Definitions
Consumption is defined as purchase and use of all goods and services by individuals, households, and social groups.
MINDSPACE is a mnemonic that is used to set out nine robust influences on human behavior (messenger, incentives, norms, defaults, salience, priming, affect, commitment, ego).
Nudges are easy and cheap changes to some aspect of the choice architecture to alter human behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives.
Introduction
Human behavior is the key driver of all major threats to all life on land and biodiversity from habitat loss to climate change. Consumption of all goods and services requires the transformation of many natural resources via use as sources and sinks, which in turn impacts biodiversity. Individual’s lifestyle choices, in areas like food, energy, and water, can have indirect impacts by reducing emissions and demand-side pressures for wildlife and land. Individuals and...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Abrahamse W, Steg L (2013) Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis. Glob Environ Chang 23:1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029
Adriaanse MA, Vinkers CDW, De Ridder DTD, Hox JJ, De Wit JBF (2011) Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Appetite 56:183–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.10.012
Ahn H-K, Kim HJ, Aggarwal P (2014) Helping fellow beings: anthropomorphized social causes and the role of anticipatory guilt. Psychol Sci 25:224–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496823
Akers JF, Yasué M (2019) Motivational crowding in payments for ecosystem service schemes: a global systematic review. Conserv Soc 17:377–389. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_90
Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation. Am Econ Rev 104:3003–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003
Ariely D, Bracha A, Meier S (2009) Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. Am Econ Rev 99:544–555. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.1.544
Asensio OI, Delmas MA (2016) The dynamics of behavior change: evidence from energy conservation. J Econ Behav Organ 126:196–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.012
Balliet D (2010) Communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: a meta-analytic review. J Confl Resolut 54:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709352443
Barrage L, Chyn E, Hastings J (2020) Advertising and environmental stewardship: evidence from the BP oil spill. AEJ Econ Policy 12(3):3–61. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20160555
Batson CD, Kennedy CL, Nord L-A, Stocks EL, Fleming DA, Marzette CM, Lishner DA, Hayes RE, Kolchinsky LM, Zerger T (2007) Anger at unfairness: is it moral outrage? Eur J Soc Psychol 37:1272–1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.434
Bell BT, Toth N, Little L, Smith MA (2016) Planning to save the planet: using an online intervention based on implementation intentions to change adolescent self-reported energy-saving behavior. Environ Behav 48:1049–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916515583550
Bernedo M, Ferraro PJ, Price M (2014) The persistent impacts of norm-based messaging and their implications for water conservation. J Consum Policy 37:437–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9266-0
Bolderdijk JW, Steg L (2015) Promoting sustainable consumption: the risks of using financial incentives. In: Thøgersen J, Reisch L (eds) Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 328–341
Bryan G, Karlan D, Nelson S (2010) Commitment devices. Annu Rev Econ 2:671–698. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124324
Butler JM, Fooks JR, Messer KD, Palm-Forster LH (2020) Addressing social dilemmas with mascots, information, and graphics. Econ Inq 58:150–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12783
Camilleri AR, Larrick RP, Hossain S, Patino-Echeverri D (2019) Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels. Nat Clim Chang 9:53–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0354-z
Challender DWS, MacMillan DC (2014) Poaching is more than an enforcement problem. Conserv Lett 7:484–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12082
Chen X, Lupi F, He G, Liu J (2009) Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. PNAS 106:11812–11817. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809980106
Chervier C, Le Velly G, Ezzine-de-Blas D (2017) When the implementation of payments for biodiversity conservation leads to motivation crowding-out: a case study from the cardamoms forests. Cambodia Ecol Econ 156:499–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.03.018
Creutzig F, Roy J, Lamb WF, Azevedo IML, Bruine de Bruin W, Dalkmann H, Edelenbosch OY, Geels FW, Grubler A, Hepburn C, Hertwich EG, Khosla R, Mattauch L, Minx JC, Ramakrishnan A, Rao ND, Steinberger JK, Tavoni M, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Weber EU (2018) Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nat Clim Chang 8:260–263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0121-1
Czap NV, Czap HJ, Lynne GD, Burbach ME (2015) Walk in my shoes: nudging for empathy conservation. Ecol Econ 118:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.010
DellaVigna S (2009) Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J Econ Lit 47:315–372. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315
Delmas MA, Aragon-Correa JA (2016) Field experiments in corporate sustainability research: testing strategies for behavior change in markets and organizations. Organ Environ 29:391–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616677827
Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, King D, Metcalfe R, Vlaev I (2012) Influencing behaviour: the mindspace way. J Econ Psychol 33:264–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.10.009
Duflo E, Kremer M, Robinson J (2011) Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. Am Econ Rev 101:2350–2390. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2350
Duquette E, Higgins N, Horowitz J (2012) Farmer discount rates: experimental evidence. Am J Agr Econ 94:451–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar067
Durantini MR, Albarracin D, Mitchell AL, Earl AN, Gillette JC (2006) Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behavior change: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups. Psychol Bull 132:212–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.212
Ebeling F, Lotz S (2015) Domestic uptake of green energy promoted by opt-out tariffs. Nat Clim Chang 5:868–871. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2681
Egebark J, Ekström M (2016) Can indifference make the world greener? J Environ Econ Manag 76:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.004
Farrow K, Grolleau G, Ibanez L (2017) Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: a review of the evidence. Ecol Econ 140:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
Fowlie M, Wolfram C, Spurlock CA, Todd A, Baylis P, Cappers P (2017) Default effects and follow-on behavior: evidence from an electricity pricing program. NBER working paper 23553. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23553
Griskevicius V, Cantú SM, van Vugt M (2012) The evolutionary bases for sustainable behavior: implications for marketing, policy, and social entrepreneurship. J Public Policy Mark 31:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.11.040
Hanley N, Boyce C, Czajkowski M, Tucker S, Noussair C, Townsend M (2017) Sad or happy? The effects of emotions on stated preferences for environmental goods. Environ Resour Econ 68:821–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0048-9
Holland RW, Aarts H, Langendam D (2006) Breaking and creating habits on the working floor: a field-experiment on the power of implementation intentions. J Exp Soc Psychol 42:776–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.006
Huyghe E, Verstraeten J, Geuens M, Van Kerckhove A (2017) Clicks as a healthy alternative to bricks: how online grocery shopping reduces vice purchases. J Mark Res 54:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0490
Jacquemet N, Joule R-V, Luchini S, Shogren JF (2013) Preference elicitation under oath. J Environ Econ Manag 65:110–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.05.004
Kristal AS, Whillans AV, Bazerman MH, Gino F, Shu LL, Mazar N, Ariely D (2020) Signing at the beginning versus at the end does not decrease dishonesty. PNAS 117:7103–7107. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911695117
Le Coent P, Préget R, Thoyer S (2017) Compensating environmental losses versus creating environmental gains: implications for biodiversity offsets. Ecol Econ 142:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.008
Löfgren Å, Martinsson P, Hennlock M, Sterner T (2012) Are experienced people affected by a pre-set default option – results from a field experiment. J Environ Econ Manag 63:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2011.06.002
Lokhorst AM, Werner C, Staats H, van Dijk E, Gale JL (2013) Commitment and behavior change: a meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. Environ Behav 45:3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511411477
Maki A, Carrico AR, Raimi KT, Truelove HB, Araujo B, Yeung KL (2019) Meta-analysis of pro-environmental behaviour spillover. Nat Sustain 2:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0263-9
Martin S, Marks J (2019) Messengers: who we listen to, who we don’t, and why. Random House, UK
Mazar N, Zhong C-B (2010) Do green products make us better people? Psychol Sci 21:494–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610363538
Nash N, Whitmarsh L, Capstick S, Hargreaves T, Poortinga W, Thomas G, Sautkina E, Xenias D (2017) Climate-relevant behavioral spillover and the potential contribution of social practice theory. WIREs Clim Change 8:e481. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.481
O’Neill SJ, Hulme M (2009) An iconic approach for representing climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19:402–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.004
O’Neill S, Nicholson-Cole S (2009) “Fear won’t do it” promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun 30:355–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008329201
Onwezen MC, Antonides G, Bartels J (2013) The norm activation model: an exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour. J Econ Psychol 39:141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.005
Palm-Forster LH, Ferraro PJ, Janusch N, Vossler CA, Messer KD (2019) Behavioral and experimental agri-environmental research: methodological challenges, literature gaps, and recommendations. Environ Resour Econ 73:719–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-019-00342-x
Schultz PW (2014) Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior. Eur Psychol 19:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000163
Schultz PW, Messina A, Tronu G, Limas EF, Gupta R, Estrada M (2016) Personalized normative feedback and the moderating role of personal norms: a field experiment to reduce residential water consumption. Environ Behav 48:686–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514553835
Sexton SE, Sexton AL (2014) Conspicuous conservation: the Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides. J Environ Econ Manag 67:303–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.11.004
Shreedhar G, Mourato S (2019) Experimental evidence on the impact of biodiversity conservation videos on charitable donations. Ecol Econ 158:180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.001
Sparkman G, Walton GM (2017) Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychol Sci 28:1663–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617719950
Steg L, Bolderdijk JW, Keizer K, Perlaviciute G (2014) An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: the role of values, situational factors and goals. J Environ Psychol 38:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
Sunstein CR (2014) Nudging: a very short guide. J Consum Policy 37:583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1
Tate K, Stewart AJ, Daly M (2014) Influencing green behaviour through environmental goal priming: the mediating role of automatic evaluation. J Environ Psychol 38:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.02.004
Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven/London
Thomas-Walters L, Raihani NJ (2017) Supporting conservation: the roles of flagship species and identifiable victims. Conserv Lett 10:581–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12319
Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Burns WJ, Erlandsson A, Koppel L, Asutay E, Tinghög G (2016) The arithmetic of emotion: integration of incidental and integral affect in judgments and decisions. Front Psychol 7:325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00325
Verplanken B, Holland RW (2002) Motivated decision making: effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:434–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434
Welsh DT, Ordóñez LD, Snyder DG, Christian MS (2015) The slippery slope: how small ethical transgressions pave the way for larger future transgressions. J Appl Psychol 100:114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036950
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Shreedhar, G. (2020). Consumption and Biodiversity Conservation: Insights from Behavioral Science Using the MINDSPACE Approach. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Life on Land. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_145-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_145-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71065-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71065-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences