Skip to main content

Alternative Group Action in Topos Quantum Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Second Course in Topos Quantum Theory

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 944))

  • 1326 Accesses

Abstract

In this Chapter we will explain an alternative way of describing group actions in topos quantum theory. The definition of group and group action in topos quantum theory was first introduced in [27]. Later, an alternative definition was put forward in [13]. In the following chapter we will explain this new definition which rests on the idea of flows in the spectral presheaf .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\mathcal {B}(\mathcal {H})\) indicates the algebra of bounded operators on the Hilbert space.

  2. 2.

    Note that since ϕ is a *-homomorphisms, then the restriction ϕ| C is norm-closed and hence ϕ| C (C) is a C ∗-algebra.

  3. 3.

    Note that from [50, 4.2.7] we know that when the base map Ï• is surjective on objects then the induced essential geometric morphisms is surjective. Moreover, from [50, 4.2.12] we know that when the base map Ï• is full and faithful, then the induced essential geometric morphisms is an inclusion. It then follows that in our case the essential geometric morphism induced by the isomorphism Ï• is itself an isomorphism.

  4. 4.

    For this reason van den Berg and Heunen introduced their definition as partial C*-algebras, but the term was subsequently changed to piecewise C*-algebra [41].

  5. 5.

    We recall that a forgetful functor ‘forgets’ or drops some or all of the input’s structure or properties ‘before’ mapping to the output.

  6. 6.

    As stated in [13], this quotient is unproblematic when considering single systems and their unitary evolution.

  7. 7.

    Note that in this context the Jordan algebras \(\tilde {\mathcal {N}}\)and \(\tilde {\mathcal {M}}\) associated to the von Neumann algebras \(\mathcal {N}\) and \(\mathcal {M}\) respectively, are JBW-algebras, hence, their ground field is \(\mathbb {C}\).

  8. 8.

    Here \( Aut(\tilde {\mathcal {N}})\) represents the group of Jordan *-automorphisms associated to \(\mathcal {N}\).

  9. 9.

    Similarly as done in [13, 14], from now on, we will define the one-parameter group by \((\hat {U}_{-t})_{t\in \mathbb {R}}\) rather than by \((\hat {U}_{t})_{t\in \mathbb {R}}\). This is in accordance with the fact that, as seen above, in canonical quantum theory time evolution is given by conjugating by \(\hat {U}^*_t=\hat {U}_{-t}\) instead of \(\hat {U}_t\).

  10. 10.

    Recall that the definition of outer daseinisation is given by \(\delta ^o(\hat {P})=\bigwedge \{\hat {Q}\in \mathcal {P}(V)|\hat {Q}\geq \hat {P}\}\).

  11. 11.

    Recall that, for each V ′⊆ V , the morphisms \( \underline {\Sigma }^{\mathcal {N}}(i_{V'V})\) are continuous and hence measurable. This implies that the inverse \( \underline {\Sigma }^{\mathcal {N}}(i_{V'V})^{-1}\) maps measurable sets to measurable sets.

References

  1. A. Doering, Flows on generalised Gelfand spectra of non-abelian unital C*-algebras and time evolution of quantum systems (2012). arXiv:1212.4882 [math.OA]

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Doering, Generalised Gelfand spectra of nonabelian unital C*-algebras (2012). arXiv:1212.2613 [math.OA]

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.A. Dye, On the geometry of projections in certain operator algebras. Ann. Math. 61(1), 73–89 (1955)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Flori, A First Course in Topos Quantum Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 868 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Flori, Group action in topos quantum physics. J. Math. Phys. 54, 3 (2013). arXiv:1110.1650 [quant-ph]

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Hamhalter, Quantum Measure Theory. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 134 (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Heunen, M.L. Reyes, Active lattices determine AW∗-algebras. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 416(1), 289–313 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. P.T. Johnstone, Sketches of an Elephant A Topos Theory Compendium I, II (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Kochen, E. Specker, The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17(1), 59–87 (1967)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. S. MacLane, I. Moerdijk, Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory (Springer, London, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  11. nLab, Stuff, structure, property (2014). http://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/stuff,+structure,+property/38

  12. B. van den Berg, C. Heunen, Noncommutativity as a colimit. Appl. Categ. Struct. 20(4), 393–414 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Vickers, Topology via Logic (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Flori, C. (2018). Alternative Group Action in Topos Quantum Theory. In: A Second Course in Topos Quantum Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 944. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71108-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics