Skip to main content

Loop Formulas for Splitable Temporal Logic Programs

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6645))

Abstract

In this paper, we study a method for computing temporal equilibrium models, a generalisation of stable models for logic programs with temporal operators, as in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL). To this aim, we focus on a syntactic subclass of these temporal logic programs called splitable and whose main property is satisfying a kind of “future projected” dependence present in most dynamic scenarios in Answer Set Programming (ASP). Informally speaking, this property can be expressed as “past does not depend on the future.” We show that for this syntactic class, temporal equilibrium models can be captured by an LTL formula, that results from the combination of two well-known techniques in ASP: splitting and loop formulas. As a result, an LTL model checker can be used to obtain the temporal equilibrium models of the program.

This research was partially supported by Spanish MEC project TIN2009-14562-C05-04 and Xunta de Galicia project INCITE08-PXIB105159PR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Niemelä, I.: Logic programs with stable model semantics as a constraint programming paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25, 241–273 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Marek, V., Truszczyński, M.: Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm, pp. 169–181. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R.A., Bowen, K.A. (eds.) Logic Programming: Proc. of the Fifth International Conference and Symposium, vol. 2, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cabalar, P., Pérez Vega, G.: Temporal equilibrium logic: A first approach. In: Moreno Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada Arencibia, A. (eds.) EUROCAST 2007. LNCS, vol. 4739, pp. 241–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearce, D.: A new logical characterisation of stable models and answer sets. In: Dix, J., Przymusinski, T.C., Moniz Pereira, L. (eds.) NMELP 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1216. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearce, D.: Equilibrium logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 47(1-2), 3–41 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems: Specification. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Aguado, F., Cabalar, P., Pérez, G., Vidal, C.: Strongly equivalent temporal logic programs. In: Hölldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds.) JELIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5293, pp. 8–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabalar, P.: A normal form for linear temporal equilibrium logic. In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds.) JELIA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6341, pp. 64–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lifschitz, V., Turner, H.: Splitting a logic program. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Logic programming (ICLP 1994), pp. 23–37 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lin, F., Zhao, Y.: ASSAT: Computing answer sets of a logic program by SAT solvers. In: Artificial Intelligence, pp. 112–117 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ferraris, P., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: A generalization of the Lin-Zhao theorem. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 47, 79–101 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Heyting, A.: Die formalen Regeln der intuitionistischen Logik. In: Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, pp. 42–56 (1930)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferraris, P.: Answer sets for propositional theories. In: Baral, C., Greco, G., Leone, N., Terracina, G. (eds.) LPNMR 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3662, pp. 119–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Fages, F.: Consistency of Clark’s completion and existence of stable models. Methods of Logic in Computer Science 1, 51–60 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cabalar, P., Diéguez, M.: STeLP – a tool for temporal answer set programming. In: Delgrande, J., Faber, W. (eds.) LPNMR 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6645, pp. 359–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aguado, F., Cabalar, P., Pérez, G., Vidal, C. (2011). Loop Formulas for Splitable Temporal Logic Programs. In: Delgrande, J.P., Faber, W. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6645. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20894-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20895-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics