Abstract
We are concerned with the construction of “Weberized” metrics for image functions – distance functions which allow greater deviations at higher intensity values and lower deviations at lower intensity values in accordance with Weber’s models of perception. In this paper, we show how the use of appropriate nonuniform measures over the image function range space can be used to produce “Weberized” metrics. In the case of Weber’s standard model, the resulting metric is an \(L^1\) distance between logarithms of the image functions. For generalized Weber’s law, the metrics are \(L^1\) distances between appropriate powers of the image functions. We then define the corresponding \(L^2\) analogues of these metrics which are easier to work with because of their differentiability properties. Finally, we extend the definition of these “Weberized” metrics to vector-valued functions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AVIRIS: Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. http://aviris.jpl.nasa.gov
Brunet, D., Vrscay, E.R., Wang, Z.: Structural similarity-based approximation of signals and images using orthogonal bases. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M. (eds.) ICIAR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6111, pp. 11–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13772-3_2
Forte, B., Vrscay, E.R.: Solving the inverse problem for function and image approximation using iterated function systems. Dyn. Contin. Discrete Impuls. Syst. 1, 177–231 (1995)
Girod, B.: What’s wrong with mean squared error? In: Watson, A.B. (ed.) Digital Images and Human Vision. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)
Kowalik-Urbaniak, I.A., La Torre, D., Vrscay, E.R., Wang, Z.: Some “Weberized” \(L^2\)-based methods of signal/image approximation. In: Campilho, A., Kamel, M. (eds.) ICIAR 2014. LNCS, vol. 8814, pp. 20–29. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11758-4_3
Lee, S., Pattichis, M.S., Bovik, A.C.: Foveated video quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 4(1), 129–132 (2002)
Michon, J.A.: Note on the generalized form of Weber’s Law. Percept. Psychophys. 1, 329–330 (1966)
Oppenheim, A.V., Schafer, R.W., Stockham Jr., T.G.: Nonlinear filtering of multiplied and convolved signals. Proc. IEEE 56(8), 1264–1291 (1968)
Shen, J.: On the foundations of vision modeling I. Weber’s law and Weberized TV restoration. Physica D 175, 241–251 (2003)
Shen, J., Jung, Y.-M.: Weberized Mumford-Shah model with Bose-Einstein photon noise. Appl. Math. Optim. 53, 331–358 (2006)
Wandell, B.A.: Foundations of Vision. Sinauer, Sunderland (1995)
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26, 98–117 (2009)
Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., SHeikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600–612 (2004)
Wang, Z., Li, Q.: Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(5), 1185–1198 (2011)
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge that this research has been supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (ERV) in the form of a Discovery Grant. DLT and ERV dedicate this paper in memory of Prof. Bruno Forte (1928–2002), mentor, colleague and friend.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Sketch of Proof of Theorem 2
Appendix: Sketch of Proof of Theorem 2
We shall consider the “reverse” problem: Given the density function \(\rho (y)=1/y^a\), find the leading-order behaviour of f(x) such that
Differentiation with respect to x and a little manipulation yields the following differential equation (DE) for f(x),
In the case \(a=1\), we easily find that \(f(x)=x = x^1\). In the case \(a=0\), \(f'(x)=0\) which implies that \(f(x)=x^0\). For \(0< a < 1\), we shall assume that for x sufficiently large, the RHS of Eq. (22) may be approximated using the binomial theorem, which yields the following DE for f(x),
The solution of this DE is, up to a constant, \(f(x) = x^a\).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, D., La Torre, D., Vrscay, E.R. (2018). The Use of Intensity-Based Measures to Produce Image Function Metrics Which Accommodate Weber’s Models of Perception. In: Campilho, A., Karray, F., ter Haar Romeny, B. (eds) Image Analysis and Recognition. ICIAR 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10882. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93000-8_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93000-8_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93000-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)