Abstract
In this chapter, traditional, local, and simply prepared Roman agrarian foods are discussed. While these rustic comestibles were revered by some elites for their symbolically embodied history and cultural capital, they were in stark contrast to the more ostentatious fare dressing other aristocratic tables. The degree of respect for agrarian fare was contingent on the social philosophy of the consumer. For the poor and destitute the food choice was easy, they ate almost anything. For the elite ancient Roman conservative who espoused values from a heroic past, rustic foods offered a venue for political gain. Though, this noble may not have been as principled when eating in private. An aristocratic debate, sometimes against consuming whole animals, sometimes against eating parts of animals, sometimes against the whole and the part, seemed representative of deeper social issues. The confluence of local and foreign ideology had its effect on consumer preferences and culinary fashion. As long as an ancient Roman food remained intact, recognizable, or natural, it could summon rustic history. When comestibles were masticated or transformed their symbolic meanings moved outside the context of local simplicity, into novelties ascribed to foreign influence. While rustic foods in themselves did not necessarily represent luxury, the local comestible could be manipulated through the artifice of culinary preparation. It was these manipulated foods in particular that evoked mixed messages: traditional by nature, novel through preparation, local yet foreign. The end result, however, would obfuscate historic meanings and, as such, a clear sense of Roman aristocratic identity.
References
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (trans: Nice R.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bowman, A. (1994). Life and letters on the Roman frontier. London: British Museum Press.
Braund, S. (1989). City and country in Roman satire. In S. Braund (Ed.), Satire and society in ancient Rome (pp. 23–47). Exeter: University of Exeter. ISBN: 9780859893312.
Corbier, M. (1989). The ambiguous status of meat in ancient Rome. Food and Foodways:Explorations in the History and Culture of Human Nourishment, 3(3), 223–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/07409710.1989.9961951.
Corbier, M. (1999). The Broad bean and the moray. In J. Flandrin & M. Montanari (Eds.), Food: A culinary history from antiquity to the present (pp. 128–140). New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 128–140.
Coleman, K. M. (1990). Fatal charades: Roman executions staged as mythological events. JRS 80, 44–73.
Courtney, E. (2001). A companion to Petronius. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
D’Arms, J. (1999). Performing culture: Roman spectacle and the banquets of the powerful. In B. Bergmann & C. Kondoleon (Eds.), The art of ancient spectacle (pp. 301–319). New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN-10: 0300077335.
Daubeny, C. (1857). Lectures on Roman husbandry. Oxford: J. Wright.
Donahue, J. F. (1996). Epula Publica: The Roman community at table during the principate. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 5131. (UMI No. 9715690).
Davies, R. W. (1971). The Roman military diet. Britannia, 2, 122–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/525803.
Edmunds, L. (1980). Ancient Roman and modern American food. A comparative sketch of two semiological systems. Comparative Civilizations Review, 5, 52–69.
Evans, L. (1890). The satires of juvenal, Persius, Sulpicia and Lucilius. London: George Bell & Sons.
Friedlander, L. (1908). Roman life and manners under the early empire. London: Routledge.
Garnsey, P. (1999). Food and society in classical antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612534.
Grant, M. (1987). The world of Rome. New York: Meridian.
Grant, M. (2000). Galen on food and diet. New York: Routledge.
Gruen, E. (1992). Culture and national identity in republican Rome. Ithica: Cornell University. ISBN-13: 978-0801480416.
Hudson, N. (1989). Food in Roman Satire. In S. Braund (Ed.), Satire and society in ancient Rome (pp. 69–87). Exeter: University of Exeter, 69–87.
Jones, P. (2010). Cleopatra’s cocktail. Classical World, 103, 207–220.
Killeen, J. (1959). What was the Linea Dives (martial VIII.78.7)? American Journal of Philology, 80, 185–188. https://doi.org/10.2307/292459.
Pavlovskis, Z. (1973). Man in an artificial landscape: The marvels of civilization in imperial Roman literature. In Leiden. Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
Purcell, N. (1995). Eating fish: The paradoxes of seafood. In J. Wilkens, D. Harvey, & D. Dobson (Eds.), Food in antiquity (pp. 132–149). Exeter: Exeter University Press. ISBN-13: 978–0859894180.
Schmeling, G. (1970). Trimalchio’s menu and wine list. Classical Philology, 65, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1086/365652.
Wyetzner, P. (1995). The social and cultural contexts of Roman sumptuary intervention. Dissertation Abstracts International, 56(10), 4099. (UMI No. 9602803).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Feldman, C., Jones, P. (2019). Simplicity and Performance in Roman Agrarian Foods. In: Meiselman, H. (eds) Handbook of Eating and Drinking. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75388-1_6-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75388-1_6-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75388-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75388-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences