Skip to main content

Modeling the Pre Auction Stage The Truckload Case

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovations in Distribution Logistics

Summary

In transportation service procurement, shipper and carriers cost functions for serving a pair of origin-destination points, usually called lanes, are highly dependent on the opportunity to serve neighboring lanes. Traditional single-item auctions do not allow to capture this type of preferences. On the contrary, they are perfectly modeled in combinatorial auctions where bids on bundles of items are allowed. In transportation service procurement the management of a combinatorial auction can be seen as a three-stage process. Each stage involves several complex decision making problems. All such problems have relevant practical implications but only some of them have received attention in the literature. In the present paper we focus on the pre-auction stage for transportation procurement. In particular, we analyze the problem of a shipper who has to decide between undertaking and/or outsourcing (through an auction) his transportation requests. The problem has never been analyzed before.We propose two different models for the problem in the truckload case and provide their computational comparison on randomly generated instances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrache J, Crainic TG, Gendreau M (2004) Design issues for combinatorial auctions. Quarterly Journal of the Belgian, French and Italian Operations Research Societies 2(1):1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bureau Transportation Statistics (2005) Trucks carry the most freight by weight and value. Available at: http://www.bts.gov/press_releases/ 2005/bts003_05/html/bts003_05.html .

  3. Caplice C (1996), Optimization-based bidding: a new framework for shipper-carrier relationship. PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caplice C, Sheffi Y (2003) Optimization-based procurement for transportation services. Journal of Business Logistics 24(2):109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caplice C, Sheffi Y (2006) Combinatorial auctions for truckload transportation. In: Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R (eds) Combinatorial auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA:539–571.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang T-S, Crainic TG, Gendreau M (2002) Dynamic advisors for freight carriers for bidding in combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on electronic commerce research (ICECR-5), CD-ROM. Centre de Recherce sur le Transports, Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crainic TG, Speranza MG (2007) Logistics and the Internet. In: Don Taylor G (eds) Logistics engineering handbook. Taylor and Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R (2006) Combinatorial auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davenport AJ and Kalagnanam JR (2002) Price negotiations for procurement of direct inputs. In: Dietrich B, Vohra RV (eds) Mathematics of the Internet: e-auctions and markets. The IMA volumes in mathematics and its applications, Vol. 127. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York:27–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Vries S, Vohra RV (2003) Combinatorial auctions: a survey. INFORMS Journal on Computing 15(3):284–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DeMartini C, Kwasnica AM, Ledyard JO, Porter DP (2005) A new and improved design for multi-object iterative auctions. Management Science 51(3):419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dror M (2000) Arc routing: theory, solutions and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eiselt HA, Gendreau M, Laporte G (1995) Arc routing problems, part I: the chinese postman problem. Operations Research 43(2):231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eiselt HA, Gendreau M, Laporte G (1995) Arc routing problems, part II: the rural postman problem. Operations Research 43(3):399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elmaghraby W, Keskinocak P (2003) Combinatorial auctions in procurement. In: Billington C, Harrison T, Lee H, Neale J (eds) The practice of supply chain management. Kluwer Academic Publishers:245–258.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein R, Henríquez L, Catalán J, Weinstraub GY, Martínez C (2002) A combinatorial auction improves school meals in Chile. Interfaces 32(6):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ergun O, Kuyzu G, Savelsberg M (2007) Shipper collaboration. Computers & Operations Research 34(6):1551–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Figliozzi M, Mahmassani HS, Jaillet P (2002) Modeling online transportation market performance: carrier competition under asymmetric fleet assignment technology. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on electronic commerce research (ICECR-5), CD-ROM. Centre de Recherce sur le Transports, Montréal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gavish B (2003) Combinatorial auctions mathematical formulations and open issues. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 2(1):5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Golden BL, Wong RT (1981) Capacitated arc routing problems. Networks 11(3):305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jara-Diaz SR (1988) Multioutput analysis of trucking operations using spatially disaggregated flows. Transportation Research Part B 22(3):159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalagnanam J, Parkes D (2003) Auctions, bidding and exchange design. In: Simchi-Levi D, Wu SD, Shen Z-J (eds) Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: modeling in the e-business era. Kluwer Academic Publishers:143–212.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klemperer P (1999) Auction theory: a guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 13(3):227–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwon RH, Lee C-G, Ma Z (2007) A carrier's optimal bid generation problem in combinatorial auctions for transportation procurement. Transportation Research Part E 43(2):173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ledyard JO, Olson M, Porter D, Swanson JA, Torma DP (2002) The first use of a combined-value auction for transportation services. Interfaces 32(5):4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lucking-Reley D (2000) Auctions on the Internet: what's being auctioned, and how? The Journal of Industrial Economics 48(3):227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moore EW, Warmke JM, Gorban LR (1991) The indispensable role of management science in centralizing freight operations at Reynolds Metals company. Interfaces 21(1):107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nisan N (2000) Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. Minneapolis, MN:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nisan N (2006) Bidding languages for combinatorial auctions. In: Cramton P, Shoham Y, Steinberg R (eds) Combinatorial auctions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA:215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Parkes DC (2000) Optimal auction design for agents with hard valuation problems. In: Moukas A, Sierra C, Ygge F (eds) Agent mediated electronic commerce II: towards next-generation agent-based electronic commerce systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York:206–219.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pekeccaron; A and Rothkopf MH (2003) Combinatorial auction design. Management Science 49(11):1485–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Plummer C (2003) Bidder response to combinatorial auctions in truckload procurement. Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Regan A, Song J (2003) Combinatorial auctions for transportation service procurement: the carrier perspective. Transportation Research Record 1833:40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Regan A, Song J (2005) Approximation algorithms for the bid construction problem in combinatorial auctions for the procurement of freight transportation contracts. Transportation Research Part B 39(10):914–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandholm T (2002) Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence 135(1):1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sheffi Y (2004) Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transportation services. Interfaces 34(4):245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Solomon MM (1987) Algorithms for the vehicle routing and scheduling problems with time window constraints. Operations Research 35(2):254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Toth P, Vigo D (2002) The Vehicle Routing Problem. Volume 9 of SIAM Monographs on Discrete Mathematics and Applications, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gianfranco Guastaroba , Renata Mansini or M Grazia Speranza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guastaroba, G., Mansini, R., Speranza, M.G. (2009). Modeling the Pre Auction Stage The Truckload Case. In: Nunen, J., Speranza, M., Bertazzi, L. (eds) Innovations in Distribution Logistics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 619. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92944-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics