Summary
The chapter describes a teleoperation system for assisting disabled and elderly people in their lives and work environments. The developed system ASIBOT (assistive robot) is part of the EU 5th FP project MATS (IST 2001-32080). The goal of the project is to come up with a new concept in teleoperated robotics systems that would help people in their daily domestic activities such as eating, drinking, shaving, grooming or simply retrieving objects from shelves or from the floor, etc. The best feature of the ASIBOT system is represented by a snake-like robot arm that is capable of moving around serially from a wall-mounted or table- mounted docking stations. The robot is also able to “jump” to or from a wheelchair. One of the important properties of proprio and teleoperation of assistive robots is the fact that the operator could be at the same time the patient, the user or the target of the task. Due to disability, the operator has limited capability on controlling the master and also considerable delays in closing the teleoperation loop. Depending on the level of the operators disability, different types of HMI are needed to be used. Some HMI are commanded by voice, simple switches or a joystick.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Buss and G. Schmidt. Multi-modal telepresence. In Advances in control, Hightlights of the 5th European Control Conference ECC’, 1999.
T.B. Sherindan. Telerobotics and Human Supervisory Control. The MIT Press, 1992.
P. Arcara and C. Melchori. Control Schemes for Teleoperation with Time Delay: A Comparative Study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 38, 2002.
C. E. Garcia, R. Carelli, J. F. Postigo, and B. Morales. Time Delay Compensation Control Structure for a Robotic Teleoperation system. In Proceeding 4th IFAC International Symposium on Intelligent Components and Instruments for Control Applications., 2000.
P. Arcara and C. Melchori. Control Schemes for Teleoperation with Time Delay: A Comparative Study. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Vol. 38, 2002.
D. McRuer. Human Dynamics in Man-Machine Systems Automatica, Vol. 16, 1980.
W. Harwin and T. Rahman. Safe software in rehabilitation mechatronic and robotics design In RESNA 15th Annual Conference, pages 100–102, 1992.
H.F.M. Van Der Loos, D.S. Lees, and L.J. Leifer. Safety considerations for rehabilitative and human service robot systems In RESNA 15th Annual Conference, pages 322–324, 1992.
A. Gimnez, A. Jardn, R. Correal, R. Cabas, and C. Balaguer. A portable light-weight climbing robot for personal assistance applications In 8th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots (Clawar’05) 2005.
C. Balaguer, A. Giménez, and A. Jardón. Climbing Robots Mobility for Inspection and Maintenance of 3D complex Environments. Autonomous Robots, Vol. 18. No. 3. pages 157–169.
R. Rammoun, J.M. Dtrich, and F. Lauture. The new MASTER man-machine interface In International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 1994.
Z. Han, H. Jiang, P. Scucces, S. Robidoux, and Y. Sun. PowerScan: a Single-Switch Environmental Control System for Persons with Disabilities In Proceedings of the IEEE Bioengineering Conference 8–9th, pages 171–172.
M.J. Topping, H. Helmut, and G. Bolsmjo. An Overview Of the BIOMED 2 RAIL Robotic Aid to Independent Living Project. In International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics ICORR’97, pages 23–26. Vol. 37 No. 5, pages 591–598, 1997.
A. Craig, Y. Tran, P. McIsaac, and P. Boord. The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled. Med Sci Monit 11(1): RA32–39, PMID: 15614204, 2004.
J. Angelo. Factors affecting the use of a single switch with assistive technology devices, Journal or Rehabilitation. Research and development, Vol. 37 No. 5, pages 591–598, 2000.
S.K. Card, T.P. Moran, and A. Newell. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.
S. Keates, P.J. Clarkson, and P. Robinson. Investigating the applicability of user models for motion-impaired users In Proceedings of ACM ASSETS 2000, Arlington, VA. pages 129–136, 2000.
C. Balaguer, A. Giménez, A. Jardón, R. Cabas, and R. Correal. Live experimentation of the service robot applications elderly people care in home environments In IEEE/RSJ. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’2005)
A.M. Sabatini, V. Genovese, and E.S. Maini. Be-Viewer: vision-based navigation system to assist motor-impaired people in docking their mobility aids In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2003), pages 1318–1323.
D. McRuer and E.S. Krendel. Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior. ARGARDAG-188, 1974.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balaguer, C. et al. (2007). Proprio and Teleoperation of a Robotic System for Disabled Persons’ Assistance in Domestic Environments. In: Ferre, M., Buss, M., Aracil, R., Melchiorri, C., Balaguer, C. (eds) Advances in Telerobotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 31. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71364-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71364-7_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71363-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71364-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)