Abstract
The creation of think tanks has in part been motivated by the desire for an apolitical politics, a politics of facts and standards rather than a politics of interests and public ignorance, and opposed to political machines. This chapter brings out some of the features of this kind of politics in the USA through the historical example of the Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics, which illustrates the place of the construction of a factual world by think tanks as part of policy processes. The history of this bureau also shows how think tanks become surrogates for party intellectuals—a non-category in the USA. Think tanks then proliferated elsewhere as surrogates for politics by normal means.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Martins, H.G. 1998. Technology, Modernity, Politics. In The Politics of Postmodernity, ed. J. Good and I. Velody, 150–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1870. Report of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor I. Boston: Wright & Potter, State Printers. http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/mbsl.html.
———. 1871. Report of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor II. Boston: Wright & Potter, State Printers. http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/MBSL_AnnualReports_Index.pdf.
———. 1872. Report of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor. Boston: Wright & Potter, State Printers.
———. 1874. Report of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor. Boston: Wright & Potter, State Printers. http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/ww/MBSL_AnnualReports_Index.pdf.
Pidgin, C.F. 1876. History of the Bureau of Statistics of Labor of Massachusetts and of Labor Legislation in that State from 1833 to 1876. Boston: Wright and Potter, State Printers.
Rudner, R. 1953. The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science 20 (1): 1–6.
Star, S.L., and J.R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.
Turner, S. 2014a. Expertise and Political Responsibility: The Columbia Shuttle Catastrophe. In The Politics of Expertise, 71–92. New York: Routledge.
———. 2014b. The Pittsburgh Survey and the Survey Movement: An Episode in the History of Expertise. In The Politics of Expertise, 138–151. New York: Routledge.
———. 2017. Knowledge Formations: An Analytic Framework. In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, ed. R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, and R.C.S. Pacheco, 2nd ed., 9–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Watson, W. 2002. The Facts Which Go to Form This Fiction: Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s ‘The Silent Partner’ and ‘The Massachusetts Bureau of Labor Statistics Reports. College Literature 29 (4): 6–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turner, S.P. (2018). Thinking About Think Tanks: Politics by Techno-Scientific Means. In: Castro, J., Fowler, B., Gomes, L. (eds) Time, Science and the Critique of Technological Reason. St Antony's Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71519-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71519-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71518-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71519-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)