Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media pp 3–27Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media: Towards Theorising Public Lives on Private Platforms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change ((PSCSC))

Abstract

Dobson, Carah and Robards theorise digital intimate publics as spaces of power contestation where the public and private intermingle. They draw on queer and feminist theory to examine the generative political potential of ‘oversharing’, ‘excesses’, and ‘unpredictable intimacies’ on social media. They then cogently chart conceptualisations of digital intimacy as both social capital and labour, arguing for the need for digital cultures scholarship to hold these perspectives together. The ability to attract attention by being intimate online can be converted into other kinds of capital. The doing of intimacy online also doubles as labour in the sense that it produces valuable attention and data. The political challenge, they suggest, is to imagine and cultivate public intimacies where both the relations and performative practices and their infrastructure are publicly held.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t These Just Young, Rich Women Doing Vain Things Online?”: Influencer Selfies as Subversive Frivolity. Social Media + Society, 2(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abidin, C. (2018). lnternet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albury, K. (2015). Selfies, Sexts and Sneaky Hats: Young People’s Understandings of Gendered Practices of Self-Representation. International Journal of Communication, 9(12), 1734–1745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albury, K. (2017). Just Because It’s Public Doesn’t Mean It’s Any of Your Business: Adults’ and Children’s Sexual Rights in Digitally Mediated Spaces. New Media & Society, 19(5), 713–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, R. (2017). New Kinships, New Family Formations and Negotiations of Intimacy Via Social Media Sites. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, M. (2007). iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era (p. 182). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, M. (2011). Surveillance and Alienation in the Online Economy. Surveillance & Society, 8(3), 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athique, A. (2017). The Dynamics and Potentials of Big Data for Audience Research. Media, Culture & Society, 40(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717693681.

  • Attwood, F. (2006). Sexed Up: Theorizing the Sexualization of Culture. Sexualities, 9(1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banet-Weiser, S. (2012). AuthenticTM: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (1998). Intimacy: A Special Issue. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2008). The Female Complaint. Durham and London: Duke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in Public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, R., & Kavka, M. (2018). Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, Self-Exposure and the Productivity of Negative Affect. Convergence, 24(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollmer, G. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T. (2012). Want to Be on the Top? Algorithmic Power and the Threat of Invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T. (2017). The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2016.1154086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carah, N. (2014). Curators of Databases: Circulating Images, Managing Attention and Making Value on Social Media. Media International Australia, 150(February), 137–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carah, N., & Angus, D. (2018). Algorithmic Brand Culture: Participatory Labour, Machine Learning and Branding on Social Media. Media, Culture & Society, 40(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718754648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carah, N., & Dobson, A. (2016). Algorithmic Hotness: Young Women’s “Promotion” and “Reconnaissance” Work Via Social Media Body Images. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carah, N., & Shaul, M. (2016). Brands and Instagram: Point, Tap, Swipe, Glance. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cefai, S., & Couldry, N. (2017). Mediating the Presence of Others: Reconceptualising Co-presence as Mediated Intimacy. European Journal of Cultural Studies, efirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417743040.

  • Chambers, D. (2013). Social Media and Personal Relationships. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A. (2014). The Labourers Who Keep Dick Pics and Beheadings Out of Your Facebook Feed. Wired Magazine, 10.23.14. Available at: https://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/.

  • Clough, P. T. (2009). The New Empiricism: Affect and Sociological Method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cover, R. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2010). Blog Theory: Feedback and Capture in the Circuits of Drive. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. S. (2015). Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. S. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A., & Coffey, J. (2015). A Feminist Response to Moral Panic Around Girls’ ‘Boner Garage’ Instagram Selfies. Retrieved from https://tasayouth.wordpress.com/.

  • Dobson, A. S., & Ringrose, J. (2016). Sext Education: Pedagogies of Sex, Gender and Shame in the Schoolyards of Tagged and Exposed. Sex Education, 16(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1050486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowsett, G. (2015). The Price of Pulchritude, the Cost of Concupiscence: How to Have Sex in Late Modernity. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). “Having It All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duguay, S. (2014). “He Has a Way Gayer Facebook Than I Do”: Investigating Sexual Identity Disclosure and Context Collapse on a Social Networking Site. New Media & Society, 18(6), 891–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. Social Text, 25(26), 56–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for You: The Netflix Prize and the Production of Algorithmic Culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L., & Ringrose, J. (2015). Sexting, Ratings and (Mis)Recognition: Teen Boys Performing Classed and Racialized Masculinities in Digitally Networked Publics. In E. Renold, J. Ringrose, & R. D. Egan (Eds.), Children, Sexuality and Sexualisation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, A. (2008). Meat, Mask, Burden: Probing the Contours of the Brandedself. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, N. (2014). Selfies Pedagogy (Blogpost). Accessed November 2015. Available at: http://www.nataliehendry.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Hendry-Selfies-pedagogy-CCP-panel-15-Oct-14.pdf.

  • Hobbs, M., Owen, S., & Gerber, L. (2016). Liquid Love? Dating Apps, Sex, Relationships and the Digital Transformation of Intimacy. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 271–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth, L., & Arnold, M. (2013). Online@AsiaPacific: Mobile, Social and Locative Media in the Asia-Pacific. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, S., & Ryan, N. (2014). Digital Narratives, Social Connectivity and Disadvantaged Youth: Raising Aspirations for Rural and Low Socioeconomic Young People. International Studies in Widening Participation, 1(1), 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a Concept: Explaining Social Change in the Context of Globalisation or Another Form of Ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L. (2013). Personal Relationships, Intimacy and the Self in a Mediated and Global Digital Age. In K. Orton-Johnson & N. Prior (Eds.), Digital Sociology: Critical Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, K. (2014). The Relevance of “Women’s Work” Social Reproduction and Immaterial Labor in Digital Media. Television & New Media, 15(1), 14–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, K. (2016). Feminism, Labour, and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanai, A. (in press). Gender and Relatability in Digital Culture: Managing Affect, Intimacy and Value. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofoed, J., & Larsen, M. (2016). A Snap of Intimacy: Photo-Sharing Practices Among Young People on Social Media. First Monday, 21(11). http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905.

  • Lambert, A. (2016). Intimacy and Social Capital on Facebook: Beyond the Psychological Perspective. New Media & Society, 18(1), 2559–2575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasen, A., & Hjorth, L. (2017). Inscribing Intimacy: Conceptual Frames for Understanding Mobile Media Affect. In A. S. Tellería (Ed.), Between the Public and Private in Mobile Communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (2013). Status Update. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (2015). Instafame: Luxury Selfies in the Attention Economy. Public Culture, 27(1 (75)), 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matias, N. (2016). The Civic Labor of Online Moderators. Oxford Internet Politics & Policy Conference, September 23. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0a11/fb93ada453ec27c7fec63e69508e7e6201cd.pd.

  • McGlotten, S. (2013). Virtual Intimacies: Media, Affect and Queer Sociality. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, M. (2013). Young People and Pornography: Negotiating Pornification. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitcan, M., Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2018). Performing a Vanilla Self: Respectability Politics, Social Class, and the Digital World. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy008.

  • Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate Citizenship: Private Decision and Public Dialogues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preciado, P. B. (2014). Pornotopia: An Essay on Playboy’s Architecture and Biopolitics. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, K. (2015). Speculative Pragmatism and Intimate Arrangements: Online Hook-Up Devices in Gay Life. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.930181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raun, T. (2018). Capitalizing Intimacy: New Subcultural Forms of Micro-celebrity Strategies and Affective Labour on YouTube. Convergence, 24(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517736983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen Girls, Sexual Double Standards and ‘Sexting’: Gendered Value in Digital Image Exchange. Feminist Theory, 14(3), 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robards, B. (2014) Digital Traces of the Persona Through Ten Years of Facebook. M/C Journal, 17(3). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/818.

  • Robards, B., & Lincoln, S. (2016) Making It ‘Facebook Official’: Reflecting on Romantic Relationships Through Sustained Facebook Use. Social Media + Society, Oct–Dec, 1–10. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2056305116672890.

  • Robards, B. & Lincoln, S. (2017) Uncovering Longitudinal Life Narratives: Scrolling Back on Facebook. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 715–730. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1468794117700707.

  • Rubin, J. D., & McClelland, S. I. (2015). ‘Even Though It’s a Small Checkbox, It’s a Big Deal’: Stresses and Strains of Managing Sexual Identity(s) on Facebook. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 512–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft, T. M. (2008). Camgirls: Celebrity & Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senft, T. M. (2012). Hating Habermas: On Exhibitionism, Shame & Life on the Actually Existing Internet. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7989480/Hating_Habermas_On_Exhibitionism_Shame_and_Life_on_the_Actually_Existing_Internet.

  • Skeggs, B. (2014). Values Beyond Value? Is Anything Beyond the Logic of Capital? The British Journal of Sociology, 65(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2012). Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terranova, T. (2000) Free Labor: Producing Culture for a Digital Economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, M. (2018). This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivienne, S. (2016). Digital Identity and Everyday Activism: Sharing Private Stories with Networked Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counter Publics. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, K. (2007). Life Within and Against Work: Affective Labor, Feminist Critique, and Post-fordist Politics. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 7(1), 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissinger, E. (2007). Modelling a Way of Life: Immaterial and Affective Labour in the Fashion Modelling Industry. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organization, 7(1), 250–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, D., Bonsu, S. K., & Darmody, A. (2008). Putting Consumers to Work: Co-creation and New Marketing Govern-Mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 163–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Amy Shields Dobson

  2. University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Nicholas Carah

  3. Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Brady Robards

Authors
  1. Amy Shields Dobson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas Carah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brady Robards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Shields Dobson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia

    Amy Shields Dobson

  2. Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Brady Robards

  3. School of Communication and Arts, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

    Nicholas Carah

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dobson, A.S., Carah, N., Robards, B. (2018). Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media: Towards Theorising Public Lives on Private Platforms. In: Dobson, A.S., Robards, B., Carah, N. (eds) Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97607-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation