Abstract
This chapter is primarily written for scientists concerned with the assessment of risks for human health or the environment and involved in communicating and explaining scientific risk issues to the public. Besides following basic rules of good communication, risk experts have to find solutions to overcome specific barriers in the dialogue with differently educated protagonists of the public, i.e., laymen, stakeholders, well-informed citizens, other experts, and also with public media. This includes adapting the dialogue to the audience, to explain complex scientific facts and their legal context perspicuously, and to achieve trust and a truthful dialogue atmosphere when discussing with citizens or stakeholders. Eventually, the risk expert should contribute to reach agreements or other options (including disagreements) when discussing risks. For the interaction with public media, the risk expert should keep particular rules in mind. In conclusion, awareness of obstacles in communication and acquiring special communication skills and training are mandatory for scientists in the role of risk experts before discussing risks in a public setting.
Institutions involved in risk communication issues, such as many authorities and enterprises, should develop concepts and long-term strategies to build up confidence as an indispensable basis of successful risk communication. Essential prerequisites of such confidence are i) scientific competence and legal independence of the risk experts within the institution (as far as possible by contract) and ii) transparency and a two-way communication between the institution, stakeholders, and the public.
References
COM (2000) Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. 1 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52000DC0001&from=EN; http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52000DC0001
European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) (2011) EFSA Procedures for responding to urgent advice needs. Technical report. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/en-102
European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) (2017) When food is cooking up a storm. Proven recipes for risk communication. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/corporate_publications/files/riskcommguidelines170524.pdf
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization (FAO and WHO) (2016) Risk communication applied to food safety: handbook. Food safety and quality series 2. ISSN 2415-1173. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5863e.pdf
German Advisory Council on the Environment (Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen, SRU) (1999) Umwelt und Gesundheit- Risiken richtig einschätzen. Sondergutachten (in German). http://www.umweltrat.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/02_Sondergutachten/1999_SG_UmweltundGesundheit.html
OECD (2002) Guidance document on risk communication for chemical risk management. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Risk Management no. 16. ENV/JM/MONO 18. 25 July 2002, Paris. http://search.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ENV/JM/MONO%282002%2918&docLanguage=En
Schulz von Thun F (1998) Miteinander Reden, Teil 1, Störungen und Klärungen; Teil 2, Stile, Werte und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung, Sachbuch 60606. Teil 3, Das “Innere Team”und situationsgerechte Kommunikation, Sachbuch 60545. Rowohlt, Hamburg (in German)
SFK (1997) Accident Commission/Störfall-Kommission (SFK) Guide for plant safety. SFK-GS-06. https://www.kas-bmu.de/reports-in-english.html
WHO (2004) IPCS risk assessment terminology. Part 1: IPCS/OECD key generic terms used in chemical Hazard/risk assessment; Part 2: IPCS glossary of key exposure assessment terminology. Harmonized Project Document No 1. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/methods/harmonization/en/index.html
Wiedemann PM, Clauberg M, Börner F (2011) Risk communication for companies. Fischer Verlag. http://www.wiedemannonline.com/blog/wp-content/materialien/downloads/Risk%20communication%20for%20companies.pdf
Recommended Reading
Renn O (2008) Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan, London. ISBN 978-1-84407-291-0; 978-1-84407-292-7
Resources
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/healthcommunication/risks/index.html
Four-sides model of communication. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-sides_model
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lilienblum, W., Lilienblum, M. (2020). Risk Communication: Challenges for Toxicologists and Other Risk Experts. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_119-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_119-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences