Skip to main content

Argumentation and Voting for an Intelligent User Empowering Business Directory on the Web

  • Conference paper
Web Reasoning and Rule Systems (RR 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7497))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We describe a new argumentation method for analysing opinion exchanges between on-line users aiding them to draw informative, structured and meaningful information. Our method combines different factors, such as social support drawn from votes and attacking/supporting relations between opinions interpreted as abstract arguments. We show a prototype web application which puts into use this method to offer an intelligent business directory allowing users to engage in debate and aid them to extract the dominant, emerging public opinion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks (June 2004), ftp://ftp.irit.fr/pub/IRIT/RPDMP/article-nmr04.ps.gz

  2. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and N-persons games (October 16, 1995), http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/7707.html , http://www.di.unipi.it/~paolo/KIT011/dungpapers/arg-fin.ps.Z

  3. Gabbriellini, S., Torroni, P.: Microdebates for policy-making. In: 3rd International Conference on Computational Sustainability, CompSust 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 5-6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leite, J., Martins, J.: Social abstract argumentation. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 2287–2292. IJCAI/AAAI (2011), http://ijcai.org/papers11/Papers/IJCAI11-381.pdf

  5. Matt, P.A., Toni, F.: A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation. In: Hölldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds.) JELIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5293, pp. 285–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Toni, F., Torroni, P.: Bottom-Up Argumentation. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS, vol. 7132, pp. 249–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Evripidou, V., Toni, F. (2012). Argumentation and Voting for an Intelligent User Empowering Business Directory on the Web. In: Krötzsch, M., Straccia, U. (eds) Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7497. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33203-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33202-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33203-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics