Abstract
The field of transitional justice struggles to explain why the universal human rights norms that trials promote become distorted or undermined when they reach their beneficiaries. The many studies of transitional justice are not in agreement over whether the process helps societies recover from past human rights abuses at all. This chapter outlines a theoretical framework based on a deliberative understanding of transitional justice, which is well-adapted to the study of norm contestation. Trials hold the capability to instigate discursive engagement and contestation among the public through deliberation that involves multiple interpretations of the past. As a mechanism for public debate, trials can therefore change narratives of nationalism. This framework helps unpack norm spillover effects in society and the top-down and bottom-up interactions that determine their efficacy. This helps explain how transitional justice has influenced local and collective understandings of the law and the past in Croatia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58, 239–275.
Acharya, A. (2009). Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian regionalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Anderson, E., & Pildes, R. H. (2000). Expressive theories of law: A general restatement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148, 1503–1575.
Baines, E. K. (2007). The haunting of Alice: Local approaches to justice and reconciliation in northern Uganda. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1, 91–114.
Bass, G. J. (2000). Stay the hand of vengeance: The politics of war crimes tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brooks, P., & Gewirtz, P. (1996). Law’s stories: Narrative and rhetoric in the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Browning, C. S. (2008). Constructivism, narrative and foreign policy analysis: A case study of Finland. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Carlsnaes, W., Simmons, B. A., & Risse, T. (2012). Handbook of international relations. London: Sage.
Cianetti, L. (2017). Tricke-down social inclusion: The EU minorities agenda in times of crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12618.
Clark, J. N. (2012). The ICTY and reconciliation in Croatia: A case study of Vukovar. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10, 397–417.
Dembour, M. B., & Kelly, T. (2007). Paths to international justice: Social and legal perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dragovic-Soso, J. (2014). The parting of ways: Public reckoning with the recent past in post-Milošević Serbia. In T. Waters (Ed.), The Milošević trial—An autopsy (pp. 389–408). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dragovic-Soso, J., & Gordy, E. (2010). Coming to terms with the past: Transitional justice and reconciliation in the post-Yugoslav lands. In D. Djokić & J. Ker-Lindsay (Eds.), New perspectives on Yugoslavia: Key issues and controversies (pp. 193–212). London: Routledge.
Drumbl, M. A. (2007). Atrocity, punishment and international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fatogoma, A. D. D. (2017). Resistance to transitional justice in the contact of political violence in Côte d’Ivoire. In B. Jones & J. Bernath (Eds.), Resistance and transitional justice (pp. 17–34). London: Routledge.
Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving: Essays in the theory of responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52, 887–917.
Fox, J. E., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008). Everyday nationhood. Ethnicities, 8, 536–563.
Gordy, E. (2014). Guilt, responsibility, and denial: The past at stake in post-Milošević Serbia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hafner-Burton, E., & Ron, J. (2007). Human rights institutions: Rhetoric and efficacy. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 379–384.
Hafner-Burton, E., & Tsutsui, K. (2007). Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 407–425.
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory (L. Coser, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hampton, J. (1984). Moral education theory of punishment. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13, 208–238.
Haslam, E. (2007). Law, civil society and contested justice at the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda. In M. B. Dembour & T. Kelly (Eds.), Paths to international justice: Social and legal perspectives (pp. 57–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horne, C. M. (2015). The timing of transitional justice measures. In N. Nedelsky & L. Stan (Eds.), Post-communist transitional justice: Lessons from twenty-five years of experience (pp. 123–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
ICTY Appeals Chamber. (2004). Prosecutor v. Kordić and Čerkez, IT-95-14/2-A.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kent, L. (2011). Local memory practices in East Timor: Disrupting transitional justice narratives. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5, 434–455.
Kritz, N. J. (1995). Transitional justice: How emerging democracies reckon with former regimes. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Lamont, C. K. (2004). A new Croatian right: Nationalist political parties and contemporary Croatian politics. Balkanistica, 17, 45–66.
Lamont, C. K. (2010). International criminal justice and the politics of compliance. Farnham: Ashgate.
Lawther, C. (2017). The truth about loyalty: Emotions, ex-Combatants and transitioning from the past. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11, 484–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijx019.
Lutz, E., & Sikkink, S. (2001). The justice cascade: The evolution and impact of foreign human rights trails in Latin America. Chicago Journal of International Law, 2, 1–33.
Lynch, M., & Marchesi, B. (2015). The adoption and impact of transitional justice. In N. Nedelsky & L. Stan (Eds.), Post-communist transitional justice: Lessons from twenty-five years of experience (pp. 73–98). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mani, R. (2002). Beyond retribution: Seeking justice in the shadows of war. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McEvoy, K., & McGregor, L. (2008). Transitional justice from below: Grassroots activism and the struggle for change. Oxford: Hart.
McMahon, P. C., & Forsythe, D. P. (2008). The ICTY’s impact on Serbia: Judicial romanticism meets network politics. Human Rights Quarterly, 30, 412–435.
Meyer, C. O. (2005). Convergence towards a European strategies culture? A constructivist framework for explaining changing norms. European Journal of International Relations, 11, 523–549.
Millar, G. (2012). Between western theory and local practice: Cultural impediments to truth-telling in Sierra Leone. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 29, 177–199.
Miller, Z. (2008). Effects of invisibility: In search of the ‘economic’ in transitional justice. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2, 266–291.
Nagy, R. (2008). Transitional justice as global project: Critical reflections. Third World Quarterly, 29, 275–289.
Nettelfield, L. J. (2010). Courting democracy in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Hague tribunal’s impact in a postwar state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neumann, I. B. (1999). Uses of the other: “The East” in European identity formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Nora, P. (1992). Les lieux de mémoire. Paris: Gallimard.
Obradović-Wochnik, J. (2013a). Ethnic conflict and war crimes in the Balkans: The narratives of denial in post-conflict Serbia. London: I.B. Tauris.
Obradović-Wochnik, J. (2013b). Serbian civil society as an exclusionary space: NGOs, the public and “coming to terms with the past”. In V. Bojičić-Dželilović, J. Ker-Lindsay, & D. Kostovicova (Eds.), Civil society and transitions in the western Balkans (pp. 210–229). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Osiel, M. (1998). Mass atrocity, collective memory and the law. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Osiel, M. (2009). Making sense of mass atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostojić, M. (2014). Between justice and stability: The politics of war crimes prosecutions in post-Milošević Serbia. Farnham: Ashgate.
Pavlaković, V. (2007). Eye of the storm: The ICTY, commemorations and contested histories of Croatia’s Homeland War. Wilson Center. Available at https://wilsoncenter.org/publication/347-eye-the-storm-the-icty-commemorations-and-contested-histories-croatias-homeland-war. Accessed 23 Nov 2012.
Pavlaković, V. (2010). Croatia, the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and general Gotovina as a political symbol. Europe-Asia Studies, 62, 1707–1740.
Pavlaković, V. (2014). Fulfilling the thousand-year-old dream: Strategies of symbolic nation-building in Croatia. In P. Kolstø (Ed.), Strategies of symbolic nation-building in south eastern Europe (pp. 19–50). Farnham: Ashgate.
Peskin, V., & Boduszynski, M. (2003). International justice and domestic politics: Post-Tudjman Croatia and the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Europe-Asia Studies, 55, 1117–1142.
Rangelov, I. (2014). Nationalism and the rule of law: Lessons from the Balkans and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rangelov, I., & Teitel, R. G. (2011). Global civil society and transitional justice. In M. Albrow, H. Seckinelgin, H. Anheier, et al. (Eds.), Global civil society 2011: Globality and the absence of justice (pp. 162–177). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roht-Arriaza, N. (2006). The new landscape of transitional justice. In N. Roht-Arriaza & J. Mariezcurrena (Eds.), Transitional justice in the twenty-first century: Beyond truth versus justice (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, R. (2007). Memory frictions: Localizing the truth and reconciliation commission in Sierra Leone. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 1, 183–207.
Sikkink, K., & Walling, C. B. (2007). The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44, 427–445.
Smith, A. L. (2004). Heteroglossia, “common sense,” and social memory. American Ethnologist, 31, 251–269.
Snyder, J. L., & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28, 5–44.
Sommers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23, 605–649.
Sriram, C. L. (2007). Justice as peace? Liberal peacebuilding and strategies of transitional justice. Global Society, 21, 579–591.
Stover, E., & Weinsten, H. M. (2004). My neighbor, my enemy: Justice and community in the aftermath of mass atrocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ströhle, I. (2013). Kosovo Liberation Army veterans’ politics and contentious citizenship in post-war Kosovo. In S. Pavlović & M. Živković (Eds.), Transcending fratricide: Political mythologies, reconciliations, and the uncertain future in the former Yugoslavia (pp. 243–264). Nomos: Baden-Baden.
Subotic, J. (2009). Hijacked justice: Dealing with the past in the Balkans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Subotic, J. (2015). Genocide narratives as narratives-in-dialogue. Journal of Regional Security, 10, 177–198.
Teitel, R. G. (2000). Transitional justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tholens, S. (2012) International norms and local agents in peacebuilding: Small arms control in post-war Kosovo and Cambodia. PhD thesis, European University Institute.
Thoms, O., Ron, J., & Paris, R. (2010). State-level effects of transitional justice: What do we know? The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4, 329–354.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, H. (1984). The question of narrative in contemporary historical theory. History and Theory, 23, 1–33.
Zambelli, N. (2010). A journey westward: A poststructuralist analysis of Croatia’s identity and the problem of cooperation with the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Europe-Asia Studies, 62, 1661–1682.
Zimmermann, L. (2017). More for less: The interactive translation of global norms in postconflict Guatemala. International Studies Quarterly, 61, 774–785.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sokolić, I. (2019). Transitional Justice as a Means of Deliberating the Past. In: International Courts and Mass Atrocity. Memory Politics and Transitional Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90841-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90841-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90840-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90841-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)