Abstract
CBSD needs to customize and compose components. Customization and composition can cause faults which are hard to detect by existing testing techniques, since components have different structures from traditional programs. This paper proposes a testing technique for customization and composition, and then it tailors the technique to COM component architecture. Since CBSD aims to reduce development cost, testing should consider the cost of testing. Effective test data will help reduce testing cost. Therefore, an empirical study shows that the technique proposed in this paper selects effective test data.
This work was partially supported by grant No.R04-2003-000-10139-0 from the Basic Research Program of the Korea Science & Engineering Foundation. This work was partially supported by University IT Research Center Project.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Harrold, M.J.: Testing: A Roadmap. In: Proceeding of the Future of Software Engineering of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (June 2000)
Harrold, M.J., Liang, D., Sinha, S.: An Approach to Analyzing and Testing Component-Based Systems. In: Proceeding of the First International ICSE Workshop on Testing Distributed Component-Based Systems, Los Angeles, CA (May 1999)
Allen, P.: Practical Strageties for Migration to CBD. IT Journal Distributed Component Systems (1999)
D’Souza, D.F., Wills, A.C.: Object, Components, and Frameworks with UML. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)
Jezequl, J.M., Sussman, D.: Design by Contract: The Lessons of Ariane. Computer, 129–130 (January 1997)
Yoon, H., Choi, B.: Effective Test Case Selection for Component Customization and Its Application to EJB. The Software Testing, Verification, and Reliability Journal 14(2) (June 2004) (to appear)
Yoon, H., Choi, B.: Component Customization Testing Technique Using Fault Injection Technique and Mutation Test Criteria. In: Proceeding of Mutation 2000, San Jose, USA, October 2000, pp. 71–78 (2000)
DeMillo, R.A., Lipton, R.J., Sayward, F.G.: Hints on Test Data Selection: Help for the Practicing Programmer. IEEE Computer 11(4), 34–41 (1978)
Eric Wong, W., Horgan, J.R., Mathur, A.P., Pasquini, A.: Test Set Size Minimization and Fault Detection Effectiveness: A Case Study in a Space Application. In: Proceeding of COMPSAC 1997, Washington D.C., USA, pp. 522–529 (1997)
Mathur, A.P., Eric Wong, W.: Comparing the Fault Detection Effectiveness of Mutation and Data Flow Testing: An Empirical Study. SERC-TR-146-P, Purdue University (1993)
Delamaro, M.E., Maldonado, J.C., Mathur, A.P.: Interface Mutation: An Approach for Integration Testing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27(3), 228–247 (2001)
Ghosh, S.: Testing Component-Based Distributed Applications. Ph. D Dissertation, Department of Computer Science in Purdue University (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yoon, H., Kim, E., Seo, J.Y., Choi, B. (2005). Testing COM Components Using Software Fault Injection and Mutation Analysis, and Its Empirical Study. In: Grabowski, J., Nielsen, B. (eds) Formal Approaches to Software Testing. FATES 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3395. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31848-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31848-4_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-25109-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31848-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)