Skip to main content

Time Response-Based Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automatic Control with Experiments

Abstract

Consider the closed-loop system in Fig. 5.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although the poles determine stability and transient response, zeros also have an effect on the final shape of the transient response (see Sect. 8.1, Chap. 8). This is the reason why the design based on the root locus is sometimes performed by trying to cancel one closed-loop pole with a closed-loop zero.

  2. 2.

    If it is assumed that this pole and zero at s = 0 cancel each other out, then a nonzero steady-state deviation would exist and the problem would be worse.

  3. 3.

    At this point, the reader is advised to see Example 8.2 in Chap. 8.

  4. 4.

    It is left as an exercise for the reader to verify this fact.

  5. 5.

    Again, it is left as an exercise for the reader to verify this fact.

References

  1. G. W. Evans, The story of Walter R. Evans and his textbook Control-Systems Dynamics, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, pp. 74–81, December 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Kelly, V. Santibáñez, and A. Loría, Control of robot manipulators in joint space, Springer, London, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Kelly and V. Santibáñez, Motion control of robot manipulators (in Spanish), Pearson Prentice Hall, Madrid, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Kelly, PD control with desired gravity compensation of robotic manipulators: a review, The International Journal of Robotics Research, vo. 16, No. 5, pp. 660–672, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Ogata, Modern control engineering, 4th edition, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. N. S. Nise, Control systems engineering, 5th edition, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2008.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. R. C. Dorf and R. H. Bishop, Modern control systems, 10th edition, Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. C. Kuo, Automatic control systems, Prentice-Hall, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. H. Hostetter, C. J. Savant, and R. T. Stefani, Design of feedback control systems, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Ali and J. H. Burghart, Effects of lag controllers on the transient response, IEE Proceedings-D, Control theory and applications, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 119–122, March 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hernández-Guzmán, V.M., Silva-Ortigoza, R. (2019). Time Response-Based Design. In: Automatic Control with Experiments. Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75804-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics