Abstract
In general, test data for mixtures are available only in rare cases. For a hazard assessment, a common surrogate method is to delineate their hazard potential from data of individual ingredients. Another approach exists to extrapolate from mixtures with test data to nontested mixtures. Such bridging principles have been in use in certain sector-specific applications already in the past. With the adoption of the new globally harmonized system for classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS), bridging principles gained a broad regulatory acceptance for the hazard assessment of mixtures. In order to make use of the principles, strong formal requirements must be fulfilled. This chapter describes the various applicable principles, such as the principle of “dilution,” “concentration,” “interpolation,” and “batching” of “substantially similar mixtures.”
Another way for the assessment of a mixture is the weight of evidence approach leading to an expert judgment. It is less formal, but it suffers from legal certainty and may be challenged more frequently by third parties.
Abbreviations
- BfR:
-
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung)
- C&L:
-
Classification and labeling
- CMR:
-
Carcinogenic, mutagenic, reproductive toxicant
- CSR:
-
Chemical safety report
- DNEL:
-
Derived No-Effect Level
- DU:
-
Downstream user
- ECHA:
-
European Chemicals Agency
- ES:
-
Exposure Scenario
- eSDS:
-
Extended Safety Data Sheet
- GHS:
-
Globally harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals
- GLP:
-
Good Laboratory Practice
- IUCLID:
-
International Uniform Chemical Information Database
- NOAEL:
-
No Observed Adverse Effect Level
- PBT:
-
Persistent, Bioaccumulative, Toxic
- PCC:
-
Poison control centers
- POD:
-
Point-of-departure
- RMM:
-
Risk Management Measures
- SEA:
-
Socio-economic analysis
- SIEF:
-
Substance Information Exchange Forum
- SME:
-
Small or Medium Enterprise
- SVHC:
-
Substances of Very High Concern
- vPvB:
-
Very Persistent very Bioaccumulative
References
ECHA (2017) Guidance on the application of the CLP criteria. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23036412/clp_en.pdf/58b5dc6d-ac2a-4910-9702-e9e1f5051cc5
European Detergents Association (AISE) (1993) AISE/IKW trustee expert model. http://www.ikw.org/haushaltspflege/themen/informationen-fuer-hersteller/trustee-expert-model-treuhaendergutachter-modelltgm/f5127bd59cb449c96e3bb30c34ebe2d3/
European Union (2008) Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006
Klimisch HJ et al (1997) A systematic approach to evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 25:1–5
United Nations (2005) Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) first revised edition. United Nations, New York/Geneva. ISBN 92-1-116927-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Aulmann, W., Pechacek, N. (2020). Assessment of Mixtures: Bridging Principles and Other Approaches. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_114-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_114-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences