Abstract
The preservation of sexual potency after prostatectomy has always been the topic of much anxiety and debate. While cancer control and urinary continence are of supreme importance, the preservation of sexual function completes the trifecta that both patient and surgeon strive to achieve. Over the decades open nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy has continued to evolve from its early rudimentary beginnings into the more refined techniques that we see at present; however, while we have seen considerable advances in recent times, the limitations in visualization and dissection of the bundle have continued to provide a challenge to even the most experienced surgeon. The introduction of robotic assistance to modern laparoscopic surgery has provided many advantages, the two greatest being improved three-dimensional magnified vision and wristed instrumentation. These technical enhancements provide the surgeon with improved surgical tools that have the potential to facilitate a more precise surgical approach. One of the potential advantages during robotic prostatectomy is improving visualization, control, and dissection of the neurovascular bundle (NVB). In this chapter we present the pertinent anatomy and the various technical approaches to nerve sparing during robotic radical prostatectomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tewari A, Peabody JO, Fischer M, Sarle R, Vallancien G, Delmas V et al. (2003) An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 43:444−454
Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473−485
Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ (2004) Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 94:1071−1076
Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, Horninger W, Peschel R, Bartsch G et al. (2006) The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 98:314−323
Strasser H, Bartsch G (2000) Anatomy and innervation of the rhabdosphincter of the male urethra. Semin Urol Oncol 18:2−8
Takenaka A, Murakami G, Matsubara A, Han SH, Fujisawa M (2005) Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 65:136−142
Ong AM, Su LM, Varkarakis L et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy sources on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. J Urol 2004 Oct; 172 (4 Pt1): 1318-22
Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky D (2005) Early potency outcomes with cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation with robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 19:715−718
Donzelli J, Leonetti JP, Wurster RD et al. (2000) Neuroprotection due to irrigation during bipolar cautery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:149−153
Korman HJ, Watson RB, Civantos F (1996) Radical prostatectomy: Is complete resection of the seminal vesicles really necessary? J Urol 156:1081–1083
John H, Hauri D (2000) Seminal vesicle-sparing radical prostatectomy: a novel concept to restore early urinary continence. Urology 55:820–824
Baccala A Jr, Reuther AM, Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, Klein EA (2007) Complete resection of seminal vesicles at radical prostatectomy results in substantial long-term disease-free survival: multi-institutional study of 6740 patients. Urology 69:536−540
Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T et al. (2004) Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:463–468
Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A et al. (2005) Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 66:1261−1265
Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A et al. (2005) Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 174:2291−2296
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology 66 (Suppl 5A):101−104
Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Chou D et al. (2005) Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology 65:994−997
Chien GW, Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA et al. (2005) Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology 66:419−423
Kursh ED, Bodner DR (1988) Alternative method of nerve sparing when performing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 32:205−209
Guillonneau B, Vallencien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643−1649
Gill IS, Ukimura O, Rubinstein M et al. (2005) Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: refined technique. Urology 65:23−27
Ukimura O, Gill IS, Desai MM et al. (2004) Real-time transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172:112−118
Maccabee MS, Trune DR, Hwang PH (2003) Effects of topically applied biomaterials on paranasal sinus mucosal healing. Am J Rhinol 17:203−207
Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Schulze M, Frede T (2003) Technical evolution of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 450 cases. J Endourol 17:143−154
Crawford ED, Bennett CL, Stone NN et al. (1997) Comparison of perspectives on prostate cancer: analysis of survey data. Urology 50:366−372
Singer PA, Tasch ES, Stocking C et al. (1991) Sex or survival: trade-offs between quality and quantity of life. J Clin Oncol 9:328−334
Helgason AR, Adolfsson J, Dickman P et al. (1998) Distress due to unwanted side effects of prostate cancer treatment is related to impaired well-being (quality of life). Prostate Cancer Prostat Dis 1:128−133
Helgason AR, Adolfsson J, Dickman P et al. (1996) Waning sexual function: the most important disease-specific distress for patients with prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 73:1417−1421
Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408−410
Penson DF, Mclerran D, Feng Z et al. (2005) 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol 173:1701−1705
Eastham J, Scardino P (2002) Radical prostatectomy. Campbell’s Urology, 4th Edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, Chapter 89. pp. 3080
Haffner MC, Landis PK, Saigal CS et al. (2005) Health-related quality-of-life outcomes after anatomic retropubic radical prostatectomy in the phosphodiesterase type 5 ERA: impact of neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology 66:371−376
Montorsi F, Guazzoni G, Strambi LF et al. (1997) Recovery of spontaneous erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with and without early intracavernous injections of alprostadil: results of a prospective, randomized trial. J Urol 158:1408−1410
Brock G, Tu LM, Linet OL (2001) Return of spontaneous erection during long-term intracavernosal alprostadil (Caverject) treatment. Urology 57:536−541
Montorsi F, Maga T, Strambi LF et al. (2000) Sildenafil taken at bedtime significantly increases nocturnal erections: results of a placebo-controlled study. Urology 56:906−911
Guillonneau B, Cathelineau X, Vallencien G et al. (2002) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 550 procedures. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 43:123
Su L, Link R, Bhayani S et al. (2004) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique: Urology 64:123−127
Turk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B et al. (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur Urol 40:46−52
Rassweiler J, Stolzenburg J, Sulser T (2006) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 49:113–119
Katz R, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. (2002) Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 168:2078−2082
Palmer KT, Shah K, Patel VR et al. Early Retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during robotic assisted laparoscopic radial prostatectomy. Urology 70. (Supplement 3A), 172, September 2007
Palmer KT, Coughlin G, Patel VR et al. Motivating influences for patients seeking consultation for Robotic prostatectomy. Urology 70 (Supplement 3A), 94, September 2007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shah, K., Chammas, M., Palmer, K., Thaly, R., Patel, V. (2008). Nerve-sparing Techniques for Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. In: John, H., Wiklund, P. (eds) Robotic Urology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74140-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74139-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74140-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)