Skip to main content

Active Modes and Sustainability

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

Synonyms

Active transport; Human-powered transports; Non-motorized modes; Soft modes

Definition

Active mobility modes are all modes of transportation that involve physical activity and do not require the use of motorized vehicles. Although active modes of mobility include walking, jogging, running, bicycling, small-wheeled transport (skates, skateboards, push scooters, and hand carts, among others – also referred to as micro-mobility), and wheelchair travel, the designation active modes refers commonly to walking and biking.

Active modes are a crucial component of sustainable urban mobility development because (i) they are more energy and environmentally efficient, as they are human-powered; (ii) they promote health as they involve physical activity; (iii) they are socially active, as walking and cycling are often related to collective and socializing activities; and (iv) they are inclusive, since they are free or cheaper transportation modes facilitating the access of people to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abley S, Turner S (2011) Predicting walkability (No. 452). NZ Transport Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR, Tudor-Locke C, Greer JL, Vezina J, Whitt-Glover MC, Leon AS (2011) Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Medicine & science in sports & exercise, 43(8):1575–1581

    Google Scholar 

  • American Planning Association (2014) Investing in place: two generations’ View on the future of communities. American Planning Association. Available online: https://www.planning.org/policy/polls/investing/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018

  • Appleyard D, Lintell M (1972) The environmental quality of City streets: the Residents’ viewpoint. J Am Inst Plann 38(2):84–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Cycling Promotion Foundation (2018) We ride Australia [WWW Document]. https://www.cyclingpromotion.org. Accessed 22 June 2018

  • Austroads (2014) Cycling aspects of Austroads guides. Project No. NT2011. Published by Austroads, Lda

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw C (1993) Creating – and using – a rating system for neighborhood walkability: towards an agenda for “local heroes. In: 14th international pedestrian conference, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Broseta MT (2015) Urban quality improvement programs in the sustainable urban mobility plan of Valencia (Spain). WIT Trans Built Environ 146:351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell R, Wittgens M (2004) The Business Case for Active Transportation: the Economic Benefits of Walking and Cycling. NACTO (National Association of City Transportation Officials). Programme “Go for Green”. Gloucester, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Kockelman K (1997) Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 2:199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chester MV, Horvath A (2009) Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environ Res Lett 4(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP, Bovy PHL (2005) First-order pedestrian traffic flow theory. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1934:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193400105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nazelle A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Antó JM, Brauer M, Briggs D, Braun-Fahrlander C, Cavill N, Cooper AR, Desqueyroux H, Fruin S, Hoek G, Panis LI, Janssen N, Jerrett M, Joffe M, Andersen ZJ, van Kempen E, Kingham S, Kubesch N, Leyden KM, Marshall JD, Matamala J, Mellios G, Mendez M, Nassif H, Ogilvie D, Peiró R, Pérez K, Rabl A, Ragettli M, Rodríguez D, Rojas D, Ruiz P, Sallis JF, Terwoert J, Toussaint JF, Tuomisto J, Zuurbier M, Lebret E (2011) Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int 37:766–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekoster J, Schollaert U (1999) Cycling: the way ahead for towns and cities. Published by the European Community, DG XI, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill J, McNeil N (2013) Four types of cyclists? Examination of typology for better understanding of bicycling behavior and potential. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2387(1):129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour D (2010) PRESTO cycling policy guide – general framework. European Cyclist Federation 8ECF, available at www.presto-cycling.eu

  • ELTIS (2014) Guidelines: developing and implementing a sustainable urban mobility plan. European Platform on Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. Available online: http://www.eltis.org/guidelines/sump-guidelines. Accessed 1 Oct 2018

  • Evans GW (2003) The built environment and mental health. J Urban Health 80:536–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Cervero R (2010) Travel and the built environment. J Am Plan Assoc 76:265–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felix R, Moura F, Clifton KJ (2017) Typologies of urban cyclists: a review of market segmentation methods for planning practice. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2662:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fewings R (2001) Wayfinding and airport terminal design. J Navig 54(2):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Front Seat. Walk Score Methodology (2011) Available online: http://www.walkscore.com/methodology.shtml. Accessed 7 June 2011

  • Fruin JJ (1971) Pedestrian planning and design, revised edn. Elevator World, Mobile

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghel J (2011) Cities for people. Island Press, available at https://islandpress.org/books/cities-people

  • Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Knuiman M, McCormack G, Van Niel K, Timperio A, Christian H, Foster S, Divitini M, Middleton N, Boruff B (2013) The influence of urban design on neighborhood walking following residential relocation: longitudinal results from the RESIDE study. Soc Sci Med 77:20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy SL (2005) Critical assessment of the literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. Report TRB Special, 102

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy SL, Niemeier DA (1997) Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environ Plan A 29:1175–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HCM (2010) Highway capacity manual – 2010. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier B (2005) The art of place and the science of space. World Architecture 185: 96–102. Available online: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1678/. Accessed 1 Oct 2018

  • Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck S, Harms L, Jorritsma P, Kalf N (2007) Beleving en beeldvorming van mobiliteit. Kennisinstituut voor Mobiliteitsbeleid, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamíquiz PJ, López-Domínguez J (2015) Effects of built environment on walking at the neighborhood scale. A new role for street networks by modeling their configurational accessibility. Transp Res A Policy Pract 74:148–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2013) TDM Encyclopedia – Glossary [WWW Document]. Victoria Transp Policy Inst. http://www.vtpi.org/tdm. Accessed 19 June 2018

  • Litman T (2018) Evaluating active transport benefits and costs. Guide to valuing walking and cycling improvements and encouragement programs 11 April 2018. Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs Victoria Transport Policy Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan A, Connor J, Witten K, Kearns R, Rees D, Woodward A (2014) The societal costs and benefits of commuter bicycling: simulating the effects of specific policies using system dynamics modeling. Environ Health Perspect 122:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijer R (2012) Traffic planning in Amsterdam shared spaces Shared mobility. IMPACTS annual conference, Paris – June

    Google Scholar 

  • Moura F, Magalhães J, Santos LP (2017) Growing from incipient to large cycle networks in hilly consolidated urban areas: the case of Lisbon. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 1:170–190

    Google Scholar 

  • NACTO (2014) Urban bikeway design guide. ed. National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). Published by Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman PW, Kenworthy JR (1989) Gasoline consumption and cities: a comparison of US cities with a global survey. J Am Plan Assoc 55(1):24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucher J, Buehler R, Bassett DR, Dannenberg AL (2010) Walking and cycling to health: a comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. Am J Public Health 100:1986–1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl A, de Nazelle A (2012) Benefits of the shift from car to active transport. Transp Policy 19:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LTA (2011) Passenger transport mode shares in world cities. Journeys. Singapore: Land Transport Authority, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüetschi UJ (2007) Wayfinding in scene space modelling transfers in public transport. Doctoral dissertation, University of Zurich, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryus P, Ferguson E, Laustsen KM, Schneider RJ, Proulx FR, Hull T, Miranda-Moreno L (2014) Guidebook on pedestrian and bicycle volume data collection – NCHRP REPORT 797. Transportation Research Board

    Google Scholar 

  • Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D (2003) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health 93:1552–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Conway TL, Slymen DJ, Cain KL, Chapman JE, Kerr J (2009) Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes. Soc Sci Med 68:1285–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton PA, Schneider RJ, Muhs CD, Clifton KJ (2014) The pedestrian index of the environment (PIE): representing the walking environment in planning applications. In: Presented at the 93rd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • SUSTRAN (2014) Handbook for cycle-friendly design. SUSTRAN. https://www.sustrans.org.uk

  • The City of New York (2010) planNYC Progress report 2010: a greener, greater New York. The City of New York, New York. available at http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc/downloads/pdf/publications/planyc_progress_report_2010.pdf

  • Transport for London (2014) London cycling design standards. TfL - Transport for London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Habitat (2016) The New Urban Agenda, adopted by the United Nations on 20 October 2016 [WWW Document]. https://unhabitat.org/new-urban-agenda-adopted-at-habitat-iii/. Accessed 26 Sept 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipe Moura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Moura, F., Kalakou, S. (2019). Active Modes and Sustainability. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T. (eds) Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_7-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_7-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71059-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics