Skip to main content

Evaluating Different Similarity Measures for Automatic Biomedical Text Summarization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 736))

Abstract

Automatic biomedical text summarization is maturing and can provide a solution for biomedical researchers to access the information they need efficiently. Biomedical summarization approaches often rely on the similarity measure to model the source document, mainly when they employ redundancy removal or graph structures. In this paper, we examine the impact of the similarity measure on the performance of the summarization methods. We model the document as a weighted graph. Various similarity measures are used to build different graphs based on biomedical concepts, semantic types and a combination of them. We next use the graphs to generate and evaluate the automatic summaries. The results suggest that the selection of the similarity measure has a substantial effect on the quality of the summaries (≈37% improvement in ROUGE-2 metric, and ≈29% in ROUGE-SU4). The results also demonstrate that exploiting both biomedical concepts and semantic types yields slightly better performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. MEDLINE. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/pmresources.html. Accessed 7 Oct 2017

  2. Afantenos, S., Karkaletsis, V., Stamatopoulos, P.: Summarization from medical documents: a survey. J. Artif. Intel. Med. 33, 157–177 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fleuren, W.W.M., Alkema, W.: Application of text mining in the biomedical domain. J. Meth. 74, 97–106 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, K.S.: Automatic summarising: the state of the art. J. Inf. Process. Manage. 43, 1449–1481 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mishra, R., Bian, J., Fiszman, M., Weir, C.R., Jonnalagadda, S., Mostafa, J., et al.: Text summarization in the biomedical domain: a systematic review of recent research. J. Biomed. Inform. 52, 457–467 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reeve, L.H., Han, H., Nagori, S., Yang, J.C., Schwimmer, T.A.: Concept frequency distribution in biomedical text summarization. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 604–611 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sarkar, K.: Using domain knowledge for text summarization in medical domain. Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. 1, 200–205 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plaza, L., Díaz, A., Gervás, P.: A semantic graph-based approach to biomedical summarisation. J. Artif. Intell. Med. 53, 1–14 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, C.-Y.: Rouge: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Text Summarization Branches Out, Workshop of ACL (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gambhir, M., Gupta, V.: Recent automatic text summarization techniques: a survey. J. Artif. Intell. Rev. 47, 1–66 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yao, J.-G., Wan, X., Xiao, J.: Recent advances in document summarization. J. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 53, 297–336 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelson, S.J., Powell, T., Humphreys, B.L.: The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) project, Encyclopedia of library (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reeve, L.H., Han, H., Brooks, A.D.: BioChain: lexical chaining methods for biomedical text summarization. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 180–184. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yoo, I., Hu, X., Song, I.-Y.: A coherent graph-based semantic clustering and summarization approach for biomedical literature and a new summarization evaluation method. J. BMC Bioinform. 8, S4 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Menendez, H.D., Plaza, L., Camacho, D.: A genetic graph-based clustering approach to biomedical summarization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, pp. 1–8. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fiszman, M., Demner-Fushman, D., Kilicoglu, H., Rindflesch, T.C.: Automatic summarization of MEDLINE citations for evidence-based medical treatment: a topic-oriented evaluation. J. Biomed. Inform. 42, 801–813 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, H., Fiszman, M., Shin, D., Wilkowski, B., Rindflesch, T.C.: Clustering cliques for graph-based summarization of the biomedical research literature. J. BMC Bioinform. 14, 182 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, H., Fiszman, M., Shin, D., Miller, C.M., Rosemblat, G., Rindflesch, T.C.: Degree centrality for semantic abstraction summarization of therapeutic studies. J. Biomed. Inform. 44, 830–838 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reeve, L.H., Han, H., Brooks, A.D.: The use of domain-specific concepts in biomedical text summarization. J. Inf. Process. Manage. 43, 1765–1776 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Plaza, L.: Comparing different knowledge sources for the automatic summarization of biomedical literature. J. Biomed. Inform. 52, 319–328 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Plaza, L., Carrillo-de-Albornoz, J.: Evaluating the use of different positional strategies for sentence selection in biomedical literature summarization. J. BMC Bioinform. 14, 71 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han, J., Kamber, M., Pei, J.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Burlington (2011)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: TextRank: bringing order into text. In: Proceeding of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 404–411 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Library of Medicine. MetaMap portal. https://mmtx.nlm.nih.gov/. Accessed 25 May 2017

  25. Doherty, J.L., Owen, M.J.: Genomic insights into the overlap between psychiatric disorders: implications for research and clinical practice. J. Genome Med. 6, 29 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. BioMed Central. https://old.biomedcentral.com/about/datamining. Accessed 15 Mar 2017

  27. Mitkov, R.: The Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nasser Ghadiri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nasr Azadani, M., Ghadiri, N. (2018). Evaluating Different Similarity Measures for Automatic Biomedical Text Summarization. In: Abraham, A., Muhuri, P., Muda, A., Gandhi, N. (eds) Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. ISDA 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 736. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76348-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76348-4_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76347-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76348-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics