Skip to main content

Special Civil Law as a Sign of Political Identity: A Constitutional Approach to the Case of the Valencian Community

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain
  • 941 Accesses

Abstract

We seek to clarify the political terminology and meaning of what is contained in the Valencian Statute in the light of the (far more developed and diverse) doctrinal and jurisprudential contributions to arise from the demands of other autonomous communities. This is necessary after the 2006 reform of the Valencian Statute, due to the tendency towards historical law evident therein, and is also essential if progress is to be made towards the constitutional reform that will bring to a close the evolution of the Autonomous State into an ordered Federal State.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For all of these, and the Valencian perspective, Vivancos Comes (2005).

  2. 2.

    Vivancos Comes (2005), p. 229 et seq.

  3. 3.

    With very few exceptions: see Mayol (2003), pp. 291–295.

  4. 4.

    Izquierdo Tolsada (2007), pp. 331–381.

  5. 5.

    Ragel Sanchez (2005) (p. 13) expressly refers to the text of the Valencian Statute in the following terms: “The aim is now to include a reference to historical law (Derecho Foral) and to remove the word “civil”. Yet, when regulating the exclusive legislative power of the Catalonian Regional Government, the Statute of Catalonia makes clear reference to the “preservation, modification and implementation of Catalonian civil law”, without restricting itself to what it is considered Catalonian civil historical law. We feel the term “civil” to be more appropriate than “historical” (foral), although we also feel the best expression to be “own civil” or “special civil”.

  6. 6.

    Montes Penades (2007), pp. 261 et seq.

  7. 7.

    Thus, and in various notes, reference is made to Peset Reig (1972, p. 657 et seq.) or in note 20 to Simo Santonja (1979).

  8. 8.

    Montes Rodríguez (2008).

  9. 9.

    Ballarin Hernandez (2010), pp. 18–19.

  10. 10.

    Domínguez Calatayud (2004); Blasco Gasco and Clemente Meoro (1989), p. 117 et seq.

  11. 11.

    Blasco Gascó (2011), p. 22 or López Beltrán de Heredia (2000), p. 64.

  12. 12.

    Also put forward in other areas, such as Arechederra Aranzadi (1992), pp. 491–511, particularly p. 498.

  13. 13.

    Bataller Ruiz, p. 7.

  14. 14.

    Sanchez Ferriz (2008), pp. 14–35.

  15. 15.

    By everybody, Ortega, Luis, Reforma constitucional y…, already cited. In the same critical sense with the “centrifuge” method used in Spain, most of the doctrine may be cited. One example that may be cited is Corcuera Atienza (2009), p. 70.

  16. 16.

    Cf. Ragel Sanchez (2005) p. 3 et seq, Blasco Gasco (2011, p. 23), or Moliner Navarro (2007), p. 364.

  17. 17.

    Herrero de Miñon (1998), p. 54 et seq.

  18. 18.

    Montes Penades (2007), pp. 281–82.

  19. 19.

    Herrero de Miñón (2009), pp. 4–12.

  20. 20.

    García Pelayo (1991), p. 3171 et seq.

  21. 21.

    Cf. Tajadura Tejada (2009), pp. 147–174, particularly 168, et seq.

  22. 22.

    Tomás y Valiente (1995).

  23. 23.

    Clavero Salvador (1982).

  24. 24.

    Thus expressed by Solozábal Echavarria (1998), Corcuera Atienza and García Herrera (2002). A well-rounded summary of the varying doctrinal positions concerning the famous First Additional Provision may be consulted in Tudela Aranda (2009), p. 63 et seq.

  25. 25.

    Corcuera Atienza (1985), pp. 55–89.

  26. 26.

    Ibidem, p. 56.

  27. 27.

    Ibidem, p. 76: “la autonomía aparece como superación de la foralidad y la foralidad como resistencia –o, al menos, reticencia- ante la autonomía…”

  28. 28.

    Sainz Arnaiz (2004), p. 53, or Tudela Aranda (2009) p. 78.

  29. 29.

    Tudela Aranda (2009), p. 72 et seq.

  30. 30.

    Sevilla et al. (2009), p. 184 et seq. and pp. 209–210.

  31. 31.

    Today, quite a number of Catalonian jurists continue to defend the application of the First Additional Provision of the Spanish Constitution. For instance, Vernet i Llobet et al. (2011), p. 125 et seq.

  32. 32.

    López Basaguren (2007), p. 5 et seq., in which he develops the “overflowing of the dispositive principle”.

  33. 33.

    Tudela Aranda (2009), p. 589, cit.

  34. 34.

    Torres del Moral (2007–2008), pp. 55–79.

  35. 35.

    Cf. Tajadura Tejada (2008), pp. 137–192.

  36. 36.

    Tajadura Tejada (2009), p. 172, cit.

  37. 37.

    For all, Vernet (2011), p. 127, op. cit.

  38. 38.

    Blasco Gascó (2011), p. 22.

  39. 39.

    Aparicio Perez (2002) (pp. 29–57).

  40. 40.

    López Basaguren (2007), p. 16, cit.

  41. 41.

    The term civil, which appeared in the final text, did not form part of the proposal.

  42. 42.

    We should also perhaps recall that, on this occasion, the proposal stressed more the term historical (foral) when referring to “historical and Valencian Law”.

  43. 43.

    An interesting remark concerning constitutional court ruling 88/93 with the doctrine on the term “implementation” and its eventual application to the Region of Valencia, in Montes Penades (2007), p. 294 cit., et seq.

  44. 44.

    Blasco Gascó (2011), p. 24.

  45. 45.

    It has, however, been justified as one of the many ways of avoiding open confrontation between Constitution and Statutes. Cf. López Basaguren (2007), p. 4 cit.

  46. 46.

    Logendio Irure (1985).

  47. 47.

    Rey Martinez (2006), pp. 69–102.

  48. 48.

    Ibid, p. 91.

  49. 49.

    For all of them, see Tudela Aranda (2009), p. 91, cit.

  50. 50.

    Rey Martinez (2006), p. 85, cit.

  51. 51.

    The idea had also been defended with regard to the Basque Country by, amongst others, Tomás y Valiente (1979), p. 28. The author referred to the second part of the First Additional Provision of the Spanish Constitution in the following terms: “This clarification underlines the principle of constitutional supremacy; such that updating both historical rights inherited from the past and in force today as well as the drafting of completely new rules, valid in “historical territories” or even in potential future autonomous communities which may not have enjoyed a special or historical legal system … shall always be carried out by applying the stipulations laid down in the corresponding Statutes of Autonomy, which in turn should always be understood within the terms of the present Constitution”.

  52. 52.

    It sets out the following: “self-government in Catalonia is also based on the historical rights of the Catalonian people, its secular institutions and on Catalonian legal tradition, which the present Statute incorporates and updates under article 2, the second transitory provision and other precepts of the Constitution”.

  53. 53.

    Sainz Arnaiz (2004), p. 53 et seq.

  54. 54.

    Ragel Sanchez (2005), p. 3.

References

  • APARICIO PEREZ, Miguel Ángel, “Aproximación a la regulación contenida en el texto de la constitución española de 1978 sobre la distribución territorial del poder político”, in M.A. Aparicio, La descentralización y el Federalismo. Nuevos modelos de Autonomía Política (España, Bélgica, Canadá, Italia y Reino Unido). Barcelona, Cedecs, 2002 (pages 29–57).

    Google Scholar 

  • ARECHEDERRA ARANZADI, Luis Ignacio, Art. 48, in Comentarios al Estatuto de Autonomía de la Comunidad Autónoma de Navarra. Madrid, MAP, 1992, pp. 491–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • BALLARIN HERNANDEZ, Rafael, Prologue to MAS BADIA, Mª Dolores (coordinator) El Régimen Económico Matrimonial de la Comunidad Valencia, Madrid, Tecnos, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • BATALLER RUIZ, Enric, Derecho Civil Autonómico en España: Génesis y perspectivas, en Revista de Derecho civil valenciano, available on the Internet: http://derechocivilvalenciano.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=66&Itemid=29.

  • BLASCO GASCO, Francisco y CLEMENTE MEORO, Mario, “La sucesión intestada en favor de la Generalitat Valenciana y la condición jurídica de valenciano”, en Libro en recuerdo a la Profesora Silvia Romeu. Valencia, 1989, vol. I, pages 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • BLASCO GASCÓ, Francisco, “La competencia legislativa de la Generalitat Valenciana en materia de Derecho Civil”, Revista Jurídica de la Comunidad Valenciana (RJCV), issue 33 (2011), pages 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLAVERO SALVADOR, Bartolomé, El Código y el Fuero: de la cuestión regional en la España contemporánea, Madrid, Siglo XXI de España, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • CORCUERA ATIENZA, Javier, Notas sobre el debate de los derechos históricos de los territorios forales, en R.E.P. (nueva época) 46–47, 1985, pages 55–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • CORCUERA ATIENZA, Javier y GARCÍA HERRERA, Miguel Ángel, La constitucionalización de los derechos históricos. Madrid, CEPC, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • CORCUERA ATIENZA, Javier, Las reformas del modelo territorial en Alemania y en España: dos lógicas diferentes, in TUDELA ARANDA, José y KÖLLING, Mario (eds.), La reforma del Estado Autonómico español y el Estado Federal Alemán. Madrid, CEPC, 2009, page 70.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOMÍNGUEZ CALATAYUD Vicente, Posibilidades constitucionales de una plena recuperación de nuestro Derecho Foral Civil, Valencia, Corts Valencianes, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • GARCÍA PELAYO, in El País 24 September, 1978, in Obras Completas. Madrid, 1991, III, p. 3171 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • IZQUIERDO TOLSADA, Mariano, Nuevos Estatutos de Autonomía y legiferación civil, in Derecho Privado y Constitución, issue 21, CEPC, 2007, pages 331–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOGENDIO IRURE, Ignacio María, “La disposición Adicional Primera y los derechos históricos”, in RVAP, 1985, issue 12, pages 95–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • LÓPEZ BELTRÁN DE HEREDIA, Carmen, “El Derecho civil valenciano en el momento presente: vías de creación y desarrollo”, in Carmen López Beltrán de Heredia (coord.), Curso de Derecho civil valenciano, Valencia, RGD, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • LÓPEZ BASAGUREN, Alberto, El Contenido Constitucional de los Estatutos de Autonomía en Web Fundación Giménez Abad, 2007. Available at http://www.fundacionmgimenezabad.es/images/Documentos/2009/20091218_ot_lopez_basaguren_a_es_o.pdf.

  • HERRERO DE MIÑON, Miguel, Derechos Históricos y Constitución. Madrid, Taurus, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • HERRERO DE MIÑÓN, Miguel, Los derechos históricos cara al siglo XXI, in Revista de pensamiento e historia, 2009, issue 32, pages 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOLINER NAVARRO, Rosa, “Las competencias en materia de Derecho civil foral a la luz del artículo 49.1.2ª del nuevo Estatuto de Autonomía de la Comunidad Valenciana”, in Corts. Anuario de Derecho Parlamentario, 2007, issue 18, pages 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONTES RODRÍGUEZ, Mª Pilar, Competencia legislativa de la Comunidad Autónoma Valenciana en materia de Derecho civil, in Revista Jurídica de la Comunidad Valenciana. Valencia, Tirant, issue 25/2008, pages 530.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONTES PENADES, Vicente L. “El Derecho Foral valenciano. Un estudio sobre la competencia legislativa de la Generalitat en materia de Derecho Civil”, in BAÑO LEON, José María, Comentario al Estatuto de Autonomía de la Comunidad Valenciana. Madrid, Civitas, 2007, pages 261–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • PESET REIG, Mariano (amongst other works, “Notas sobre la abolición de los Fueros de Valencia”, AHDE, XLII, 1972, pages 657 et seq.).

    Google Scholar 

  • RAGEL SANCHEZ, Luis Felipe, (Las competencias legislativas en materia de Derecho civil y su deseable reforma constitucional, in Revista de Derecho Privado, 2005, issues 7–8, pages 3–17).

    Google Scholar 

  • REY MARTINEZ, Fernando “El concepto de “derechos históricos” en la reforma de los Estatutos de Autonomía”, in Cuadernos de Alzate, issue 34, 2006, pages 69-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAINZ ARNAIZ, Alejandro “Hecho diferencial y reconocimiento nacional en el Estatuto de Autonomía”, in VV. AA. Estudios sobre la reforma del Estatuto. Barcelona, Institut d’ Estudis Autonòmics, 2004, pages 47–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • SANCHEZ FERRIZ, Remedio, El Estado de las Autonomías antes y después de 2006, in Revista Valenciana de Estudis Autonomics, 2008, issue 51, pages 14–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEVILLA, Jordi, VIDAL BELTRAN, José Mª y ELIAS MENDEZ, Cristina, Vertebrando España. El Estado Autonómico. Madrid, Biblioteca Nueva, 2009, pages 184 et seq. and pages 209–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • SIMO SANTONJA, Vicente, Derecho histórico valenciano (Pasado, presente y futuro) Valencia, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOLOZÁBAL ECHAVARRIA, Juan José, amongst whose works it is suffice to cite: Las bases constitucionales del Estado autonómico. Madrid, Mc Graw Hill, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAJADURA TEJADA, Javier, “Legitimidad democrática frente a legitimidad histórica”, in Teoria y Realidad, 2008, issue 22, pages 137–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAJADURA TEJADA, Javier “Manuel García Pelayo y los Derechos Históricos”, in Revista de Derecho Político UNED, issues 75–76, 2009, pages 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOMÁS Y VALIENTE, Francisco, “Los derechos históricos de Euskadi”, in Sistema. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 1979, issue 31, pages 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • TOMÁS Y VALIENTE, Francisco “Uniformidad y diversidad en las Comunidades Autónomas, en la legislación estatal y en la doctrina del Tribunal Constitucional”, Uniformidad o diversidad de las Comunidades Autónomas, Barcelona, Institut d’Estudis Autonómics, 1995, pages 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • TORRES DEL MORAL, Antonio, “¿Qué son los derechos históricos?”, in Ius Fugit, 15, 2007–2008, pages 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • TUDELA ARANDA, José, El Estado desconcertado y la necesidad federal. Pamplona, Civitas, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERNET i LLOBET, Jaume, Drets Historics, MONTAGUT ESTRAGUES, Tomas, Ruptura i transició a la democracia com a fonts de dos tipus de drets historics compatibles per a Catalunya, or FERRER JACAS, Joaquim, Els drets Historics, todos ellos en Revista Catalana de Dret Public, 2011, issue devoted to the STC 31/2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente GARRIDO MAYOL, “Las Competencias de la Generalitat Valenciana en materia de Derecho Civil: perspectivas de futuro”, Revista Valenciana d’Estudis Autonòmics (RVEA), issue 41/42 (2003), pages 291–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • VIVANCOS COMES, Mariano, La propuesta de Estatuto político de la Comunidad de Euskadi (“Ibarretxe Plan”), in Revista Española de la Función Consultiva, 2005, issue 4, pages 227–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remedio Sánchez Ferriz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferriz, R.S. (2013). Special Civil Law as a Sign of Political Identity: A Constitutional Approach to the Case of the Valencian Community. In: López - Basaguren, A., Escajedo San Epifanio, L. (eds) The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27717-7_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics