Skip to main content

Publicising Privacy, Weaponising Publicity: The Dialectic of Online Abuse on Social Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change ((PSCSC))

Abstract

Salter uses dialectical theory to examine the contradictions between online ‘publics’ and privacy. The chapter argues that online abuse and harassment are products of the evident tension between the encouragement of online intimacy by social media platforms on one hand, and the commodification and exploitation of user data on the other. In patterns of online abuse and harassment, private life becomes ‘public’ in unwanted ways via technology that is designed for instantaneous circulation and exposure. A dialectic analysis suggests that the availability of social media for misogynist abuse is no coincidence, and demonstrates how technology reproduces social and material inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adorno, T.W. (2017). An Introduction to Dialectics. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, J. (2011). Digital Divides and Social Network Sites: Which Students Participate in Social Media? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45: 147–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1990). Fatal Strategies. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd, d.m., and Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13: 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope. Cambridge and Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, L. (2003). Gender and the “Great Divide”: Public and Private in British Gender History. Journal of Women’s History, 15: 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and Circuits of Struggle in High-Technology Capitalism. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. (2018). Speaking to the Other: Digital Intimate Publics and Gamergate …

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25/26: 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London and New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2007). Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehl, R.W. (2012). Real (Software) Abstractions on the Rise of Facebook and the Fall of MySpace. Social Text, 30: 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2015). Platforms Intervene. Social Media + Society, 1: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S.C. (1999). The Rhetorical Dynamics of Gender Harassment On-Line. The Information Society, 15: 151–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jane, E.A. (2016). Misogyny Online: A Short (and Brutish) History. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, L. (2002). Hanging Out in the Virtual Pub: Masculinities and Relationships Online. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A.E. (2008). To Catch a Predator? The MySpace Moral Panic. First Monday, 13. http://firstmonday.org/article/view/2152/1966.

  • Mason, P. (2013). Why It’s Still Kicking Off Everywhere: The New Global Revolutions. London and New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massanari, A. (2017). #Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit’s Algorithm, Governance, and Culture Support Toxic Technocultures. New Media & Society, 19: 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. (2004). The Public Sphere: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, A. (2017). Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4Chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Alresford, UK: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, L. (2012). ‘Blokey’ Newsrooms Still a Battleground for Female Journalists. Australian Journalism Review, 34: 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi, Z. (2014). On Networked Publics and Private Spheres in Social Media. In J. Hunsinger and T. Senft (eds.), The Social Media Handbook. London and New York: Routledge, 144–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988). The Sexual Contract. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W. (2015). This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship Between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2013). Justice and Revenge in Online Counter-Publics: Emerging Responses to Sexual Violence in the Age of Social Media. Crime, Media, Culture, 9: 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2016). Privates in the Online Public: Sex(ting) and Reputation on Social Media. New Media & Society, 18: 2723–2739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2017). Crime, Justice and Social Media. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2018). From Geek Masculinity to Gamergate: The Technological Rationality of Online Abuse. Crime, Media, Culture, 14: 247–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M., and Crofts, T. (2015). Responding to Revenge Porn: Challenges to Online Legal Impunity. In L. Comella and L. Tarrant (eds.), New Views on Pornography: Sexuality, Politics and the Law. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D.J. (2007). The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavani, H.T. (2008). Informational Privacy: Concepts, Theories, and Controversies. In K.E. Himmer and H.T. Tavani (eds.), The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 131–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (1989). The Geography of Women’s Fear. Area, 21: 385–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Salter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salter, M. (2018). Publicising Privacy, Weaponising Publicity: The Dialectic of Online Abuse on Social Media. In: Dobson, A.S., Robards, B., Carah, N. (eds) Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97607-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics