Abstract
The nanoscience and nanotechnology (N&N) normative framework is a field that attracts intense debate. Current scientific knowledge, wide interdisciplinarity, technological developments, new applications, and emerging markets outline a complex and constantly evolving environment, within which ethical and socially responsible N&N must be developed. Other equally important perspectives include information and communication with the public, scientists’ sense of ethical obligation, health and environmental concerns, and risk assessment. In this context, specific ethical considerations are being raised, such as the difficulty to clarify and control the effects of N&N applications, the swift technological advancement that renders existing guidelines obsolete in an unprecedented pace, and the danger to increase inequalities between rich and poor countries (widening the so-called nano-divide). This chapter gives an overview of (a) risk assessment in N&N, as an important aspect for a deontology of N&N and (b) the N&N normative ethics framework on a European level and beyond. Risk assessment will be presented with regard to the field of N&N applications, i.e., environmental and human, while normative frameworks in N&N research will be focused on Europe and the USA.
References
Andorno R (2004) The precautionary principle: a new legal standard for a technological age. J Int Biotech Law 1:11. https://doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2004.1.1.11
Bhusan B (2010), Introduction to nanotechnology. Ιn: Springer handbook of nanotechnology. Springer, Berlin, 2010, p 1-13
Burri RV, Bellucci S (2008) Public perception of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10:387–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9286-7
Charitidis C (2018) Best practice for identifying and assessing the dual-use issues in enabling technologies research, JANUS. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Key Enabling Technologies. Available via EUROPA, EU law and publications. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e312d8e-8a35-11e8-ac6a-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
Charitidis CA, Vidalis TK (2011) Νανοεπιστήμες και Νανοτεχνολογίες: Το αίτημα της ρύθμισης (Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: the regulation demand). Sakkoulas S.A., Athens
Crowe S (2010) Understanding the ethical implications of nanotechnology: highlights of a limited inquiry by the president’s council on bioethics. http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps92783/nanotechnology_implications.html
CORDIS (2018) European commission, Brussels, https://cordis.europa.eu/
David K, Thompson PB (2008) What can nanotechnology learn from biotechnology. Academic Press, Burlington
European Communities (2005) Nanosciences and nanotechnologies: an action plan for Europe 2005–2009, Brussels, https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vikqhlq0szyn
Florczyk SJ, Saha S (2007) Ethical issues in nanotechnology. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 17(3):271–280
Gwinn MR, Sokull-Kluttgen B (2012) Regulation and legislation. In: Adverse effects of engineered nanomaterials exposure toxicology and impact on human health. Elsevier, London, p 97
Harris J, Holm S (2002) Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox. J Med Philos 27:355. https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.27.3.355.2983
HORIZON 2020 data, European Commission, Brussels https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/dashboard/hub/
International Society For Manufacturing (2016) Service and management engineering 2016 nanotechnology: legal and ethical issues, Bialystok
IRGC (International Risk Governance Council) (2005) Risk governance: towards an integrative approach. Accessed Sept 2005
Schroeder D, Dalton-Brown S, Schrempf B, Kaplan D (2016) Responsible, inclusive innovation and the nano-divide. NanoEthics 10:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0265-2
Lauge P, Westergaard C, Hansen F (2018) The ten decrees of nanomaterials regulations. Nat Nanotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0256-2
Lee CJ, Scheufele D, Lewenstein B (2005) Public attitudes toward emerging technologies. Sci Commun 27:240–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281474
Mnyusiwalla A, Daar AS, Singer PA (2003) ‘Mind the gap’: science and ethics in Nanotechnology. Institute of Physics Publishing. Available Online at stacks.iop.org/Nano/14/R9. Accessed 13 Feb 2003
Renn O, Roco MC (2006) Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J Nanopart Res 8:153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-007-9261-3
Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (2005) Opinion on the appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies. http://files.nanobio-raise.org/Downloads/scenihr.pdf. Accessed Sept 2005
The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992) The rio declaration on environment and development. http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/RIO_E.PDF
The ProSafe White Paper (2017) The Prosafe project. https://www.rivm.nl/en/About_RIVM/Mission_and_strategy/International_Affairs/International_Projects/Completed/ProSafe/ProSafe_White_Paper
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Charitidis, C.A. (2019). Quest for Ethical and Socially Responsible Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. In: Iphofen, R. (eds) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_42-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76040-7_42-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76040-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities