Skip to main content

Magnetic Monopoles in Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Classical Electrodynamics

Part of the book series: UNITEXT for Physics ((UNITEXTPH))

  • 4068 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we examine the dynamics of a two-dyon system in the framework of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In quantum mechanics, the description of a physical system requires the introduction of a Hilbert space \(\mathcal{H}\), whose elements \(\psi \) represent the states of the system, and of a self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator H which determines the time evolution of the states. The operator H is obtained from the classical Hamiltonian via the recipe of canonical quantization, and the classical Hamiltonian descends, in turn, from the classical Lagrangian L of the system, via a Legendre transformation. Finally, the Lagrangian is uniquely determined by the classical equations of motion, modulo total derivatives. A prototypical example of this procedure is provided by a non-relativistic charged particle in the presence of an external electromagnetic field \(F^{\mu \nu }=(\mathbf {E},\mathbf {B})\), whose equation of motion is thus the Lorentz equation

$$\begin{aligned} m\mathbf {a}=e\left( \mathbf {E}+{\mathbf {v}\over c}\times \mathbf {B}\right) \!. \end{aligned}$$

If the tensor \(F^{\mu \nu }\) satisfies the Bianchi identity \(\partial _{[\mu }F_{\nu \rho ]}=0\), we can introduce a vector potential \(A^\mu =(A^0,\mathbf {A})\) such that \(F_{\mu \nu }=\partial _\mu A_\nu -\partial _\nu A_\mu \), and in this case we know that there exists a Lagrangian giving rise to the equation of motion (21.1), see formula (21.4) below. With this Lagrangian as starting point, the above process of canonical quantization then proceeds without meeting any obstacle, see Sect. 21.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    With respect to the notation adopted in previous chapters we have flipped the sign of \(\varLambda \).

  2. 2.

    In the present context, antiunitary operators do not play any role.

  3. 3.

    We shall return to the question of the domain of these operators below, when we analyze the regularity properties of the transition function \(e^{iD(\mathbf {x})}\).

  4. 4.

    Frequently, the eigenfunctions and eigenfunctionals of the fundamental observables of quantum mechanics are even more regular than the generic functions of their domain of self-adjointness, typically they are of class \(C^\infty \).

  5. 5.

    For instance, a sphere enclosing the origin, which is a subset of \(\mathbb {R}^3\setminus \{O\}\), cannot be deformed continuously to a point without crossing the origin.

  6. 6.

    For instance, a closed loop circling the curve \(\varGamma \) – a subset of \(V_0\) – cannot be deformed continuously to a point without crossing \(\varGamma \).

  7. 7.

    For the definition of the integral of a p-form over a p-dimensional manifold we refer the reader to the textbook [3].

  8. 8.

    In (co)homology theory, Poincaré duality regards boundaryless submanifolds, \(\partial M_p=\emptyset \), and, correspondingly, closed dual forms, \(dC_{D-p}=0\). In addition, this theory considers smooth representatives for the forms \(C_{D-p}\), differing from the latter by exact \((D-p)\)-forms. The variant of Poincaré duality presented by us in (21.61), where the dual forms \(C_{D-p}\) are singular, i.e. distribution-valued, has been developed by G. de Rham, see Ref. [4].

  9. 9.

    If D is even, the last integral in (21.63) carries the additional overall sign \((-)^{(D+1)p}\), coming from the graded commutation relation between differential forms (19.8).

  10. 10.

    Actually, it is possible to construct in the Hilbert space \(L^2(\mathbb {R}^3)\) a well-defined self-adjoint Hamiltonian, based on the formal expression \(H_\gamma \) (21.77) relative to a fixed Dirac string \(\gamma \), see Ref. [6]. However, in this case the derivation of the quantization condition (21.82) as a necessary condition for a consistent quantum theory of dyons becomes an extremely delicate task.

  11. 11.

    As the potentials \(\mathbf {A}_{1,2}\) are singular on the Dirac strings \(\gamma _{1,2}\), if we want the operators \(H_{1,2}\) to be well behaved, actually, we must slightly restrict the domains \(V_{1,2}\) by excluding from them small tubular neighborhoods around the strings \(\gamma _{1,2}\). The resulting deformed domains \(V_{1,2}^*\) still conform with our construction of the generalized Hilbert space of Sect. 21.2.

  12. 12.

    If the Lagrangian is given by (21.88), the exponent in Feynman’s formula (21.86) contains the integral of the Dirac potential (21.29) along a generic path \(\mathbf {r}(t)\), i.e. \(\int \mathbf {A}_\gamma \cdot d\mathbf {r}\). Since \(\mathbf {A}_\gamma \) is singular on the curve \(\gamma \), this integral diverges if the path \(\mathbf {r}(t)\) intersects \(\gamma \). However, it can be seen that the set of paths \(\mathbf {r}(t)\) which intersect a given curve has vanishing measure with respect to the path-integral measure \(\{\mathcal{D}\mathbf {r}(t)\}\), and so these divergences are irrelevant.

  13. 13.

    The validity of this theorem requires the distributional integrand not to be singular on the boundary of the domain of integration. Consequently, the integral (21.100) holds as long as the endpoints \(\mathbf {z}\) and \(\mathbf {x}\) do not belong to \(\varSigma \).

References

  1. M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics - II Fourier Analysis, Self-adjointness (Academic Press, New York, 1975)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P.A.M. Dirac, Quantized singularities in the electromagnetic field. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 133, 60 (1931)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Choquet-Bruhat, C. DeWitt-Morette, M. Dillard-Bleick, Analysis, Manifolds and Physics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. G. de Rham, Differentiable Manifolds: Forms, Currents, Harmonic Forms (Springer, Berlin, 1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. T.T. Wu, C.N. Yang, Concept of nonintegrable phase factors and global formulation of gauge fields. Phys. Rev. D 12, 3845 (1975)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. C.A. Hurst, Charge quantization and nonintegrable Lie algebras. Ann. Phys. 50, 51 (1968)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. R.P. Feynman, A.R. Hibbs, Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Lechner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lechner, K. (2018). Magnetic Monopoles in Quantum Mechanics. In: Classical Electrodynamics. UNITEXT for Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91809-9_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics