Skip to main content

Transparent Complexity by Goals

  • Conference paper
Electronic Government (EGOV 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5184))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Making the teleological structure of e-government explicit can contribute to reduce its complexity. E-government can be viewed from distinct standpoints – from authorities and citizens, but also from conception and construction. This view of administrative and legal informatics requires paradigmatic changes in the effective development of e-government. We have an impression that a currently dominant normative thinking is not enough to solve specific problems of e-government. Here a new concept of legal teleology is required. We propose to supplement norms and even structural parts of a whole legal system with teleological relations. This will form a separate structural layer of legal knowledge representation. Such a layer can contribute to metadata of legal documents. This is important in the search of legal documents and information retrieval. Proposed notation A te B contains three elements: a basic element A, a target element B and a teleological relation te.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Ed. and trans. W. D. Ross. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artosi, A., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G., Vida, S.: Elements for a Formalisation of the Theory of Norms Developed in this Volume. Appendix to The Law and the Right by Pattaro, E. A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, vol. 1, pp. 413–423. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berman, D.H., Hafner, C.D.: Representing Teleological Structure in Case-based Legal Reasoning: The Missing Link. In: ICAIL 1993: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 50–59. ACM Press, New York (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Braubach, L., Pokahr, A., Moldt, D., Lamersdorf, W.: Goal representation for BDI Agent Systems. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., Seghrouchni, A.E.F. (eds.) PROMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3346, pp. 44–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costake, N.: General Requirements for Digital Government. In: Anttiroiko, A.-V., Malkia, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Digital Government, vol. 2, pp. 859–867. Idea Group, Hershey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Čaplinskas, A., Mockevičius, R.: The Role of System Engineering and Information Technologies in Legal Drafting in Lithuania. In: Šeinauskas, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the conference IT 2002, Kaunas, Lithuania, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, pp. 367–376 (2002) (in Lithuanian) ISBN 9955-09-119-3

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grönlund, Å.: Electronic Government. In: Anttiroiko, A.-V., Malkia, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Digital Government, vol. 2, pp. 634–642. Idea Group, Hershey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hart, H.L.A.: The Concept of Law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. von Jhering, R.: Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. Breitköpf und Härtel, Leipzig, pp. 1852–1865 (1924) (1st ed. 1852-1865) and also Scientia Verlag, Aalen (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. von Jhering, R.: Zweck im Recht. Breitkopf and Hartel, Wiesbaden (1970). In: Husik, I. (ed.) (trans.) Translated as Law as a Means to an End, The Boston Book Co., Boston (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufmann, A.: Analogie und “Natur der Sache”, 2nd edn. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Typus. Decker & C.F. Müller, Heidelberg (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaufmann, A., Hassemer, W., Neumann, U.: Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kelsen, H.: Reine Rechtslehre, Verlag Österreich. Also Kelsen, H. Pure Theory of Law. The University of California Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelsen, H.: Allgemeine Theorie der Normen. Manz-Verlag, Wien (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larenz, K., Canaris, C.-W.: Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, vol. 3. Aufl. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Letier, E., van Lamsweerde, A.: Reasoning about Partial Goal Satisfaction for Requirements and Design Engineering. In: Proceedings of FSE 2004, 12th ACM International Symp. on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Newport Beach (CA), pp. 53-62 (November 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luhmann, N.: Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt am Main (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  18. MacCormick, D.N., Weinberger, O.: An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism. D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Radbruch, G.: Rechtsphilosophie I, bearb. von Kaufmann, A., Heidelberg (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sartor, G.: Fundamental Legal Concepts: A Formal and Teleological Characterisation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 14(1-2), 101–142 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Summers, R.: Form and Function in a Legal System: A General Study. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tammelo, I.: Modern Logic in the Service of Law. Springer, Wien, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Traunmüller, R., Wimmer, M.: E-Government: The Challenges ahead. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3183, pp. 1–6. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Hoecke, M.: Law as Communication. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented Requirements Engineering: A Guided Tour. In: RE 2001: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE 2001), August 27-31, 2001, pp. 249–263. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Westerman, P.: Governing by Goals: Governance as a Legal Style. Legisprudence 1(1), 51–72 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wimmer, M.: Implementing a Knowledge Portal for eGovernment Based on Semantic Modeling: The e-Government Intelligent Portal (eip.at). In: Proceedings of the 39th annual HICSS conference. IEEE Computer Society (digital proceedings), Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wintgens, L.J.: Legisprudence as a New Theory of Legislation. Ratio Juris 19(1), 1–25 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Maria A. Wimmer Hans J. Scholl Enrico Ferro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Čyras, V., Lachmayer, F. (2008). Transparent Complexity by Goals. In: Wimmer, M.A., Scholl, H.J., Ferro, E. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5184. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85204-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85204-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85203-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85204-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics