Abstract
Since its inception, the role of the school district superintendent in the USA has reflected changes in society, shifting from managerial oversight to more complex responsibilities. The introduction of the school district superintendent position during the middle of the nineteenth century and myriad social, economic, political, and technological changes have had a profound effect on the nature of schooling and on the refinement of superintendents’ work. In retrospect, public education has served as a crucible of change and facilitated the nation’s shift from an agricultural and industrial economy to an information-based economy. Over time, schools served an increasingly urbanized and complex society, assimilated unprecedented waves of immigrants, meliorated the effects of poverty on leaners, and prepared successive generations of children to enter the workforce successfully. Further, as society changed, the purpose of schooling was redefined. During the last half of the twentieth century, education policy shifted from simply ensuring that students were literate and numerate to addressing more challenging issues of broadening their access to schooling and ensuring that all children learn. Public education in the USA is thus situated at the confluence of two policy streams that are decidedly different yet complimentary: Neoliberal educational reform mandates the focus on ensuring that the nation is completive in the global economy and that the press for accomplishing social justice in public schools is achieved. A discursive analysis of superintendents’ work suggests that it was and continues to be defined by changing circumstances and may be described by several role characteristics (i.e., teacher-scholar, organizational manager, democratic leader, applied social scientist, communicator). As school district chief executive officers (CEOs), superintendents have the position and considerable authority to make changes. Consequently, they need acuity not only for recognizing societal changes but also for interpreting how these shifts may influence their administrative roles, district organizational structures, and work focus and culture. In this regard, the role of superintendent is central to accomplishing social justice in public schools. Thus, an examination of educational reform initiatives, demographic shifts, and superintendents’ role characteristics provides a framework for understanding how social justice, organizational justice, and organizational learning are intricately entwined and for understanding how superintendents may contribute to accomplishing a more socially just and democratic society. In the long term, successful efforts at changing the organizational and social architecture of school districts are a powerful way to improve the lives of children specifically and society generally.
References
Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Axley, S. R. (1996). Communication at work: Management and the communication-intensive organization. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Berliner, D. C. (2006). Our impoverished view of educational research. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 949–995.
Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Björk, L. G. (2001a). Preparing the next generation of superintendents: Integrating formal and experiential knowledge. In C. C. Brunner & L. G. Björk (Eds.), The new superintendency: Advances in research and theories of school management and educational (pp. 19–54). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Björk, L. G. (2001b). The role of the central office in decentralization. In T. J. Kowalski & G. Perreault (Eds.), 21st century challenges for school administrators (pp. 286–309). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Björk, L. G. (2005). Superintendent-board relations: An historical overview of the dynamics of change and sources of conflict and collaboration. In G. J. Petersen & L. D. Fusarelli (Eds.), The district superintendent and school board relations: Trends in policy development and implementation (pp. 1–22). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Björk, L. G., & Blase, J. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 195–208.
Björk, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (Eds.). (2014). Introduction: International perspectives on educational reform and superintendent leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 351–357.
Björk, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (Eds.). (2018). Introduction to special issue: International perspectives on team leadership. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 128–137.
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2014). The superintendent and educational reform in the United States of America. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 444–465.
Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2018). Superintendent roles as CEO and team leader. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 3(2), 179–205.
Björk, L. G., & Gurley, D. K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 163–185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Björk, L. G., & Keedy, J. L. (2001). Changing social context of education in the United States: Social justice and the superintendency. Journal of In-Service Education, 27(3), 405–427.
Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). The school district superintendent in the United States of America. In A. E. Nir (Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation. An international perspective (pp. 17–38). Hauppauge, NY: Nova.
Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Young, M. D. (2005). National reports and implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 45–70). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Glass, T. E. (2005). Superintendent as organizational manager. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 137–161). Thousand Oakes, CA: Corwin Press.
Brunner, C. C., Grogan, M., & Björk, L. G. (2002). Shifts in the discourse defining the superintendency: Historical and current foundations of the position. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 211–238). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A course resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of public schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Callahan, R. E. (1966). The superintendent of schools: A historical analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate Institute of Education, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 0104 410).
Chingos, M. (2016). School choice as an antipoverty strategy [Web blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/school-choice-as-an-antipoverty-strategy/
Choo, C. W. (2006). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Clark, D. L., & Astuto, T. A. (1994). Redirecting reform: Challenges to popular assumptions about teachers and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(7), 512–520.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
Coleman, J. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Collinson, V., & Cook, T. F. (2007). Organizational learning: Improving learning, teaching, and leading in school systems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, F., & Zapota-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In J. Greenberg & J. A. Colquitt (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Conrad, C. (1994). Strategic organizational communication: Toward the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
Cosner, S. (2009). Building organizational capacity through trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(2), 248–291.
Counts, G. S. (1927/2018). The social composition of boards of education: A study of the social contract of public education. London, England: Forgotten Books.
Cronin, J. M. (1973). The control of urban schools: Perspective on the power of educational reformers. New York, NY: Free Press.
Cropanzano, R., Bryne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Rupp, D. E. (2001). Self-enhancement biases, laboratory experiences, George Wilhelm Friendrich Hegel and increasingly crowded world of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 260–272.
Cuban, L. (1976). The urban school superintendent: A century and a half of change. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
Dantley, M. E., & Green, T. L. (2015). Problematizing notions of leadership for social justice: Reclaiming social justice through a discourse of accountability and a radical, prophetic, and historical imagination. Journal of School Leadership, 25(5), 825–837.
Datnow, A. (2002). Can we transplant educational reform, and does it last? Journal of Educational Change, 3, 215–239.
DeMatthews, D., Izquierdo, E., & Knight, D. S. (2017). Righting past wrongs: A superintendent’s social justice leadership for dual language education along the U.S.-Mexico border. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2436
Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. In R. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 239–272). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London, England: Routledge.
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803–813.
Fix, M., & Passel, J. S. (2003). U.S. immigration: Trends and implications for schools. Presentation at the National Association for Bilingual Education NCLB Implementation Institute, New Orleans, LA.
Frey, W. H. (2018). Diversity explosion: How new racial demographics are remaking America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Fullan, M. (1983). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London, England: Falmer Press.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. New York, NY: Routledge.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world, change the world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Furman, G. (2012). Social justice leadership as praxis: Developing capacities through preparation programs. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 191–229.
Fusarelli, B. C., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2005). Reconceptualizing the superintendency: Superintendents as social scientists and social activists. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 187–206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Glass, G. V. (2008). Fertilizers, pills, and magnetic strips: The fate of public education in America. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Glass, T. E., Björk, L. G., & Brunner, C. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
Goldin, C. (2003). The human capital century. Education Next, 3(1), 73–78.
Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 1–19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gough, I., & Olofsson, G. (Eds.). (1999). Capitalism and social cohesion: Essays on exclusion and integration. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–421.
Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1, pp. 8–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Helgesen, S. (1995). The web of inclusion: A new architecture for building great organizations. New York, NY: Currency/Doubleday.
Hixon, L., Hepler, B. B., & Kim, M. O. (2011). The white population: 2010. Washington, DC: Census Bureau, U. S. Department of Commerce.
Hoy, W. K., & DiPaola, M. E. (Eds.). (2007). Essential ideas for the reform of American schools. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, J. C. (2004). Organizational justice in school: No justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250–259.
Jones, D. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2013). How perceptions of fairness can change: A dynamic model of organizational justice. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 136–160.
Kirst, M. W., & Wirt, F. M. (2009). The political dynamics of American education (4th ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Kowalski, T. J. (2005a). Evolution of the school superintendent as communicator. Communication Education, 54(2), 101–117.
Kowalski, T. J. (2005b). Evolution of the school district superintendent position. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kowalski, T. J. (2013). The school superintendent: Theory, practices, and cases (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kowalski, T. J., & Björk, L. G. (2005). Role expectations of district superintendents: Implications for deregulating preparation and licensing. Journal of Thought, 40(2), 73–96.
Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2011). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield Education.
Kowalski, T. J., Peterson, G. J., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2007). Effective communication for school administrators: A necessity in an information age. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Lacireno-Paquet, N., Holyoke, T., Moser, M., & Henig, J. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 145–158.
Lambkin, M. L. (2006). Challenges and changes faced by rural superintendents. The Rural Educator, 28(2), 17–24.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498–518.
McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Wang, K., Rathbun, A., et al. (2018). The condition of education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Miller, D. (1999). Principles of social justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1980). Structure in 5’s: A synthesis of the research on organizational design. Management Science, 26(3), 322–341.
Murphy, J. (1990). The reform of American public education in the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
Nieto, S. (2017). On reconciling divergent ideas: A life-long quest. In S. Tobias, J. D. Fletcher, & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Acquired wisdom series (Education review) (Vol. 24). Retrieved from http://edrev.asu.edu/index.php/ER/article/view/2285
Pine, B. J., II, & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Poole, W. L. (2007). Organizational justice as a framework for understanding union-management relations in education. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 725–748.
Popova-Nowak, I. V., & Cseh, M. (2015). The meaning of organizational learning: A meta-paradigm perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 299–331.
Potterton, A. U. (2018). Different choices: A public school community’s responses to school choice reforms. The Qualitative Report, 23(8), 1908–1931.
Powers, J. M., & Potterton, A. U. (2018). The rich get richer: Inequalities in the distribution of tax credit donations to charter schools in Arizona. In Policy futures in education. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1478210318790602
Pulliam, J. D., & Van Patten, J. D. (2007). History of education in America (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Rana, G., Rostogi, R., & Garg, P. (2013). Organizational justice as predictor of activity of the position, achieving results, and developing further potential. Jindal Journal of Business Research, 2(2), 104–115.
Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (2nd ed.). Harvard, MA: Belknap Press.
Scanlan, M. (2011). Organizational learning in schools pursuing social justice: Fostering educational entrepreneurship and boundary spanning. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5(4), 328–346.
Schlechty, P. C. (1997). Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 1(2), 1–17.
Sergiovanni, T. J., Burlingame, M., Coombs, F. S., & Thurston, P. W. (1987). Educational governance and administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smylie, M. A., & Hart, A. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning and challenge: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore-Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Thayer, L. O. (1961). Administrative communication. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Thompson, F. J. (2013). The rise of executive federalism: Implications for the picket fences and IGM [intergovernment management]. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 3–25.
Travis Burns, W. R., & DiPaola, M. F. (2013). A study of organizational justice, organizational citizenship behavior, and student achievement in high schools. American Secondary Education, 42(2), 4–23.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). American FactFinder. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table. Retrieved: 14 April 2013
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (1961). Toward improved school administration: A decade of professional effort to heighten administrative understanding and skills. Battle Creek, MI: Author.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
West, A., Ingram, D., & Hind, A. (2006). “Skimming the cream:” admissions to charter schools in the United States and to autonomous schools in England. Educational Policy, 20(4), 615–639.
Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Ngo, H. (2016). Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions: The mediating role of trust in organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(3), 493–504.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Björk, L.G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., Potterton, A.U. (2019). Educational Reform in the USA: Superintendents’ Role in Promoting Social Justice through Organizational Justice. In: Papa, R. (eds) Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_62-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_62-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education