Skip to main content

Appendix 1: Why John Kotter’s Model Was Chosen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Scrum Culture

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 7138 Accesses

Abstract

There are many organizational change models out there. Most only describe change efforts in a general way, but some are specifically applied to a Scrum context. This book focuses very much on Kotter’s approach and I want to explain the reasons. In order to do that, I will first briefly describe four different models, starting with two specific to Scrum. Then I will compare all of them and explain my choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cohn (2009, p. 21): “The five activities of ADAPT are based on ADKAR (Hiatt 2006), a general model of change that includes the steps of Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement.”

  2. 2.

    ©Kim Cameron, University of Michigan.

References

  • Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, M. (2009). Succeeding with Agile. Software development using scrum. Amsterdam: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Loveland: Prosci Learning Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change (New ed.). Boston: Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2012). Software in 30 days. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. (2012). The most influential people in Agile. InfoQ. 17.11.2013. http://www.infoq.com/news/2012/04/agile-influential-people

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maximini, D. (2018). Appendix 1: Why John Kotter’s Model Was Chosen. In: The Scrum Culture. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73842-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics