Skip to main content

Progress Appraisal as a Challenging Element of Coordination in Human and Machine Joint Activity

  • Conference paper
Engineering Societies in the Agents World VIII (ESAW 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4995))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Joint activity, as we define it, is a mutually interdependent social endeavor that requires sufficient predictability among participating parties to enable coordination. Coordination, in turn, sometimes requires the parties to appraise the state of progress of their activities so that, if necessary, they can adjust their actions to meet coordination needs and communicate their status to others as appropriate. A significant impediment as yet precluding the full participation of automation in joint activity with people is its inability to sense and communicate aspects of its state that would allow other participants to meaningfully assess progress toward (or anticipate failure with respect to) mutual objectives. In the current article, we address various issues associated with “progress appraisal” and the challenges it poses for human-machine systems. We point to promising directions for future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.F., Ferguson, G.: Human-machine collaborative planning. In: Proceedings of the NASA Planning and Scheduling Workshop, Houston, TX (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arkin, R.C.: Homeostatic control for a mobile robot: Dynamic replanning in hazardous environments. Journal of Robotic Systems 9(2), 197–214 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Biever, C.: Bots as peers: It’s all a matter of teamwork. San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco, CA, May 6 (2007) (accessed September 15, 2007), http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/06/ING9GPK9U71.DTL

  4. Biever, C.: If you’re happy, the robot knows it. The New Scientist 193(2596), 30–31 (March 24, 2007) (accessed September 15 (2007), http://technology.newscientist.com/article/mg19325966.500-if-youre-happy-the-robot-knows-it.html

  5. Bradshaw, J.M., Sierhuis, M., Acquisti, A., Feltovich, P., Hoffman, R., Jeffers, R., Prescott, D., Suri, N., Uszok, A., Van Hoof, R.: Adjustable autonomy and human-agent teamwork in practice: An interim report on space applications. In: Hexmoor, H., Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C. (eds.) Agent Autonomy, pp. 243–280. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bradshaw, J.M., Acquisti, A., Allen, J., Breedy, M.R., Bunch, L., Chambers, N., Feltovich, P., Galescu, L., Goodrich, M.A., Jeffers, R., Johnson, M., Jung, H., Lott, J., Olsen Jr., D.R., Sierhuis, M., Suri, N., Taysom, W., Tonti, G., Uszok, A.: Teamwork-centered autonomy for extended human-agent interaction in space applications. In: AAAI 2004 Spring Symposium, 22-24 March, 2004. Stanford University, CA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P., Jung, H., Kulkarni, S., Taysom, W., Uszok, A.: Dimensions of adjustable autonomy and mixed-initiative interaction. In: Nickles, M., Rovatsos, M., Weiss, G. (eds.) AUTONOMY 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2969. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P.J., Jung, H., Kulkarni, S., Allen, J., Bunch, L., Chambers, N., Galescu, L., Jeffers, R., Johnson, M., Sierhuis, M., Taysom, W., Uszok, A., Van Hoof, R.: Policy-based coordination in joint human-agent activity. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, The Hague, Netherlands, October 10-13 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bradshaw, J.M., Jung, H., Kulkarni, S., Johnson, M., Feltovich, P., Allen, J., Bunch, L., Chambers, N., Galescu, L., Jeffers, R., Suri, N., Taysom, W., Uszok, A.: Toward trustworthy adjustable autonomy in KAoS. In: Falcone, R. (ed.) Trusting Agents for Trustworthy Electronic Societies. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P., Johnson, M., Bunch, L., Breedy, M.R., Jung, H., Lott, J., Uszok, A.: Coordination in Human-Agent Teamwork. Invited Paper and Presentation. In: AAAI Fall Symposium, November 8-10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruemmer, D.J., Marble, J.L., Dudenhoeffer, D.D.: Mutual initiative in human-machine teams. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, vol. 7, pp. 22–30 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burke, J.J., Murphy, R.R., Coovert, M., Riddle, D.L.: Moonlight in Miami: A field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise. Human-Computer Interaction 19(1-2), 85–116 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Christofferson, K., Woods, D.D.: How to make automated systems team players. In: Salas, E. (ed.) Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, vol. 2. JAI Press, Elsevier (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clancey, W.J.: Situated Cognition: On Human Knowledge and Computer Representations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Clancey, W.J.: Conceptual Coordination: How the Mind Orders Experience in Time. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clancey, W.J.: Simulating activities: Relating motives, deliberation, and attentive coordination. Cognitive Systems Review (2002);Special issue on Situated and Embodied Cognition

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clancey, W.J.: Automating Capcom: Pragmatic operations and technology research for human exploration of Mars. In: Cockell, C. (ed.) Martian Expedition Planning. AAS Science and Technology Series, vol. 107, pp. 411–430 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clancey, W.J.: Roles for agent assistants in field science: Understanding personal projects and collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews 32(2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clancey, W.J., Sierhuis, M., Damer, B., Brodsky, B.: Cognitive modeling of social behavior. In: Sun, R. (ed.) Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York City (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Teamwork. SRI International, Menlo Park (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Davis, L.E., Rough, J., Ceccine, G., Gareban-Schaefer, A., Zeman, L.L.: Hurricane Katrina: Lessons for Army Planning and Operations. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feltovich, P., Bradshaw, J.M., Jeffers, R., Suri, N., Uszok, A.: Social order and adaptability in animal and human cultures as an analogue for agent communities: Toward a policy-based approach. In: Omacini, A., Petta, P., Pitt, J. (eds.) Engineering Societies for the Agents World IV. LNCS, vol. 3071, pp. 21–48. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Feltovich, P., Bradshaw, J.M., Clancey, W.J., Johnson, M.: Toward and Ontology of Regulation: Socially-based Support for Coordination in Human and Machine Joint Activity. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 175–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Fong, T.W., Thorpe, C., Baur, C.: Robot as partner: Vehicle teleoperation with collaborative control. In: Workshop on Multi-Robot Systems, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC (March 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fong, T.W., Nourbaksh, I., Ambrose, R., Simmon, R., Scholtz, J.: The peer-to-peer human-robot interaction project. In: AIAA Space 2005 (September 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Goodrich, M.A., Olsen Jr., D.R., Crandall, J.W., Palmer, T.J.: Experiments in adjustable autonomy. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI_01 Workshop on Autonomy, Delegation, and Control: Interacting with Autonomous Agents, Seattle, WA (August 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Feltovich, P., Jeffers, R., Uszok, A.: A semantically-rich policy-based approach to robot control. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation, and Robotics, Lisbon, Portugal (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, M., Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M., Bunch, L.: Human-robot coordination through dynamic regulation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Pasadena, CA (in press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson, M., Intlekofer Jr., K., Jung, H., Bradshaw, J.M., Allen, J., Suri, N., Carvalho, M.: Coordinated operations in mixed teams of humans and robots. In: Marik, V., Bradshaw, J.M., Meyer, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Distributed Human-Machine Systems (DHMS 2008), Athens, Greece (in press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kelly, G.A.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Two vols. Norton, New York (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kelly, G.A.: A Theory of Personality. W. W. Norton & Co, New York City (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  33. King, I., Mason, W.: Peace at Any Price: How the World Failed Kosovo. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Klein, G., Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M., Woods, D.D.: Common ground and coordination in joint activity. In: Rouse, W.B., Boff, K.R. (eds.) Organizational Simulation, pp. 139–184. John Wiley, New York City (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Klein, G., Woods, D.D., Bradshaw, J.M., Hoffman, R., Feltovich, P.: Ten challenges for making automation a team player in joint human-agent activity. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(6), 91–95 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Leont’ev, A.N.: The problem of activity in psychology. In: Wertsch, J.V. (ed.) The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology. M. E. Sharpe, Armonk (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Newtson, D.: Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28, 28–38 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Norman, D.A.: Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review 88, 1–15 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Norman, D.A.: The ‘problem’ with automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not ‘over-automation’. In: Broadbend, D.E., Reason, J., Baddeley, A. (eds.) Human Factors in Hazardous Situations, pp. 137–145. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Patterson, E.S., Watts-Perotti, J., Woods, D.D.: Voice loops as coordination aids in Space Shuttle Mission Control. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8, 353–371 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sarter, N., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.E.: Automation surprises. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human factors/Ergonomics, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sierhuis, M., Bradshaw, J.M., Acquisti, A., Van Hoof, R., Jeffers, R., Uszok, A.: Human-agent teamwork and adjustable autonomy in practice. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space (i-SAIRAS), Nara, Japan, May 19-23 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Smith, W.J.: The biological bases of social attunement. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 6, 361–371 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tambe, M., Shen, W., Mataric, M., Pynadath, D.V., Goldberg, D., Modi, P.J., Qiu, Z., Salemi, B.: Teamwork in cyberspace: Using TEAMCORE to make agents team-ready. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Agents in Cyberspace, Menlo Park, CA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Uszok, A., Bradshaw, J.M., Johnson, M., Jeffers, R., Tate, A., Dalton, J., Aitken, S.: KAoS policy management for semantic web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4), 32–41 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Winograd, T.: A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Human-Computer Interaction 3(1), 3–30 (1987-1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alexander Artikis Gregory M. P. O’Hare Kostas Stathis George Vouros

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Feltovich, P.J., Bradshaw, J.M., Clancey, W.J., Johnson, M., Bunch, L. (2008). Progress Appraisal as a Challenging Element of Coordination in Human and Machine Joint Activity. In: Artikis, A., O’Hare, G.M.P., Stathis, K., Vouros, G. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World VIII. ESAW 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4995. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87654-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87654-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87653-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87654-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics