Skip to main content

Tight Space Bounds for ℓ-Exclusion

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing (DISC 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6950))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The simplest deadlock-free algorithm for mutual exclusion requires only one single-writer non-atomic bit per process [4,6,13]. This algorithm is known to be space optimal [5,6]. For over 20 years now it has remained an intriguing open problem whether a similar type of algorithm, which uses only one single-writer bit per process, exists also for ℓ-exclusion for some ℓ ≥ 2.

We resolve this longstanding open problem. For any ℓ and n, we provide a tight space bound on the number of single-writer bits required to solve ℓ-exclusion for n processes. It follows from our results that it is not possible to solve ℓ-exclusion with one single-writer bit per process, for any ℓ ≥ 2.

In an attempt to understand the inherent difference between the space complexity of mutual exclusion and that of ℓ-exclusion for ℓ ≥ 2, we define a weaker version of ℓ-exclusion in which the liveness property is relaxed, and show that, similarly to mutual exclusion, this weaker version can be solve using one single-writer non-atomic bit per process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afek, Y., Dolev, D., Gafni, E., Merritt, M., Shavit, N.: A bounded first-in, first-enabled solution to the ℓ-exclusion problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 16(3), 939–953 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Afek, Y., Stupp, G., Touitou, D.: Long-lived adaptive collect with applications. In: Proc. 40th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 262–272 (October 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, J.H., Moir, M.: Using local-spin k-exclusion algorithms to improve wait-free object implementations. Distributed Computing 11 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burns, J.E.: Mutual exclusion with linear waiting using binary shared variables. SIGACT News 10(2), 42–47 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns, J.E., Lynch, A.N.: Mutual exclusion using indivisible reads and writes. In: 18th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, pp. 833–842 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burns, J.N., Lynch, N.A.: Bounds on shared-memory for mutual exclusion. Information and Computation 107(2), 171–184 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dijkstra, E.W.: Solution of a problem in concurrent programming control. Communications of the ACM 8(9), 569 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dolev, D., Gafni, E., Shavit, N.: Toward a non-atomic era: ℓ-exclusion as a test case. In: Proc. 20th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing, pp. 78–92 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Burns, J.E., Borodin, A.: Resource allocation with immunity to limited process failure. In: Proc. 20th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 234–254 (October 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Burns, J.E., Borodin, A.: Distributed FIFO allocation of identical resources using small shared space. ACM Trans. on Programming Languages and Systems 11(1), 90–114 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. Journal of the ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamport, L.: On Interprocess Communication, Parts I and II. Distributed Computing 1(2), 77–101 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamport, L.: The mutual exclusion problem: Part II – statement and solutions. Journal of the ACM 33, 327–348 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Loui, M.C., Abu-Amara, H.: Memory requirements for agreement among unreliable asynchronous processes. Advances in Computing Research 4, 163–183 (1987)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson, G.L.: New bounds on mutual exclusion problems. Technical Report TR68, University of Rochester (February 1980) (Corrected, November 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peterson, G.L.: Observations on ℓ-exclusion. In: 28th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, pp. 568–577 (October 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taubenfeld, G.: Synchronization Algorithms and Concurrent Programming, 423 pages. Pearson / Prentice-Hall (2006) ISBN 0-131-97259-6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Taubenfeld, G. (2011). Tight Space Bounds for ℓ-Exclusion. In: Peleg, D. (eds) Distributed Computing. DISC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6950. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24100-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24100-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24099-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24100-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics