Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Decision-Making Model for Promoting Social Justice Through the Ethic of Justice, Ethic of Care, and the Ethic of Grace

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education

Abstract

Principals lead schools and have the autonomy to make the final decision in all matters regarding a safe and orderly environment where all students and staff can experience success. For this to occur, it is critical that the principal utilizes a decision-making model for promoting social justice through the ethic of justice, the ethic of care, and the ethic of grace. To fully understand the enormous responsibility that principals face in making countless decision each day, the complexity of a decision-making model must be framed in a way that addresses the social justice mandate. The mandate is a way of leading by being aware of measures that protect and enhance the right of all students and staff to human dignity. The moral responsibility of educational leaders must be to organize and lead the whole school, with full and equal participation of all groups, in the pursuit and attainment of equity, fairness, safety, and success. The principal must fully understand decision-making, its theoretical foundations and application to social justice issues. To be successful in this endeavor, principals must understand the equity-focused (EQ) decision model that encompasses the recognition of decision candidate, satisfying both trajectory and strategic images, framing that focuses on school board policy and social justice orientation criteria. During this stage, three separate and distinct social justice orientations come into play: ethic of justice, ethic of care, and ethic of grace. Incorporating these three social justice orientations helps determine the compatibility and profitability of the decision. The final action in this decision-making model is decision adoption. It is the principal’s equity-focused (EQ) decision model that can, and should, enhance the promotion of social justice through the ethic of justice, ethic of care, and the ethic of grace. Principal preparation program curricula should include a social justice decision-making model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackhoff, R. (1981). Creating the corporate future. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, A., Bell, L., & Griffin, B. (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice: A sourcebook. New York, NY: Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. G., Harper, R. E., & Koschoreck, J. W. (2017). Social justice and school leadership preparation: Can we shift beliefs, values, and commitments? International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 12(1), 1-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. (1990). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, L. R. (1998). Image theory: Theoretical and empirical foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Belle, C. (2019). What is social justice anyway. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2019/01/23/what-is-social-justice-education-anyway.html

  • Berkovich, I. (2017). Reflections on leadership preparation programs and social justice: Are the power and responsibility of faculty all in one design? Journal of Educational Administration, 55(3), 269-271. 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J. R. (2016). Leadership preparation programs and social justice, lessons learned from a graduate school of education (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/3894

  • Calabrese, R. L., Zepeda, S. J., & Shoho, A. R. (1996). Decision making: A comparison of groups and individual decision-making differences. Journal of School Leadership, 6(5), 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambron-McCabe, N., & McCarthy, M. (2005). Educating school leaders for social justice. Journal of Education Policy, 19(1), 201–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemen, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2001). Making hard decisions with decision tools. Belmont, CA: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud, H. (2006). Integrity: The courage to meet the demands of reality. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, G. M., & Glascock, C. (1995). Socialization to a new conception of the principalship. Journal of Educational Administration, 33(1), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, R. L., & Porter-Gehrie, C. (1980). The discretionary behavior of principals in large-city schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(1), 25–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, J. L. (1994). School-based decision making: Kentucky’s test of decentralization. Kappan, 75(9), 706–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMatthews, D., Mungal, A., & Carrola, P. (2015). Despite best intentions: A critical analysis of social justice leadership and decision making. Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research, 52(17), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diem, S., & Carpenter, B. (2012). Social justice and leadership preparation: Developing a transformative curriculum. Planning and Changing, 43(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, W. C. (2009). Principals’ value-informed decision-making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of moral leadership praxis. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 50–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2003). The moral imperative of school leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2011). The moral imperative realized. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, S. (2009). Ethical decision-making: The doctrine of sin and grace. Potchefstroom, South Africa: School of Ecclesiastical Sciences, North-West University. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/ids/v43n2/07.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasman, N., & Fuller, J. (1992). Assessing the decision-making patterns of school principals. International Journal of Educational Management, 6(3), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, W. J. (1964). Administrative decision-making: A heuristic model. NY: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, G. A. (1995). Influences of shared decision making on school and classroom activity: Conversations with five teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, P., & Pazey, B. (2016). Transforming educational leadership preparation: Starting with ourselves. The Qualitative Report, 21(10), 1751–1752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, J. F. (1986). The conditions of discretion: Autonomy, community, bureaucracy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie, R., & Dawes, M. D. (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2018). Organizational ethics: A practical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, C. L., & Murtadha, K. (2002). Leadership for social justice. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 101(1), 134–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (1971). Decision theory and human behavior. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunenburg, F. C. (1995). The principalship: Concepts and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manasse, A. L. (1985). Improving conditions for principal effectiveness: Policy implications for research. The Elementary School Journal, 85(3), 439–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Hooley, R. M. (2006). The assistant principal: Leadership choices and challenges (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, D. (2015). Insights: How expert principals make difficult decisions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mthethwa-Sommers, S. (2014). Narratives of social justice education. Springbriefs in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08431-2_2

    Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu, J., & Connolly. (1998). In G. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantilat, S. (2008). Beneficence vs non-maleficence. Fast facts. Regents, University of California. Retrieved from http://missinglink.ucsf.edu/lm/ethics/content%20pages/fast_fact_bene_nonmal.htm

  • Pitner, N. (1982). Training of the school administrator: State of the art, occasional paper. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R. L., Rasheed, A. M. A., & Kotlic, A. G. (1995). Rationality in strategic decision processes, environmental dynamism and firm performance. Journal of Management, 21(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rassmussen, J. (1999). Ecological Interface Design for Reliable Human-Machine Systems. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9(3), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebore, R. (2014). The ethics of educational leadership. Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-McCutchen, R. L. (2014). The moral imperative of social justice leadership: A critical component of effective practice. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R. (1994). Unconventional wisdom. New York, NY: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sernak, K. (1998). School leadership: Balancing power with caring. Teachers College Press. NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipengrower, J. A., & Conway, J. A. (1998). Expecting excellence: Creating order out of chaos in a school district. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K. (2016). Nel Noddings, the ethics of care and education. The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved from: http://infed.org/mobi/nel-noddings-the-ethics-of-care-and-education/

  • Social Justice Training Institute. (2018). What is social justice? Retrieved from http://www.sjti.org/home_student.html

  • Stage Left Productions Workshop for Canada World Youth. (2018). Oppression and privilege framework. Retrieved from https://acgc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Oppression-and-Privilege-Framework.pdf

  • Student Affairs Administrators in Higher Education (NAPSA). (2018). Social justice. Retrieved from https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/Social_Justice.pdf

  • Turhan, M. (2010). Social justice leadership implications for roles and responsibilities of school administrators. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, L. (2012). Leading with hearts and minds: Ethical orientations of educational leadership doctoral students. Values and Ethics in Educational Administration, 10, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2016). Ethics education: A national imperative. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/07/14/ethics-education-a-national-imperative.html

  • Wagner, P., & Simpson, D. (2009). Ethical decision making in school administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA, USA

    Glenn L. Koonce & Kurt Kreassig

Authors
  1. Glenn L. Koonce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kurt Kreassig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn L. Koonce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Comparative & International Education and Leadership, Soka University of America, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA

    Rosemary Papa

Section Editor information

  1. The Graduate School, Soka University of America, Aliso Viejo, California, USA

    John M. Heffron

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Koonce, G.L., Kreassig, K. (2020). A Decision-Making Model for Promoting Social Justice Through the Ethic of Justice, Ethic of Care, and the Ethic of Grace. In: Papa, R. (eds) Handbook on Promoting Social Justice in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_125-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74078-2_125-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74078-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation