Skip to main content

Biomolecules Versus Smaller Chemicals in Toxicology: ICH, EU, and US Recommendations

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Regulatory Toxicology

Abstract

For many life science professionals, biological products represent the cutting edge of medical research and are the smartest means to target and treat a variety of disease and conditions for which the current treatments are still unsatisfactory. In contrast to small molecule drugs, including new chemical entities (NCEs), biomolecules (also called biologics, biologicals, biopharmaceuticals, or biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals) are complex macromolecules, sometimes occurring as mixtures that are not easily identified or fully characterized. Nevertheless, due to the rapid development of biotechnology in the last three decades, the number of approved biomolecules is increasing at a faster rate than it is the case for new chemical entities. Biologicals are usually highly specific for a target, are more heat sensitive and susceptible to microbial contamination, and are likely antigenic. Thus, the quality and security testing of biologicals is becoming increasingly important. This updated chapter compares the evolving regulatory environment relevant for biomolecules, with a typical “case-by-case” development program versus NCEs, which are generally developed according to a more standard “classical” manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Peer-Reviewed Articles

  • Baumann A (2009) Nonclinical development of biopharmaceuticals. Drug Discov Today 14(23–24):1112–1122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brinks V (2011) Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: the use of animal models. Pharm Res 28:2379–2385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carfagna MA, Bjerregaard TG, Fukushima T, Houser W, Sloan C, Snyder K, Anderson J, Page T (2020) SEND harmonization & cross-study analysis: a proposal to better harvest the value from SEND data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 111:104542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demollari M (2019) Moving from unstructured to structured data – US nonclinical data standards. Regulatory Rapporteur 16:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawar G, Madden JC, Ebbrell D, Firman JW, Cronin MTD (2019) In silico toxicology data resources to support read-across and (Q)SAR. Front Pharmacol 10:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raies AB, Bajic VB (2016) In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 6:147–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rocca M, Morford LL, Blanset DL, Halpern WG, Cavagnaro J, Bowman CJ (2018) Applying a weight of evidence approach to the evaluation of developmental toxicity of biopharmaceuticals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 98:69–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg AS (2003) Immunogenicity of biological therapeutics: a hierarchy of concerns. Dev Biol (Basel) 112:15–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau C, Crozatier C, duVerle DA, Buyse M, Carter SE, Voisin EM, Boissel FH (2019) A regulatory landscape shift for in silico clinical trials. Regulatory Rapporteur 16:18–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwieterman WD (2006) Regulating biopharmaceuticals under CDER versus CBER: an insider’s perspective. Drug Discov Today 19–20:945–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H (2018) French phase I clinical trial disaster: issues, learning points and potential safety measures. J Nat Sci Biol Med 9:106–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suntharalingam G (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. New Engl J Med 355(10):1018–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vargesson N (2015) Review thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: history and mechanisms. Birth Defects Res C 105:140–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Regulatory Documents

  • EMA/CHMP/BWP/534898/2008 rev. 1 corrigendum (2018): Guideline on the requirements for quality documentation concerning biological investigational medicinal products in clinical trials

    Google Scholar 

  • EMA/CHMP/SWP/44609/2010 rev 1: Question and answers on ‘Guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEA/CHMP/BMWP/101695/2006: Guideline on comparability of biotechnology-derived medicinal products after a change in the manufacturing process non-clinical and clinical issues

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEA/CHMP/EWP/192217/2009: Guideline on bioanalytical method validation

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07 Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human clinical trials with investigational medicinal products

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07(R1)/2017: Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human and early clinical trials with investigational medicinal products

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00 corr 2/2006: Guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use

    Google Scholar 

  • EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00 Rev 1/draft/2018: Guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Guidance for Industry (1998) Environmental assessment of human drug and biologics applications

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Guidance for Industry (2005) Estimating the maximum safe starting dose in initial clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Guidance for Industry (2008) Safety testing of drug metabolites

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Guidance for Industry (2016) Environmental assessment: question and answers regarding drugs with estrogenic, androgenic or thyroid activity

    Google Scholar 

  • FDA Guidance for Industry (2019) Immunogenicity testing of therapeutic protein products – developing and validating assays for anti-drug antibody detection. Can be downloaded from https://www.fda.gov/media/119788/download

  • FDA Guidance: all the FDA Guidance listed in this document and their corresponding associated files can be freely downloaded on the https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents website

  • ICH guidelines: all the ICH guidelines listed in this document and their corresponding associated files can be freely downloaded on the https://www.ich.org website

  • ICH Status Report (2019). The ICHS1 regulatory testing paradigm of carcinogenicity in rats – status report 019. Safety Guidelines https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/S1_StatusReport_2019_0802.pdf

  • Notice to Applicants Volume 2A (2016) Procedures for marketing authorization. Can be downloaded from https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-2/vol2a_chap1_rev6_201612.pdf

Download references

Disclaimer

Any views and opinions expressed in this article chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of any institutions the authors are associated with.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Ruthsatz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ruthsatz, M., Chiavaroli, C., Cassar, M.A., Voisin, E.M. (2020). Biomolecules Versus Smaller Chemicals in Toxicology: ICH, EU, and US Recommendations. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_57-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_57-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics