Abstract
Despite progress made through research and debate, there is still no universal consensus on how best to manage quality within Higher Education Institution (HEI). The key reason is that quality is a complex and multi-faceted construct, particularly in HEI. Quality of service offered cannot be directly observed before consumption. This makes comparing universities extremely difficult, or practically impossible. The aim of this study is to develop a conceptual framework for measuring service quality in HEI by applying the emerging concept of service dominant logic. This paper provides a new paradigm for the measurement of service quality in Higher education based on the emerging discipline of service science. It describes a framework that we have proposed that can be used to measure the quality of service in HEI. The framework is developed through the co-creation of value between students and the staffs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Balanced Scorecard Report 10(4), 9 (viewed on February 12, 2010), https://ssl.instantaccess.com/bscol/articles/docs/5.pdf
Becket, N., Brooke, M.: Quality Management Practice in Higher Education – What Quality Are We Actually Enhancing? Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 7(1), 40–54 (2008)
Bekhradnia, B., Whitnall, C., Sastry, T.: The Academic Experience of Students in English Universities. Higher Education Policy Institute, London (2006)
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing 49, 41–50 (1985)
Chell, E.: Critical incident technique. In: Symon, G., Cassell, C. (eds.) Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organisational Research: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications, London (1998)
Churchill, G.A.: A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Keting Research 16, 64–73 (1979)
Cuthbert, P.F.: Managing Service Quality in HE: is SERVQUAL the answer? Part 1. Managing Service Quality 6(2), 11–16 (1996)
Grönroos, C.: Service management and marketing. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex (2000)
Hill, Y., Lomas, L., McGregor, J.: Students Perceptions of Quality in Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education 11(1), 15–20 (2003)
Joseph, M., Joseph, B.: Service Quality in Education: a Student Perspective. Quality Assurance in Education 5(1), 15–21 (1997)
Joseph, M., Yakhou, M., Stone, G.: An educational institution’s quest for service quality: customers’ perspective. Quality Assurance in Education 13(1), 66–82 (2005)
Kotler, P., Fox, K.: Strategic Marketing for Educational Organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)
O’Neill, M., Palmer, A.: Importance-performance analysis: a useful tool for directing continuous quality improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education 12(1), 39–52 (2004)
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., Berry, L.: A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 41–50 (Fall 1985)
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1), 14–40 (1988)
Perisau, S.E., McDaniel, J.R.: Assessing service quality in school of business. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 14(3), 204–218 (1996)
Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston (2004a)
Ramaswamy, V., Gouillart, F.: Co-creating strategy with experience co-creation (2008)
Spohrer, J., et al.: Steps Toward a Science of Service Systems, pp. 71–77. IEEE Computer Society (2007)
Sporher, J., Vargo, S.L., Caswell, N., Maglia, P.P.: The service system is the basic abstraction of Service Science. In: Proceedings of the 41st International Hawaii Conference on System Sciences (2008)
Srikanthan, G., Dalrymple, J.: Developing a Holistic Model for Quality in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education 8(3), 216–224 (2002)
Stauss, B.: Using the critical incident technique in measuring and managing service quality. In: Scheuing, E., William, F.C. (eds.) The Service Quality Handbook, pp. 408–427. American Management Association, New York (1993)
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving To a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing (68), 1–17 (2004)
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Service-Dominant Logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academic Marketing Science 36, 1–10 (2008a)
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: A Service Logic for Service Science. In: Hefley, B., Murphy, W. (eds.) Service Science, Management and Engineering: Education for the 21st Century, pp. 82–87. Springer (2008b)
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: The Service Dominant Mindset. In: Hefley, B., Murphy, W. (eds.) Service Science, Management and Engineering: Education for the 21st Measurement of Service Quality on Higher Education Institution by Applying Service Dominant Logic Concept Page 166 century, pp.88-94 (2008c) (Online)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zulkefli, N., Uden, L. (2013). A Service Quality Framework for Higher Education from the Perspective of Service Dominant Logic. In: Uden, L., Herrera, F., Bajo Pérez, J., Corchado Rodríguez, J. (eds) 7th International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations: Service and Cloud Computing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30867-3_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30867-3_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30866-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30867-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)