Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of African Women's Studies pp 1–25Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Feminist Legal Theory, Human Rights, and Culture in Africa

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 201 Accesses

Abstract

This article asserts the centrality of a paradigmatic shift in understandings about culture to invigorate the analysis of feminist legal theory for the purposes of African Women’s Studies. Drawing on cumulative lessons learned from evolving knowledge and experience vis-à-vis gender reform through law in Africa, the article elucidates pragmatic considerations for privileging culture as a conducive technology to advance the global governance agenda to safeguard women’s rights. A meaningful discussion of feminist legal theory within the context of Africa will not be complete without a critical assessment of the international human rights regime which irrigated possibilities for gender reform, especially for many African countries struggling with grave governance challenges and seemingly bereft of the necessary infrastructure to undergird the rule of law. Accordingly, a focal point of this article features the Maputo Protocol which is Africa’s distinctive contribution to enhance the gender responsiveness of the human rights ecosystem. Exploring the fundamentals for an organic way to help rationalize the efficiency and creativity of ongoing legal efforts to amplify women’s welfare and agency, the article posits the indispensability of identifying and tapping into what is right with Africa as a research frontier that demands uncompromising attention for feminist legal theory in particular and women’s studies in general.

In keeping with the categorization of the Palgrave Handbook of African Women’s Studies as a major reference work, this article begins with a comprehensive overview of the subject of feminist legal theory to lay the groundwork for delving into novel argumentation about a decisive next step forward for scholarship and teaching. Hence, historicizing the emergence of feminist scholarship in the legal academy, the article addresses salient theoretical perspectives and delineates important doctrines, discourses, institutions, and practices that provided the impetus for feminist theory in the field of law. Foregrounding the limits of gender as an analytic category, the article underscores major debates that have contoured and broadened the frame of feminist legal inquiry. Building on these precursors, the piece canvasses pivotal lessons of measurable efforts targeted at the efficacious elimination of gender discrimination through law as a springboard to proffer a profile becoming of the future of African Women’s Studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Abrams, K. (2011). Introduction: The distinctive energies of ‘normal science’. Issues in Legal Scholarship, 9(2), 1. Available at https://works.bepress.com/kathryn_abrams/93/

  • Ackerly, B. A. (2008). Universal human rights in a world of difference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agosin, M. (2001). Women, Gender, and Human Rights: A Global Perspective. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhami, M., Erturk, Y., & Mayer, A. E. (Eds.). (2019). Feminist advocacy, family law and violence against women: International perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. J., & Mohanty, C. T. (2001). Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies & democratic futures (pp. 46–62). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. (2012). From Cape Town to Kabul: Rethinking strategies for pursuing women’s human rights. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, S. (2019). Power shift: The longest revolution paperback. Toronto: House of Anansi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayeni, V. O. (Ed.). (2016). The impact of the African charter and the Maputo protocol in selected African states. Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badran, M. (Ed.). (2011). Gender and Islam in Africa: Rights, sexuality and law. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. A. (1999). Our lives before the law: Constructing a feminist jurisprudence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.32654.0001.001

  • Banda, F. (2005). Women, law and human rights: An African perspective. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, K. T. (2012). Centennial tribute issue: Feminist legal scholarship: A history through the lens of the California law review. California Law Review, 100, 381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, K., Rhode, D., & Grossman, J. (Eds.). (2017). Gender and law: Theory, doctrine, commentary. New York: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R. H., Mudimbe, V. Y., & O’Barr, J. (Eds.). (1993). Africa and the disciplines: The contributions of research in Africa to the social sciences and humanities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay, E. G. (1982). Women and work in Africa. Boulder: Westview Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04118.0001.001

  • Bentham, J. (2013). Rights, representation, and reform: Nonsense upon stilts and other writings on the French revolution. In P. Schofield, C. Pease-Watkin, & C. Blamires (Eds.), The collected works of Jeremy Bentham (pp. 317–401). Oxford: Minerva Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, I., & White, E. F., (1999). Women in sub-Saharan Africa: Restoring women to history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04113.0001.001

  • Berger, I. (2016). Women in twenty-first century Africa: New approaches to African history. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. (1993). Hegemony on a shoestring. In S. Berry (Ed.), No condition is permanent: The social dynamics of agrarian change in sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 22–42). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.02563.0001.001

  • Bindel, J. (2019). The pimping of prostitution: Abolishing the sex work myth. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. London: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. & Thomas, P. (2016) Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning by Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S., & Todd, W. B. (1981). Adam Smith: An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Book I, Chapter II (pp. 26–27). Retrieved from http://files.libertyfund.org/files/220/0141-02_Bk.pdf

  • Crenshaw, Kimberle (1989) “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics,” University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 1989, Article 8. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

  • Chanock, M. (1982). Making customary law: Men, women and courts in colonial Northern Rhodesia. In M. J. Hay & M. Wright (Eds.), African women and the law: Historical perspectives (pp. 53–67). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04127.0001.001

  • Chanock, M. (1991). Paradigm, policies and property. In K. Mann & R. Roberts (Eds.), Law in colonial Africa (pp. 61–84). Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, H., Merry, S. E., Chimni, B. S., Couso, J., Halliday, T., Korhonen, O., Lin, V., Medina, E., Obiora, L., Rodríguez-Garavito, C., Shaffer, G., Urueña, R., & Okediji, R. (2018). International organizations and technologies of governance. In Rethinking society for the 21st century, report of the International Panel on Social Progress (p. 457). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J. L. & Roberts, S. (1981) Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J. L., & Roberts, S. (1977). Marriage and extra-marital sexuality: The dialectics of legal change among the Kgatla. Journal of African Law, 21, 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. & Molyneux, M. (Eds.). (2008). The Politics of Rights: Dilemmas for Feminist Praxis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B. M. (2019). Countless blessings: A history of childbirth and reproduction in the Sahel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coquery-Vidrovitch, C. (1997). African women: A modern history. Boulder: Westview Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04125.0001.001

  • Cornwall, A. (2005). Readings in gender in Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04122.0001.001

  • Dawuni, J. J. (Ed.). (2019). International courts and the African woman judge: Unveiled narrative. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Silva, S., Paci, P., & Posadas, J. (2014). Lessons learned and not yet learned from a multicountry initiative on women’s economic empowerment. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, A. C., & Baderoon, G. (2018). African feminisms: Cartographies for the twenty-first century. Meridians, 17(2), 219–231. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey, M. (2009). Prosecuting domestic violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux, M. (2000). Cultural pluralism and dilemmas of justice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveaux, M. (2007). Gender and justice in multicultural liberal states. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson, D. (2007). Property in the body: Feminist perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, K. (2020). The grip of sexual violence in conflict: Feminist interventions in international law. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, M. (Ed.). (2011). Transcending the boundaries of law: Generations of feminism and legal theory. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, M. A. (Ed.). (2018). Vulnerability and the legal organization of work: Gender in law, culture, and society. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, R., & McCarthy, B. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford handbook of gender, sex, and crime. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, S. (2002). Women in African colonial histories. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04111.0001.001

  • Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lasch (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göle, N. (2013). The forbidden modern: Civilization and veiling. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04703.0001.001

  • Grey, R. (2019). Prosecuting sexual and gender-based crimes at the International Criminal Court: Practice, progress and potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hafkin, N. J. (1976). Women in Africa: Studies in social and economic change. Stanford: Stanford University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.02070.0001.001

  • Hallward-Driemeier, M., Hasan, T., & Iqbal, S. (2013). Women’s legal rights over 50 years: What is the impact of reform (World Bank policy research working paper no. 6617). Washington, DC: World Bank, Development Research Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, W. (2016). The Palgrave handbook of gender and development: Critical engagements in feminist theory and practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (1990). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review, 42(3), 581–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, C. (2015). Women, peace and security in Africa. African Security Review, 24, 364–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henn, E. V. (2019). International human rights law and structural discrimination: The example of violence against women. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshman, L. (2019). Reckoning: The epic battle against sexual abuse and harassment. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. L. (2001). “Wicked” women and the reconfiguration of gender in Africa. Portsmouth: Heinemann. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04115.0001.001

  • Hohfeld, W. N. (2016). Fundamental legal concepts as applied in judicial reasoning. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohfeld, W. N. (1913). Fundamental Legal Conceptions. 23 Yale Journal, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O. W. (1897). The path of the law. Harvard Law Review, 10(8), 457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. (1995). Producing knowledge in Africa today. African Studies Review, 38(3), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. (2009). Knowledge of Africa, knowledge by Africans: Two perspectives on African studies. RCCS Annual Review, 1, 1. Portugal: University of Coimbra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indra, D. M. (2008). Engendering forced migration: Theory and practice. New York: Berghahn Books. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.08671.0001.001

  • Irving, H. (2008). Gender and the constitution: Equity and agency in comparative constitutional design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, S., & Palmer, S. (Eds.). (2002). Visible women: Essays on feminist legal theory and political philosophy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (2016). Gender equality, economic growth, and women’s agency: The “endless variety” and “monotonous similarity” of patriarchal constraints. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1090009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, J., & Twohey, M. (2019). She said: Breaking the sexual harassment story that helped ignite a movement. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim, S., & Beardsley, K. (2019). Equal opportunity peacekeeping: Women, peace, and security in post-conflict states. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, J., & Twigg, S. (2015). Gender at work in Africa: Legal constraints and opportunities for reform (Working paper no. 3). Oxford, UK: Oxford Human Rights Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuovo, S., & Pearson, Z. E. (2011). Feminist perspectives on contemporary international law: Between resistance and compliance. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, J. (2011). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 242–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (2006). Are women human? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. (2007) Are Women Human? And Other International Dialogues. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meillon, C. & Bunch, C. (Eds.) (2001). Holding on to the Promise: Women’s Human Rights and the Beijing + 5 Review. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center for Women’s Global Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C., & Siegel, R. (Eds.). (2004). Directions in sexual harassment. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04721.0001.001

  • Mayeri, S. (2014). Reasoning from race: Feminism, law, and the civil rights revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31486.0001.001

  • McLaren, M. A. (2019). Women’s activism, feminism, and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2006). Muslim women’s quest for equality: Between Islamic law and feminism. Critical Inquiry, 32, 629–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza, Q. (Ed.). (2006). Islamic feminism & the law. London: Routledge Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. M. (2005). Globalizing women: Transnational feminist networks. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. (1984). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12, 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, M., & Razavi, S. (Eds.). (2002). Gender justice, development, and rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudimbe, V. Y. (1988). The invention of Africa: Gnosis, philosophy and order of knowledge. Oxford: James Curey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhs, G., Niemann, Y. F., Gonzalez, C. G., & Harris, A. P. (Eds.). (2012). Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. C. (2019). Black feminism reimagined: After intersectionality. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ndulo, M. (2011). African customary law, customs and women’s rights. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 18(1), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (1993). Reconsidering African customary law. Legal Studies Forum, XVII, 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (1995). New wine, old skin: (En)gaging nationalism. Indiana Law Review, 28, 575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (1996). Neither here nor there: of the female in American legal education. Law and Social Inquiry, 21, 355. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (1997a). Bridges and barricades: Rethinking polemics and intransigence in the campaign against female circumcision. Case Western Law Review, 47, 275–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (1997b). Feminism, globalization and culture: After Beijing. Journal of Global Legal Studies, 4, 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (2004). Supri, supri, supri oyibo? Signs Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 29, 649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L.A. (2005) Book Review, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 31:1, 256–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (2015). Probing the parameters of gender, power, and democracy in Nigeria. In M. Vianello & M. Hawksworth (Eds.), Gender and power: Towards equality and democratic governance (pp. 64–81). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A. (2019). Culture and Development: A Bias for Hope in Africa. In L. Meldolesi & N. Stame (Eds), A Bias for Hope: Second Conference on Albert Hirschman’s Legacy (pp. 108–123). Retrieved from https://colornihirschman.org/news/16/e-book-second-conference-on-albert-hirschmans-legacy-a-bias-for-hope

  • Obiora, L. A., & Toomey, S. (2010). Federalism and gender politics in Nigeria. In M. Haussman, M. Sawer, & J. Vickers (Eds.), Feminism, federalism and multi-level governance (pp. 211–228). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obiora, L. A., & Whalen, C. (2015). What is right with Africa: The promise of the protocol on women’s rights. Transnational Human Rights Review, 2, 153–167. (First Published in 2010 Pambazuka 507). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/thr/

  • Okin, S. (1991). Justice, gender and the family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1995). Inequality between the sexes in different cultural contexts. In M. Nussbaum & J. Glover (Eds.), Women, culture & development (pp. 274–297). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oren, T., & Press, A. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of contemporary feminism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannikar, R. (1982). Is the Notion of Human Rights a Western Concept? 30:120, 75–102. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Journals

    Google Scholar 

  • Panikkar, R., & Sharma, A. (2007). Human rights as a Western concept. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C., & Mills, C. (2007). Contract and domination. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quraishi, A. (2011). What if Sharia weren’t the enemy? Rethinking International Women’s Rights Advocacy on Islamic Law. Columbia Journal of Gender and the Law, 22, 173–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranger, T. (1983). The invention of tradition in colonial Africa. In E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 211, 254). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhode, D. (1991). The ‘no-problem’ problem: Feminist challenges and cultural changes. Yale Law Review, 100, 1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, C. C. (1986). Women and class in Africa. New York: Africana Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.04143.0001.001

  • Rubenstein, K., & Young, K. G. (Eds.). (2018). The public law of gender: From the local to the global. New York: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, S., & Sita, A. (2011). Women of Africa – An untapped economic force for growth. Johannesburg: Ernst & Young.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satz, D., & Reich, R. (2009). Toward a humanistic justice: The political philosophy of Susan Moller Okin. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, U., Shaw, G., Thornton, M., & Auchmuty, R. (Eds.). (2020). Gender and careers in the legal academy (Oñati international series in law and society). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1986). Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review, 91, 1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1990, December 20). More than one million women are still missing. The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1990/12/20/more-than-100-million-women-are-missing/

  • Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. (2011). Gender, law and justice in a global market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tamale, S. (2006). African feminism: How should we change? Development, 49, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamale, S. (2008). The right to culture and the culture of rights: A critical perspective on women’s sexual rights in Africa. Feminist Legal Studies, 16, 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. M. (2003). Politics of the womb: Women, reproduction, and the state in Kenya. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.02668.0001.001

  • Tripp, A. M., Casimiro, I., Kwesiga, J., & Mungwa, A. (2009). African women’s movements: Changing political landscapes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. E. (2008). Women, family, and gender in Islamic law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.30812.0001.001

  • United Nations. (1980). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. U.N. DOC. A/RES/34/46.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1994). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. U.N. GAOR 3D COMM., 48TH SESS., 85TH PLEN. MTG. AT 3, U.N. DOC. A/RES/48/104.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015a). Realizing the right to development: Essays in commemoration of 25 years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015b). Millennium development goals report. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2019). Sustainable development goals report. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, African Women’s Rights Observatory. http://www1.uneca.org/awro/overview.aspx

  • United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. (2006). Reservations to CEDAW. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/reservations.htm

  • United Nations General Assembly. (1993). Vienna declaration and programme of action, note by the secretariate. A/CONF.157/23 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2016). Women’s rights in Africa. Addis Ababa: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vansina, J. (2004). How societies are born: Governance in West Central Africa before 1600. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.09267.0001.001

  • Wael, R. (2019). Negotiating the power of NGOs: Women’s legal rights in South Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J., & Williams, M. S. (2008). Toleration and its limits. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, L (Ed.) (2001). Women’s Rights: A Global View. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, M. (1990). If women counted: A new feminist economics. San Francisco: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, L., & Maclean, M. (1992). Economic consequences of divorce: International perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (1992). The alchemy of race and rights. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2010). Reshaping the work-family debate: Why men and class matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1792). A vindication of the rights of woman: With strictures on political and moral subjects. London: Joseph Johnson.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2018). The global gender gap report. Geneva: WEF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA

    L. Amede Obiora

Authors
  1. L. Amede Obiora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Amede Obiora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Nigeria

    Olajumoke Yacob-Haliso

  2. Department of History, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Toyin Falola

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Babcock University, Ilishan Remo, Nigeria

    Olajumoke Yacob-Haliso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Obiora, L.A. (2019). Feminist Legal Theory, Human Rights, and Culture in Africa. In: Yacob-Haliso, O., Falola, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of African Women's Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77030-7_131-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77030-7_131-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77030-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77030-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference HistoryReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation