Skip to main content

Two Sector Growth Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Growth and Development

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 1045 Accesses

Abstract

This section provides an introduction to two sector growth models. We begin with a model where a single good is produced using traditional means of production. In the traditional sector, production is carried out by households using land (natural resources) and labor. There are no firms or factories that rely on heavy plant and equipment and modern production methods to produce goods. This setting can be used to identify the conditions necessary for a modern sector to appear that would begin an “industrial revolution,” as in Hansen and Prescott (2002), helping to explain G8 and G9.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The East consists of China , Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Japan , Burma, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand. The West consists of Western European countries and their ethnic offshoots: Canada, Mexico, USA, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Australia, and New Zealand.

  2. 2.

    Human capital and fertility are treated exogenously in this chapter. We add endogenous schooling and fertility back into the model in Chap. 7.

  3. 3.

    To review eigenvalues and eigenvectors consult the technical appendices of Azariadis (1993) or an undergraduate linear algebra textbook.

  4. 4.

    This need not be the only interpretation because primary products such as wood and coal might also be included.

  5. 5.

    For further discussion and application of the energy balance relationship see Abdus (2007).

  6. 6.

    Establishing an endogenous intergenerational connection between child nutrition and adult height is difficult. In the nineteenth century, adult height in England showed no trend, despite a rise in per capita income. This puzzling observation has given rise to a literature that identifies a variety of factors that potentially affect adult height (Kirby (1995), Komlos (1998), and Voth and Leunig (1996)). Modern studies also reveal the complex determination of adult height. For example, food intake is not strongly correlated with height (Graham et al. (1981), Ashworth and Millward (1986), and Mitchell (1962)).

  7. 7.

    In a complete general equilibrium analysis, there would also be a reduction in k as workers move into the modern sector for a given aggregate capital stock. For an analysis of the structural transformation that depends heavily on the demand side effects stemming from subsistence constraints see Herrendorf et al. (2014).

References

  • Abdus S (2007) Obesity: A dynamic structural model of individuals’ body weight choice. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdus S, Rangazas P (2011) Adult nutrition and growth. Review of economic dynamics 14(4):636–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Robinson J (2012) Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth A, Millward D (1986) Catch-up growth in children. Nutrition reviews 44(5):157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azariadis C (1993) Intertemporal macroeconomics. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark G (2007) A farewell to alms. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costa D (1996) Health and labor force participation of older men, 1900–1991. Journal of economic history 56(1):62–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts N (1995) Exogenous of endogenous growth? The industrial revolution reconsidered. Journal of economic history 55(4):745–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel R (1994) Economic growth, population theory, and physiology: The bearing of long-term processes on the making of economic policy. American economic review 84(3):369–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor O (2005) From stagnation to growth: A unified theory. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor O (2011) Unified growth theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galor O, Weil D (2000) Population, technology, and growth: From Malthusian stagnation to modern economic growth. American economic review 90(4):806–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham GG, Creed HM, MacLean Jr WC, Kallman CH, Rabold J, Mellits ED (1981) Determinants of growth among poor children: Nutrient intake –achieved growth relationships. The American journal of clinical nutrition 34:539–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbakuk J (1962) American and British technology in the Nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen G, Prescott E (2002) Malthus to Solow. American economic review 92(4):1205–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrendorf B, Rogerson R, Valentinyi A (2014) Growth and the structural transformation. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirbey P (1995) Causes of Short stature among coal-mining children 1823–1850. Economic history review, 687–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komlos J (1998) Shrinking in a growing economy? The mystery of physical stature during the industrial revolution. Journal of economic history 58(3):779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas R (2002) Lecture on economic growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison A (1995) Monitoring the world economy, 1820–199. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell H (1962) Nutrition in relation to stature. Journal of the American dietetic association 40:521–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourmouras A, Rangazas P (2009) Reconciling Kuznets and Habbakuk in a unified growth model. Journal of economic growth 14(2):149–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parente S, Prescott E (2000) Barriers to riches. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Voth H, Leunig T (1996) Did smallpox reduce height? Stature and the standard of living in London, 1770–1873. Economic history review 49(3):541–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney E, Cataldo C (1983) Understanding normal and clinical nutrition. West-Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson J (2011) Trade and poverty: When the third world fell behind. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Das, S., Mourmouras, A., Rangazas, P. (2018). Two Sector Growth Models. In: Economic Growth and Development. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89755-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics