Skip to main content

Investigating Visuo-tactile Recognition of Unfamiliar Moving Objects

  • Conference paper
Book cover Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios (EuroHaptics 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5024))

Abstract

Previous research on haptic object recognition has focused mainly on static objects and very little is understood about the role of dynamic information in haptic object recognition. In this study we examined if motion, particularly dynamic object parts, is combined with shape information in the representation of an object in haptic memory. In our behavioural studies we found that target objects previously learned as moving objects were more easily recognized when presented dynamically than when presented as static objects, even though, shape information alone was sufficient to recognize each object. Moreover, cross-modal, visuo-tactile object recognition was better for dynamic than static objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Stone, J.V.: Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research 38, 947–951 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stone, J.V.: Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research 39, 4032–4044 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Newell, F.N., Wallraven, C., Huber, S.: The role of characteristic motion in object categorization. Journal of Vision 4, 118–129 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Milner, D.A., Goodale, M.A.: The visual brain in action, vol. xvii. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goodale, M.A., Milner, D.A.: Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 15, 20–25 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodale, M.A., Milner, D.A., Jakobson, L.S., Carey, D.P.: A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature 349, 154–156 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kourtzi, Z., Bülthoff, H.H., Erb, M., Grodd, W.: Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST. Nature Neuroscience 5, 17–18 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kourtzi, Z., Kanwisher, N.: Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293, 1506–1509 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kourtzi, Z., Kanwisher, N.: Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex. Science 293, 1506–1509 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan, J.S., Newell, F.N.: Behavioural evidence for task-dependent, ‘what’ versus ‘where’ processing within and across modalities. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 36–49 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Braddick, O.J., O’Brien, J.M.D., Wattam-Bell, J., Atkinson, J., Turner, R.: Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain. Current Biology 10, 731–734 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Macmillan, N.A., Creelman, C.D.: Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Snodgrass, J.G., Corwin, J.: Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117, 34–50 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Newell, F.N., Ernst, M.O., Tjan, B.S., Bülthoff, H.H.: Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition. Psychological Science 12, 37–42 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zeki, S.: A vision of the brain. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zeki, S., Watson, J.D., Lueck, C.J., Friston, K.J., Kennard, C., Frackowiak, R.S.: A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 11, 641–649 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Poirer, C., Collignon, O., DeVolder, A.G., Renier, L., Venlierde, A., Tranduy, D., Scheiber, C.: Specific activation of the V5 brain area by auditory motion processing: An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research 25, 650–658 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hagen, M., Franzén, O., McGlone, F., Essick, G., Dancer, C., Pardo, J.V.: Tactile motion activates the human middle temporal/V5 (MT/V5) complex. European Journal of Neuroscience 16, 957–964 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kourtzi, Z., Kanwisher, N.: Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 48–55 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Manuel Ferre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chan, J.S., Whitaker, T.A., Newell, F.N. (2008). Investigating Visuo-tactile Recognition of Unfamiliar Moving Objects. In: Ferre, M. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices and Scenarios. EuroHaptics 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5024. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69057-3_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69056-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69057-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics