thomas M (eds) The economic future in historical perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli G (2016) Escaping from a human capital trap? Italy’s regions and the move to centralised primary schooling, 1861–1936. Eur Rev Econ Hist 20(1):46–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli G, Baten J (2017) European trade, colonialism and human capital accumulation in Senegal, Gambia and Western Mali, 1770–1900. J Econ Hist 77(3):920–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card D (1999) The causal effect of education on earnings. In: Handbook of labor economics, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1801–1863

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirat A, Le Chapelain C (2017) Some ‘unexpected proximities’ between Schultz and Galbraith on human capital. Working paper BETA, 2017–2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinnirella F, Streb J (2017) The role of human capital and innovation in economic development: evidence from post-Malthusian Prussia. J Econ Growth 22(2):193–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark G (2005) The condition of the working class in England, 1209–2004. J Polit Econ 113(6):1307–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen D, Soto M (2007) Growth and human capital: good data, good results. J Econ Growth 12(1):51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crayen D, Baten J (2010) New evidence and new methods to measure human capital inequality before and during the industrial revolution: France and the US in the seventeenth to nineteenth centuries. Econ Hist Rev 63(2):452–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Croix D, Doepke M, Mokyr J (2018) Clans, guilds, and markets: apprenticeship institutions and growth in the preindustrial economy. Q J Econ 133(1):1–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pleijt AM (2018) Human capital formation in the long run: evidence from average years of schooling in England, 1300–1900. Cliometrica 12(1):99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pleijt AM, Weisdorf J (2017) Human capital formation from occupations: the ‘deskilling hypothesis’ revisited. Cliometrica 11(1):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pleijt AM, Nuvolari A, Weisdorf J (2016) Human capital formation during the first industrial revolution: evidence from the use of steam engines (No. 294). Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)

    Google Scholar 

  • Demeulemeester J-L, Diebolt C (2011) Education and growth: what links for which policy? Hist Soc Res 36:323–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison EF (1962) Sources of economic growth in the United States and the alternatives before us. Committee for Economic Development, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebolt C, Haupert M (2017). A cliometric counterfactual: what if there had been neither Fogel nor North?. Cliometrica 12(3):407–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diebolt C, Le Chapelain C, Ménard A (2017) Industrialization as a deskilling process? Steam engines and human capital in XIXth century France. Working paper BETA, 2017-17, Working paper AFC 72017

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebolt C, Le Chapelain C, Ménard A (2018) Learning outside the factory: the impact of technological change on the rise of adult education in nineteenth-century France. Working paper AFC 2-2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich I, Murphy KM (2007) Why does human capital need a journal? J Hum Cap 1(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricant S (1954) Economic progress and economic change. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman NE, van der Beek K (2016) Skill choice and skill complementarity in eighteenth century England. Explor Econ Hist 59(January):94–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folloni G, Vittadini G (2010) Human capital measurement: a survey. J Econ Surv 24:248–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franck R, Galor O (2017) Technology-skill complementarity in the early phase of industrialization. IZA discussion paper series no 9758

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman R (1976) The overeducated American. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor O (2011) Unified growth theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O, Moav O (2002) Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Q J Econ 117(4):1133–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O, Weil DN (2000) Population, technology, and growth: from Malthusian stagnation to the demographic transition and beyond. Am Econ Rev 90(4):806–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C (1998) America’s graduation from high school: the evolution and spread of secondary schooling in the twentieth century. J Econ Hist 58(02):345–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C (2001) The human capital century and American leadership: virtues of the past. J Econ Hist 61:263–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C (2016) Human capital. In: Diebolt C, Haupert M (eds) Handbook of cliometrics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 55–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C, Katz LF (1998) The origins of technology-skill complementarity. Q J Econ 113(3):693–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C, Katz L (1999) The shaping of higher education: the formative years in the United States, 1890 to 1940. J Econ Perspect 13:37–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C, Katz L (2008) The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Kimko D (2000) Schooling, labor force quality, and the growth of nations. Am Econ Rev 90(5):1184–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Woessmann L (2008) The role of cognitive skills in economic development. J Econ Lit 46(3):607–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Woessmann L (2011) The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In: Hanushek E, Machin S, Woessmann L (eds) Handbook of the economics of education, vol 3. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 89–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Woessmann L (2012) Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. J Econ Growth 17(4):267–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek E, Woessmann L (2015) The knowledge capital of nations: education and the economics of growth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson GM (2007) Meanings of methodological individualism. J Econ Methodol 14(2):211–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries J (2003) English apprenticeship: a neglected factor in the first industrial revolution. In: David PA, Thomas M (eds) The economic future in historical perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob MC (1997) Scientific culture and the making of the industrial west. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob MC (2014) The first knowledge economy: human capital and the European economy, 1750–1850. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamison E, Jamison D, Hanushek E (2007) The effects of education quality on income growth and mortality decline. Econ Educ Rev 26:772–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly M, Mokyr J, Gráda CÓ (2014) Precocious Albion: a new interpretation of the British industrial revolution. Annu Rev Econ 6(1):363–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiker BF (1966) The historical roots of the concept of human capital. J Polit Econ 74(5):481–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiker BF (1968) Marshall on human capital: comment. J Polit Econ 76(5):1088–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau LJ, Jamison DT, Louat FF (1991) Education and productivity in developing countries: an aggregate production function approach, WPS 612. World Bank Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Chapelain C et Matéos S (2018) Schultz et le capital humain: une trajectoire intellectuelle, working paper AFC 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen JB, Murtin F (2017) British economic growth since 1270: the role of education. J Econ Growth 22(3):229–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107(2):407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. Macmillan, London, (eight edition, 1920)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey DN (2006) The bourgeois virtues: ethics for an age of commerce. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey DN (2010) Bourgeois dignity: why economics can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey DN (2016) Bourgeois equality: how ideas, not capital or institutions, enriched the world, vol 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisenzahl R, Mokyr J (2012) The rate and direction of invention during the industrial revolution: incentives and institutions. In: Lerner J, Stern S (eds) The rate and direction of inventive activity revisited. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 443–479

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1957) A study on personal income distribution. PhD Dissertation, Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1958) Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. J Polit Econ 66(4):281–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitch D (1999) The role of education and skill in the British industrial revolution. In: Mokyr J (ed) The British industrial revolution: an economic perspective, 2nd edn. Westview, Boulder, pp 241–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J (1990) The lever of riches: technological creativity and technological progress. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J (1993) The new economic history and the industrial revolution. In: Mokyr J (ed) The British Industrial Revolution: an economic perspective. Westview, Boulder, Editor’s Introduction

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J (2005) Long-term economic growth and the history of technology. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1113–1180

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr J (2016) A culture of growth: the origins of the modern economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nehru V, Swanson E, Dubey A (1995) A new database on human capital stock in developing and industrial countries: sources, methodology, and results. J Dev Econ 46(2):379–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove M (1999) Transforming economics: Theodore W. Schultz, 1902–1998: in memoriam. Econ J 109:F726–F748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas SJ, Nicholas JM (1992) Male literacy, “Deskilling,” and the industrial revolution. J Interdiscip Hist 23(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prados de la Escosura LP, Rosés JR (2010) Human capital and economic growth in Spain, 1850–2000. Explor Econ Hist 47(4):520–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett L (2001) Where has all the education gone ? World Bank Econ Rev 15:367–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psacharopoulos G, Patrinos HA (2004) Returns to investment in education: a further update. Educ Econ 12(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1986) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Polit Econ 94(5):1002–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98(5):S71–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S (2008) Human capital. In: Durlauf SN, Blume LE (eds) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, 2nd edn. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg LG (1979) The case of the impoverished sophisticate: human capital and Swedish economic growth before World War I. J Econ Hist 39(1):225–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson M (1972) Literacy and social mobility in the industrial revolution in England. Past Present 56:75–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1943) Redirecting farm policy. MacMillan, New York, États-Unis

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1958) The emerging economic scene and its relation to high-school education. In: Chase FS, Anderson HA (eds) The high school in a new era. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 97–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1959) Investment in man: an economist’s view. Soc Serv Rev 33(2):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1960) Capital formation by education. J Polit Econ 60:571–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1961a) Investment in human capital. Am Econ Rev 51(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1961b) Investment in human capital: reply. Am Econ Rev 51(5):1035–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1962) Reflections on investment in man. J Polit Econ 70(5):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1972a) Human capital: policy issues and research opportunities. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, pp 1–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1972b) Optimal investment in college instruction: equity and efficiency. J Polit Econ 80(3, Part.2):S2–S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz TW (1992) Adam smith and human capital. In: Fry M (ed) Adam Smith’s legacy. His place in the developement of modern economics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer HG (1961) Investment in Human Capital: comment. Am Econ Rev 51(5):1026–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vol [éd. par R.H. Campbel et A.S. Skinner]. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel I (1978) Human capital revolution in economics development: current status, expectations and realities. Comp Educ Rev, 25th Anniversary Issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel I (1982) Human capital and institutional theories of the labor market: rivals or complements? J Econ Issues 16(1):255–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70:65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat 39(3):312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spengler JJ (1977) Adam Smith on human capital. Am Econ Rev 67(1):32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Squicciarini M, Voigtländer N (2015) Human capital and industrialization: evidence from the age of enlightenment. Q J Econ 30(4):1825–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE (1975) The theory of “screening,” education, and the distribution of income. Am Econ Rev 65(3):283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetland SR (1996) Human capital theory: foundations of a field of inquiry. Rev Educ Res 66(3):341–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira PN (2000) A portrait of the economics of education, 1960–1997. Hist Polit Econ 32:257–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira PN (2005) The ‘Human capital revolution’ in economics. Hist Econ Ideas:129–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira PN (2007) Jacob Mincer. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira PN (2011) A reluctant founding father: placing Jacob Mincer in the history of (labor) economics. Eur J Hist Econ Thought 18(5):673–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira PN (2014) Gary Becker’s early work on human capital – collaborations and distinctiveness. IZA J Labor Econ 3(12):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1942) Zur theorie der langfristigen wirtschaftsentwicklung. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch:511–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollnek F, Baten J (2016) Age-heaping-based human capital estimates. In: Diebolt and Haupert (eds) Handbook of Cliometrics, Springer Verlag, pp 131–154

    Google Scholar 

  • White LH, (2017) Human capital and its critics: Gary Becker, institutionalism, and anti- neoliberalism. GMU working paper in economics no 17-02

    Google Scholar 

  • Woessmann L (2003) Specifying human capital. J Econ Surv 17(3):239–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeev NB, Mokyr J, Van Der Beek K (2017) Flexible supply of apprenticeship in the british industrial revolution. J Econ Hist 77(1):208–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Le Chapelain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Le Chapelain, C. (2019). Cliometrics and the Concept of Human Capital. In: Diebolt, C., Haupert, M. (eds) Handbook of Cliometrics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_45-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_45-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40458-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40458-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Cliometrics and the Concept of Human Capital
    Published:
    06 December 2023

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_45-3

  2. Cliometrics and the Concept of Human Capital
    Published:
    25 May 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_45-2

  3. Original

    Cliometrics and the Concept of Human Capital
    Published:
    13 February 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40458-0_45-1