Skip to main content

Supply Chain Accountability Through Extraterritorial Tortious Litigation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG))

Definitions

Tortious litigation involves a civil wrong (a tort) that causes a claimant to suffer harm, resulting in legal liability. Extraterritorial tortious litigation occurs where the legal proceedings are pursued in a different jurisdiction from where the tort occurred.

Introduction

Despite increasing pressure by the international community to improve supply chain accountability, corporate supply chains remain largely unregulated and rife with human rights abuse. This entry is premised on the argument that change can be achieved where states, corporations, and civil society work together to achieve accountability and alter practice (Ruggie 2013). The UN Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs) emphasize the importance of collaboration between the corporate sector and governments to realize the objectives. Agenda 30 calls on “all businesses to apply their creativity and innovation to solving sustainable development challenges” and commits States to “foster a dynamic and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Ashworth A (2006) Principles of criminal law, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekker HFP (2004) Corporate aiding and abetting and conspiracy liability under international law. In: Proceedings of 6th Hague Joint conference on contemporary issues of international law

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco E (2019) Vedanta, a long awaited landmark in extra-territorial tort litigation against parent companies: reflections on jurisdiction. Man J Int Econ Law 4:71

    Google Scholar 

  • Cane P (2002) Tort law as regulation. Common Law World Rev 31:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Choc versus Hudbay (2020) Klippensteins, Barristers & Solicitors. http://www.chocversushudbay.com. Accessed 13 Apr 2020

  • Dodge WS (2019) Corporate liability under the US Alien Tort Statute: a comment on Jesner v Arab Bank. Bus Hum Rights J 4:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorey DJ (2019) Canada’s largest retailer, auditor not negligent in failing to protect workers at Rana Plaza. Int Lab Rights Case Law J 5(1):102–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle U (2018) The cost of territoriality: Jus Cogens claims against corporations. Case West Res J Int Law 50(225):229

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon G, Macklin A, Simons PC (2003) Deconstructing engagement. Public law research paper (04–07). University of Toronto. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=557002

  • Gillaerts P (2019) Instrumentalisation of tort law: widespread yet fundamentally limited. Utrecht Law Rev 15(3):27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins R (1992) The relationship between international and regional human rights norms and domestic law. Commonw Law Bull 18:1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holly G (2018) Transnational tort and access to remedy under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Kamasaee v Commonwealth. Melb J Int Law 19:52

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh HH (2004) Separating myth from reality about corporate responsibility litigation. J Int Econ Law 7(2):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortmann J (2009) The tort law industry, vol 325. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kysar D (2018) The public life of private law: tort law as a risk regulation mechanism. Eur J Risk Regul 9(1):48–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loi no 2017–399 du 27 mars 2017 relative au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d’ordre (1). https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000034290626&categorieLien=id. Accessed on 10 Apr 2020

  • Martin R (1990) Categories of negligence and duties of care: Caparo in the house of lords. Mod Law Rev 53(6):824–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaughey E (2011) Donoghue v. Salomon in the High Court. J Pers Inj Law 249. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2237965

  • Mohanty S, Bhandari V (2011) The evolution of the separate legal personality doctrine and its exceptions: a comparative analysis. Company Lawyer 32(7):194–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombo D (2015) Chandler v. Cape: an alternative to piercing the corporate veil beyond Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell. Br J Am Leg Stud 4(1):453–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombo D (2019) The case for legal reform. In: Business and human rights, 1st edn. Hart Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, 8th Sess. U.N. DOC A/HRC/8/5, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A (2011) Comparative international law? The role of national courts in creating and enforcing international law. Int Comp Law Q 60:57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie J (2013) Business and human rights: the next chapter. Dovenschmidt Q 4:168–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Rühmkorf A (2015) Corporate social responsibility, private law and global supply chains. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sanger A (2019) Parent company duty of care to third parties harmed by overseas subsidiaries. Camb Law J 78(3):486–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197319000801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons P, Macklin A (2014) The governance gap: extractive industries, human rights, and the home state advantage. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly, 70th Sess., U.N. Doc. A/RES/70/1, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (2013) Integrating human rights into the post-2015 development agenda: follow-up and review: ensuring accountability for the SDGs. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/MDGs/Post2015/AccountabilityAndThePost2015Aagenda.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2020

  • UN International Law Commission, Report of the International Law Commission, 73rd Sess., Supp. No. 10, U.N. Doc. A/73/10, 2018

    Google Scholar 

Cases

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was written in the author’s personal capacity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina de Puy Kamp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kamp, N.d.P. (2020). Supply Chain Accountability Through Extraterritorial Tortious Litigation. In: Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Lange Salvia, A., Wall, T. (eds) Decent Work and Economic Growth. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_117-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_117-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71058-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71058-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics