Abstract
Past applications of spatial regression models have frequently interpreted the parameter estimates of models that include spatial lags of the dependent variable incorrectly. A discussion of issues surrounding proper interpretation of the estimates from a variety of spatial regression models is undertaken. We rely on scalar summary measures proposed by LeSage and Pace (Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009) who motivate that these reflect a proper interpretation of the marginal effects for the nonlinear models involving spatial lags of the dependent variable. These nonlinear spatial models are contrasted with linear spatial models, where interpretation is more straightforward. One of the major advantages of spatial regression models is their ability to quantify spatial spillovers. These can be defined as situations where nonzero cross-partial derivatives exist that reflect impacts on outcomes in region i arising from changes in characteristics of region j. Of course, these cross-partial derivatives can be interpreted as impacts of changes in an own region characteristic on other regions or changes in another regions’ characteristic on the own region. The ability to produce empirical estimates along with measures of dispersion that can be used for inference regarding the statistical significance, magnitude, and spatial extent of spillovers provides a major motivation for using spatial regression models.
References
Allers M, Elhorst JP (2005) Tax mimicking and yardstick competition among local governments in the Netherlands. Int Tax Public Financ 12(4):493–513
Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Anselin L (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers and spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2):153–166
Bell KP, Bockstael NE (2000) Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. Rev Econ Stat 87(1):72–82
Bivand R, Albrecht G (2000) Implementing functions for spatial statistical analysis using the R language. J Geogr Syst 2(3):307–317
Crane R, Chatman D (2004) Traffic and sprawl: evidence from U.S. commuting, 1985–1997. Plan Mark 6(3):14–22
Deskins J, Hill B (2010) Have state tax interdependencies changed over time? Public Financ Rev 38(2):244–270
Drukker DM, Prucha I, Raciborski R (2001) A command for estimating spatial-autoregressive models with spatial-autoregressive disturbances and additional endogenous variables. Stata J 1(3):1–13
Elhorst JP (2010) Applied spatial econometrics: raising the bar. Spat Econ Anal 5(1):9–28
Fingleton B (2001) Theoretical economic geography and spatial econometrics: dynamic perspectives. J Econ Geogr 1(2):201–225
Gordon P, Lee B, Richardson HW (2009) Commuting trends in U.S. cities in the 1990s. J Plan Educ Res 29(1):78–89
Haining R (1990) Spatial data analysis in the social and environmental sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kelejian HH, Tavlas GS, Hondronyiannis G (2006) A spatial modeling approach to contagion among emerging economies. Open Econ Rev 17(4/5):423–442
Kim CW, Phipps TT, Anselin L (2003) Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement: a spatial hedonic approach. J Environ Econ Manag 45(1):24–39
Kirby DK, LeSage JP (2009) Changes in commuting to work times over the 1990 to 2000 period. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39(4):460–471
LeSage JP (1999) The theory and practice of spatial econometrics, a manual to accompany the spatial econometrics toolbox. Freely available at: www.spatialeconometrics.com
LeSage JP, Ha C (2012) The impact of migration on social capital – do migrants take their bowling balls with them? Growth Chang 43(1):1–26
LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. Taylor Francis/CRC Press, Boca Raton
Ord JK (1975) Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. J Am Stat Assoc 70(3):120–126
Pace RK, LeSage JP (2008) A spatial Hausman test. Econ Lett 101(3):282–284
Pace RK, Zhu S (2012) Separable spatial modeling of spillovers and disturbances. J Geogr Syst 14(1):75–90
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
LeSage, J.P., Pace, R.K. (2019). Interpreting Spatial Econometric Models. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_91-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_91-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences