Skip to main content

Ethics and Integrity in Research: Disciplines and Professions

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity
  • 148 Accesses

Abstract

While it can be argued that the values, principles, and standards that underpin ethical research must apply to all disciplines and professions that conduct research, it remains the case that most, if not all, still seek to devise and apply distinctive ethical codes and/or guidelines that they perceive as specific to their own, specialized field. While highly generalized overarching principles can be accepted, their generality may be regarded as so vague they are impossible to disagree with. Moreover they fail to assist researchers within the specialist professional domain with practical solutions to the ethical issues they may have to confront in their everyday practice. Such an approach could be regarded as a restrictive practice and domain protectionism – but there are also clear practical advantages in a discipline being able to manage its own professional practices and rarely is it the case that generic codes provide some form of “off-the-shelf” solution to an ethical problem within the discipline’s domain. This chapter addresses issues that form the backcloth to the concerns raised by the authors in this section of the handbook.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • de Winter JCF, Dodou D (2017) Human subjects research for engineers: a practical guide. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Dench S, Iphofen R, Huws U (2004) An EU code of ethics for socio-economic research. Institute for Employment Studies (IES). Report 412. Brighton. Retrieved from www.respectproject.org

  • Editorial (2012) Times Higher Education, 1 March 2012, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan P (2012) If trust is lost, future promises naught but troubles for research. Times Higher Education, 19 January, p 28

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway I, Wheeler S (2002) Qualitative research in nursing, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Iphofen R (ed) (2017) Finding common ground: consensus in research ethics across the social sciences. Advances in research ethics and integrity, vol 1. Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro N, Dingwall R (2009) Ethical regulation: a challenge to artistic innovation? A-N Magazine, September, pp 5–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Iphofen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Iphofen, R. (2020). Ethics and Integrity in Research: Disciplines and Professions. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_56-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_56-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics