Skip to main content

An Eye-Tracking Study on Usability and Efficiency of Blackboard Platform

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design for Inclusion (AHFE 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 776))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Learning management platforms are widely used in the courses in different levels. The goal of this research is to investigate the usability of the Blackboard platform a popular learning management platform. We use an eye-tracking method to investigate the usability of the platform. The analysis provided information about the points where students had difficulty interacting. The results of this experiment are intended to be used for designing a visual user interface for the instructors and students to improve the usability and user-friendliness of the learning platforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu, H.: An analysis on blended learning pattern based on blackboard network platform. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 11, 4–8 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martín-Blas, T., Serrano-Fernández, A.: The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in physics. Comput. Educ. 52, 35–44 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Xiomara, L., Pulido, V., Villamil, N.O., Tarazona, G.: Knowledge management in organizations 731, 107–118 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garrison, D.R.: Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: the role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. In: Bourne, J., Moore, J.C. (eds.) Elem. Qual. Pract. Dir. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nielsen, J.: Usability 101: Introduction to Usability Why Usability is Important How to Improve Usability. Focus (Madison), pp. 1–4 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen, J.: Anonymous: Usability Engineering (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Barr, V., Guzdial, M.: Advice on teaching CS, and the learnability of programming languages. Commun. ACM 58, 8–9 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kissinger, J.S.: The social and mobile learning experiences of students using mobile E-books. J. Asynchron. Learn. Netw. 17, 155–170 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Domik, G., Gershon, N.D., Modeling, N., Hutchison, D.: Building Bridges: HCI, Visualization, and Non-formal Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldberg, J.H., Wichansky, A.M.: Eye tracking in usability evaluation: a practitioner’s guide. In: Mind’s Eyes Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duchowski, A.: Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Springer, London (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahneman, D., Beatty, J.: Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science 154, 1583–1585 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fukuda, K., Stern, J., Brown, T., Russo, M.: Cognition, blinks, eye-movements, and pupillary movements during performance of a running memory task. Aviat. Sp. Environ. Med. 76, 75–85 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Recarte, M.A., Pérez, E., Conchillo, A., Nunes, L.M.: Mental workload and visual impairment: differences between pupil, blink, and subjective rating. Span. J. Psychol. 11, 374–385 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van Gerven, P.W.M., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Schmidt, H.G.: Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology 41, 167–174 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Partala, T., Surakka, V.: Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 185–198 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rakoczi, G.: Look here! Are there gender differences in learners’ eye movements while using an e-learning platform? In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Games-Based Learning, pp. 453–460 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cantoni, V., Perez, C.J., Porta, M., Ricotti, S.: Exploiting eye tracking in advanced e-learning systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies – CompSysTech 2012, p. 376 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt, H., Wassermann, B., Zimmermann, G.: An adaptive and adaptable learning platform with real-time eye-tracking support: lessons learned. In: Tagungsband DeLFI 2014, pp. 241–252 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lidwell, W., Holden, K., Butler, J.: Universal Principles of Design. 25 Ways to Enhance Usability Influence Perception Increase Appeal Make Better Design Decisions and Teach through Design, pp. 1–271 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sutcliffe, A., Ryan, M., Doubleday, A., Springett, M.: Model mismatch analysis: towards a deeper explanation of users’ usability problems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 19, 43–55 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ballard, J.K.: Web site usability: a case study of student perceptions of educational web sites (2010). http://210.48.222.80/proxy.pac/docview/597211428?accountid=44024

  23. Nielsen, J., Pernice, K.: Eyetracking Web Usability. New Riders, Berkeley (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Majooni, A., Masood, M., Akhavan, A.: An eye tracking experiment on strategies to minimize the redundancy and split attention effects in scientific graphs and diagrams. In: Advances in Design for Inclusion: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016, pp. 529–540 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Duchowski, A.: Eye Tracking Methodology. Springer, London (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jantz, J.J., Watanabe, M., Everling, S., Munoz, D.P.: Threshold mechanism for saccade initiation in frontal eye field and superior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 109, 2767–2780 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mason, L., Pluchino, P., Tornatora, M.C., Ariasi, N.: An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. J. Exp. Educ. 81, 356–384 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Drusch, G., Bastien, J.M.C., Dinet, J.: From gaze plots to eye fixation patterns using a clustering method based on Hausdorff distances. In: Proceedings of the 23rd French Speaking Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 24–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall, S.P.: Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 78, B165–B175 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Klingner, J., Kumar, R., Hanrahan, P.: Measuring the task-evoked pupillary response with a remote eye tracker. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azam Majooni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Majooni, A., Akhavan, A., Offenhuber, D. (2019). An Eye-Tracking Study on Usability and Efficiency of Blackboard Platform. In: Di Bucchianico, G. (eds) Advances in Design for Inclusion. AHFE 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 776. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94622-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94621-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94622-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics