Definition
Increasing life expectancy and low birth rates globally contribute to the elderly constituting an ever growing share of the population. Though the category of “the elderly” is generally determined by age, there is no common definition. In this entry, we focus on social groups that normally find themselves in the postoccupational phase. The elderly surely make their greatest contribution to society within the family by, for example, looking after their relatives. This entry, however, deals with the civic engagement of the elderly outside their families: activities in more formal organizations, networks, and initiatives of civil society. Such engagement tends to have a positive impact on the elderly participants and on civil society more broadly. The entry also reflects on civil society initiatives that attract the elderly as members, offer them services, and promote their interests. The civil engagement of people 65+ is growing worldwide, but their participation rates vary...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Age UK. (2018/2019). Helping more of the older people who need us the most: Report of trustees and annual accounts 2018/2019. London: Age UK.
Ajrouch, K. J., Antonucci, T., & Webster, J. N. (2016). Volunteerism. Social network dynamics and education. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(2), 309–319.
Anheier, H. K., & Salamon, L. M. (1999). Volunteering in cross-national perspective: Initial comparisons. Law and Contemporary Problems, 62, 43–65.
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. B. Baltes & M. M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. (1999). Multilevel and systemic analyses of old age: Theoretical and empirical evidence for a fourth age. In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 153–173). New York: Springer.
Brauer, K. (2008). Ageism in aging societies: Ein “natürliches” problem? In K. S. Rehberg (Ed.), Die Natur der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016). Volunteering in the United States – 2015. Table 2 [press release]. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Burgess, E. W. (Ed.). (1960). Aging in Western societies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9, 243–246.
Butler, R. N., & Gleason, H. P. (Eds.). (1985). Productive aging: Enhancing vitality in later life. New York: Springer.
Bytheway, B. (2005). Ageism and age categorization. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 361–374.
Caro, F. G., & Bass, S. A. (1995). Dimensions of productive engagement. In S. A. Bass (Ed.), Older and active (pp. 204–216). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Chambre, S. (1993). Volunteerism by elders. Past trends and future prospects. The Gerontologist, 33, 221–228.
Cumming, E., & Henry, W. E. (1961). Growing old: The process of disengagement. New York: Basic Books.
Dewey, M. E., & Prince, M. J. (2005). Mental health. In Health, ageing and retirement in Europe – First results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (pp. 108–117). Mannheim: Research Institute for the Economics of Aging (MEA).
Dorfman, L. T., & Kolarik, D. C. (2005). Leisure and the retired professor: Occupation matters. Educational Gerontology, 31(5), 343–361.
Erlinghagen, M., & Hank, K. (2006). The participation of older Europeans in volunteer work. Aging & Society, 27, 567–584.
Fried, L. P., Carlson, M. C., Freedman, M., Frick, K. D., Glass, T. A., Hill, J., McGill, S., Rebok, G. W., Seeman, T., Tielsch, J., Wasik, B. A., & Zeger, S. (2004). A social model for health promotion for an aging population: Initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. Journal of Urban Health, 81(1), 64–78.
Harootyan, R. A., & Vorek, R. E. (1994). Volunteering, helping and gift giving in families and communities. In V. L. Bengtson & R. A. Harootyan (Eds.), Intergenerational linkages: Hidden connections in American society. New York: Springer.
Haski-Leventhal, D. (2009). Elderly volunteering and well-being. A cross-European comparison based on SHARE data. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 20, 388–404.
Ichida, Y., Hirai, H., Kondo, K., Kawachi, I., Takeda, T., & Endo, H. (2013). Does social participation improve self-rated health in the older population? A quasi-experimental intervention study. Social Science & Medicine, 94, 83–90.
Kocka, J. (2007). Chancen alternder Gesellschaften. Merkur. Deutsche Zeitschrift für europäisches Denken, 61, 357–361.
Kohli, M. (2007). The institutionalization of the life course: Looking back to look ahead. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 253–271.
Kohli, M., & Künemund, H. (2002). La fin de carrière et la transition vers la retraite – Les limites d’âge chronologiques sont-elles un anachronisme? Retraite et Société, 36, 81–107.
Komp, K., Kersbergen, K. V., & Tilburg, T. V. (2013). Policies for older volunteers. A study of Germany and Italy 1990–2008. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(4), 443–455.
Künemund, H., & Rein, M. (1999). There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19, 93–121.
Künemund, H., & Vogel, C. (2018). Altersgrenzen. Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde zur Beendigung von Erwerbsarbeit und Ehrenamt. In S. Scherger & C. Vogel (Eds.), Arbeit im Alter (pp. 75–97). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Lancee, B., & Radl, J. (2014). Volunteering over the life course. Social Forces, 93(2), 833–862.
Leisering, L., & Leibfried, S. (1999). Time and poverty in Western welfare states. United Germany in perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martinson, M., & Minkler, M. (2006). Civic engagement and older adults: A critical perspective. The Gerontologist, 46, 318–324.
Molina, A. M., Cañadas-Reche, J. L., & Serrano-del-Rosal, R. (2018). Social participation of the elders in Europe: The influence of individual and contextual variables. Ageing International, 43, 190–206.
Moody, H. R. (2001). Productive aging and the ideology of old age. In N. Morrow-Howell et al. (Eds.), Productive aging: Concepts and challenges. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Neugarten, B. L. (Ed.). (1982). Age or need? Public policies for older people. Beverly Hills: Sage.
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019a). OECD employment outlook 2019: The future of work. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019b). OECD labour force statistics 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Scherger, S., Brauer, K., & Künemund, H. (2004). Partizipation und Engagement älterer Menschen im Stadt-Land-Vergleich. In G. Backes et al. (Eds.), Lebensformen und Lebensführung im Alter (pp. 173–193). Opladen: VS.
Schweda, M., Pfaller, L., Brauer, K., Adloff, F., & Schicktanz, S. (Eds.). (2019). Planning later life: Bio-ethics and public health in aging societies. London/New York: Routledge.
Simonson, J., Vogel, C., & Tesch-Römer, C. (2017). Volunteering in Germany. Key findings of the Fourth German Survey on Volunteering. Berlin: BMFSFJ.
Smith, D. B. (2004). Volunteering in retirement: Perceptions of midlife workers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 55–73.
Staudinger, U. (2015). Images of aging: Outside and inside perspectives. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 35(1), 187–210.
StBA – Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. (2006). 11. Koordinierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung – Annahmen und Ergebnisse. Wiesbaden: StBA.
StBA – Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland. (2019). Bevölkerung Deutschlands bis 2060. Ergebnisse der 14. koordinierten Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung – Hauptvarianten 1 bis 9. Wiesbaden: StBA.
Tang, F. (2008). Socioeconomic disparities in voluntary organization involvement among older adults. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 57–75.
UN – Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2019). World population prospects, volume I: Comprehensive tables. New York: United Nations.
Vogel, C., & Gordo, L. R. (2019). Ehrenamtliches Engagement von Frauen und Männern im Verlauf der zweiten Lebenshälfte. In C. Vogel, M. Wettstein, & C. Tesch-Römer (Eds.), Frauen und Männer in der zweiten Lebenshälfte (pp. 113–132). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Vogel, C., Hagen, C., Simonson, J., & Tesch-Römer, C. (2017). Freiwilliges Engagement und öffentliche gemeinschaftliche Aktivität. In J. Simonson, C. Vogel, & C. Tesch-Römer (Eds.), Freiwilliges Engagement in Deutschland. Der Deutsche Freiwilligensurvey 2014 (pp. 91–150). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Wahrendorf, M., Siegrist, J., & von dem Knesebeck, O. (2006). Social productivity and well-being of older people – Baseline results from the SHARE study. European Journal of Ageing, 3, 67–73.
Wang, M., Henkens, K., & van Solinge, H. (2011). Retirement adjustment: A review of theoretical and empirical advancements. American Psychologist, 66(3), 204–213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Brauer, K., Kocka, J. (2020). Civil Society and the Elderly. In: List, R., Anheier, H., Toepler, S. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_85-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_85-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences