Skip to main content

Russell’s and Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomisms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Philosophy of Logical Atomism

Part of the book series: History of Analytic Philosophy ((History of Analytic Philosophy))

Abstract

This paper begins from a reading of Wittgenstein’s pre-war dictations, his 1914–1916 notebooks, and his “Proto-Protractatus”, an early version of the Tractatus that Wittgenstein drafted during the first two years of the war. By starting from work of Wittgenstein’s that is more directly in dialogue with Russell’s pre-war work than the Tractatus, we can better appreciate what they had in common and where they disagreed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius Ray Monk gives an account of the Russell–Wittgenstein relationship during the pre-war years on which Wittgenstein’s ideas were already at a very mature stage during his later conversations with Russell. As Monk sums up his interpretation in his chapter titles, Wittgenstein was first Russell’s protégé, in 1912, and then his master, in 1913 (Monk 1990: Chaps. 3–4).

  2. 2.

    Wittgenstein (2016: 4.0312). Cf. Wittgenstein (1979: 37, dated 25 Dec. 1914).

  3. 3.

    Cf. Wittgenstein (2016: 5.5422): “The correct explanation of the form of the proposition ‘A judges p’ must show that it is impossible to judge a nonsense. (Russell’s theory does not satisfy this condition.)”

  4. 4.

    Researchers can consult Schmidt (2016) and Pilch (2016) for facsimiles and transcriptions of many of the key documents, and there is a wealth of information about the structure of MS 104 and its relationship to both Tractatus and Notebooks 1914–1916 in Geschkowski (2001). However, all this material is only available in German, and its overall structure is far from easy to take in.

  5. 5.

    For more information, see the welcome page on that site, and for much more information, see Stern (2016, 2018). Parts of the final section of this chapter are based on Part 4 of Stern (2016).

References

Works by Other Authors

  • Flowers III, F. A. and Ian Ground (eds.) (2016). Portraits of Wittgenstein. 2 vols., second edition. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geschkowski, Andreas (2001). Die Entstehung von Wittgensteins Prototractatus. Bern: Books on Demand. Bern Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Jinho (2017). “Wittgenstein against Russell’s Theory of Judgment.” Presented at SSHAP, Calgary, May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landini, Gregory (2007). Wittgenstein’s Apprenticeship with Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, Brian (1989). “Wittgenstein’s Pre-Tractatus Manuscripts.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 33: 35–47. Reprinted with revisions in McGuinness 2002a.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, Brian (2002a). “Wittgenstein’s 1916 ‘Abhandlung’.” In Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy: A Reassessment After 50 Years: Proceedings of the 24th International Wittgenstein-Symposium, eds. Rudolf Haller and Klaus Puhl. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky. 2002: 272–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, Brian (2002b). Approaches to Wittgenstein: Collected Papers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, Ray (1990). Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilch, Martin (2015). “A Missing Folio at the Beginning of Wittgenstein’s MS 104.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review, Vol. 4, No. 2: 65–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilch, Martin (ed.) (2016). Wittgenstein Source Prototractatus Tools. http://www.wittgensteinsource.org

  • Potter, Michael (2009). Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Alfred (ed.) (2016). Wittgenstein Source Facsimile Edition of Tractatus Publication Materials. http://www.wittgensteinsource.org

  • Stern, David G. (2016). “The University of Iowa Tractatus Map.” Nordic Wittgenstein Review 5:2: 203–220. http://www.nordicwittgensteinreview.com/article/view/3437

  • Stern, David G. (2018). “Mapping the Tractatus.” In Proceedings of the 40th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium, eds. Christoph Limbeck and Friedrich Stadler. Göttingen: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1913). “Notes on Logic.” In L. Wittgenstein, Notebooks 1914–16. Ed. G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell: 93–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig TLP3 (2016). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Side-by-side-by-side edition, version 0.43. http://people.umass.edu/klement/tlp/

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1971). Prototractatus: an Early Version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, eds. B. F. McGuinness, T. Nyberg, and G. H. Von Wright, trs. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1979). Notebooks 1914–1916, second edition, G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe (eds.), tr. G. E. M. Anscombe. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1989). Logische-philosophische Abhandlung: kritische Edition. eds. B. F. McGuinness and J. Schulte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2012). Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951. Fourth edition. Ed. Brian McGuinness. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Stern .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stern, D.G. (2018). Russell’s and Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomisms. In: Elkind, L., Landini, G. (eds) The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. History of Analytic Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94364-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics