Skip to main content

Risk Characterization in Regulatory Toxicology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Regulatory Toxicology

Abstract

Risk characterization is the final step in the risk assessment process. All scientific data are summarized, reviewed, and evaluated in an integrated manner. Risk characterization should provide a clear description of the potential risk and outline the strengths and weaknesses of the whole risk assessment process. This includes a description of all assumptions and uncertainties of applied procedures, as well as a delineation of how the decision-making process.

Maged Younes has retired

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amzal B, Julin B, Vahter M, Johanson G, Wolk A, Åkesson A (2009) Population toxicokinetic modeling of cadmium for health risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 117(8):1293–1301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dorne JCM (2010) Metabolism, variability and risk assessment. Toxicology 268(3):156–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dybing E, Doe J, Groten I, Kleine J, O’Brien J, Schlatter J, Steinberg P, Tritscher A, Walker R, Younes M (2002) Hazard characterization of chemicals in food and diet: dose–response, mechanisms and extarpolation issues. Food Chem Toxicol 40:237–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2006) Panel on dietetic products, Nutrition and allergies. Tolerable upper intake levels for vitamins and minerals. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/efsa_rep/blobserver_assets/ndatolerableuil.pdf

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2009) Scientific opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on cadmium in food. EFSA J 980:1–139. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/doc/980.pdf

  • EFSA (European Food SafetyAuthority) (2017a) EFSA Scientific Committee, Hardy A, Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen KH, More S, Mortensen A, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Aerts M, Bodin L, Davis A, Edler L, Gundert-Remy U, Sand S, Slob W, Bottex B, Abrahantes JC, Marques DC, Kass G and Schlatter JR (2017) Update: Guidance on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA J 15(1):4658, 41pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4658

  • EFSA (European Food SafetyAuthority) (2017b) EFSA Scientific Committee, Hardy A, Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen HK, More S, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Benfenati E, Chaudhry QM, Craig P, Frampton G, Greiner M, Hart A, Hogstrand C, Lambre C, Luttik R, Makowski D, Siani A, Wahlstroem H, Aguilera J, Dorne J-L, Fernandez Dumont A, Hempen M, Valtue~naMartınez S, Martino L, Smeraldi C, Terron A, Georgiadis N and Younes M (2017) Scientific Opinion on the guidance on the use of the weight of evidence approach in scientific assessments. EFSA J 15(8):4971, 69pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) and WHO (World Health Organization) (2016) Review of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach and development of new TTC decision tree. EFSA Support Publ 13(3):EN-1006, 50pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.EN-1006

  • JMPR (Joint FAO/WHO Meetings on Pesticide Residues) (2002) Report of the JMPR. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper, 172. FAO, Rome, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes R, Galli C, Munro I, Schilter B, Tran L, Walker R, Würtzen G (2000) Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing. Food Chem Toxicol 38(2–3):255–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muri SD, Schlatter JR, Brüschweiler BJ (2009) The benchmark dose approach in food risk assessment: is it applicable and worthwhile? Food Chem Toxicol 47:2906–2925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Recommended Reading

  • Boobis AR, Doe JE, Heinrich-Hirsch B, (Bette) Meek ME, Munn S, Ruchirawat M, Schlatter J, Seed J, Vickers C (2008) IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans. Crit Rev Toxicol 38:87–96 | Published online. 10 Oct 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440701749421

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2017) EFSA Scientific Committee, Hardy A, Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen HK, More S, Mortensen A, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Bresson J-L, Griffin J, HougaardBenekou S, van Loveren H, Luttik R, Messean A, Penninks A, Ru G, Stegeman JA, van der Werf W, Westendorf J, Woutersen RA, Barizzone F, Bottex B, Lanzoni A, Georgiadis N and Jan Alexander (2017) Guidance on Biological Relevance. EFSA J 15(7):4970, 204pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4970

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2018) EFSAScientific Committee, Benford D, Halldorsson T, Jeger MJ, Knutsen HK, More S, Naegeli H, Noteborn H, Ockleford C, Ricci A, Rychen G, Schlatter JR, Silano V, Solecki R, Turck D, Younes M, Craig P, Hart A, Von Goetz N, Koutsoumanis K, Mortensen A, Ossendorp B, Martino L, Merten C, Mosbach-Schulz O, Hardy A (2018) Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessments. EFSA J 16(1):5123, 39pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5123

  • FNB (Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine (US) Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes) (1997) Dietary reference intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D, and fluoride. National Academies Press (US), Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Series on Adverse Outcome Pathways. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-series-on-adverse-outcome-pathways_2415170x

  • Vermeire T, Stevenson H, Pieters MN, Rennen M, Slob W, Hakkert BC (1999) Assessment factors for human risk assessment: a discussion paper. Crit Rev Toxicol 29:439–490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weed DL (2005) Weight of evidence: a review of concept and methods. Risk Anal 25:1545–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1999) Principles of the assessment of risks to human health from exposure to chemicals. Environmental health criteria, vol 210. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO) (2009) Food Safety. Project to update the principles and methods for the assessment of chemicals in food. Principles and methods for the risk assessment of chemicals in food. EHC 240. ISBN 978-92-4-157240-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Younes M, Meek ME, Hertel RF, Gibb H, Schaum J (1999) Risk assessment and management. In: Herzstein JA, Bunn WB, Fleming LE, Harrington JM, Jeyaratnam J, Gardner IR (eds) International occupational and environmental medicine. Mosby, St Louis, p 62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maged Younes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Georgiadis, N., Younes, M. (2020). Risk Characterization in Regulatory Toxicology. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_74-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_74-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics