Skip to main content

Superorganism Concept

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 260 Accesses

The Early Superorganism Concept

It has long been noticed that durable social groups have a certain structural similarity with individual animals. In this view, any society can be regarded as a “superorganism”, effectively an organism made up of organisms. This concept was first made explicit in sociology in the late nineteenth century – think of the long-standing expression body politic – and not long afterward was applied to social groups of nonhuman animals.

As applied to social insects, the analogy has given rise to such terms as colony, drone, queen, slavery, soldier, and worker. The analogy was treated as a more or less casual metaphor until, about a century ago, the world’s leading specialist on ants, William Morton Wheeler made a strong case for applying it to social insects [16]. He noted that the colony resembles a metazoan body in a number of striking ways. Among these, it shows a division of labor among its constituent members and a colony cyclemirroring the individual...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Abbot, P., et al. (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471, E1–E4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems (p. 307). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boomsma, J. J., & Gawne, R. (2018). Superorganismality and caste differentiation as points of no return: How the major evolutionary transitions were lost in translation. Biological Reviews, 93, 28–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boomsma, J. J., Beekman, M., Cornwallis, C. K., Griffin, A. S., Holman, L., Hughes, W. O. H., Keller, L., Oldroyd, B. P., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2011). Only full-sibling families evolved eusociality. Nature, 471, E4–E5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Foster, K. R., Wenseleers, T., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2006). Kin selectin is the key to altruism. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 57–60. (Immediately followed by a criticism from Fletcher, J. A., et al. and a reply Foster, et al.).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gadagkar, R. (2010). Sociobiology in turmoil again. Current Science, 99, 1036–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gillooly, J. F., Hou, C., & Kaspari, M. (2010). Eusocial organisms as superorganisms: Insights from metabolic theory. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 3, 360–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (2009). The superorganism (p. 576). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hou, C. M., Kaspari, M., Vander Zanden, H. B., & Gillooly, J. F. (2010). Energetic basis of colonial liviing in social insects, 107, 3634–3638.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes, W. O. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Beekman, M., & Ratnieks, F. L. W. (2008). Ancestral monogramy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science, 320, 1213–1216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., & Wilson, E. O. (2010). The evolution of sociality. Nature, 466, 1057–1062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reeve, H. K., & Hölldobler, B. (2007). The emergence of a superorganism through intergroup competition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 9736–9740.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Seeley, T. D. (1997). Honey bee colonies are group-level adaptive units. American Naturalist, 150(Suppl), 522–541.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seeley, T. D. (2010). Honeybee democracy (p. 280). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Starks, P. T., Blackie, C. A., & Seeley, T. D. (2000). Fever in honeybee colonies. Naturwissenschaften, 87, 229–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wheeler, W. M. (1911). The ant-colony as an organism. Journal of Morphology, 22, 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson, E. O. (2008). One giant leap: How insects achieved altruism and colonial life. BioScience, 58, 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson, E. O. (2012). The social conquest of earth (p. 352). New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson, E. O., & Hölldobler, B. (2005). Eusociality: Origin and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 13367–13371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher K. Starr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Starr, C.K. (2020). Superorganism Concept. In: Starr, C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Social Insects. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_122-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_122-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90306-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90306-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics